Skip to content

Autologous Fat in Peripheral Nerve Injury

Use of Autologous Fat to Improve Functional Outcomes After Upper Limb Nerve Injuries

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04653129
Enrollment
44
Registered
2020-12-04
Start date
2021-01-31
Completion date
2023-01-31
Last updated
2020-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nerve Injury

Keywords

fat graft, autologous fat, peripheral nerve injury

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of autologous fat graft in enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration. The investigators hypothesize that fat grafting will allow for faster and greater recovery of motor and sensory function following surgical repair of injured peripheral nerves.

Detailed description

Traumatic injuries to peripheral nerves are a frequent finding after hand trauma. High morbidity after nerve injuries mainly affects the younger and working population, with consequent decrease in life quality and productivity . Even in direct nerve repair and microsurgical nerve coaptation, regeneration is often suboptimal with incomplete target reinnervation. Suboptimal outcome is attributed to axonal degeneration, fibrotic scar formation, and neuromas at the site of injury. The use of adipose tissue has become very popular in tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery in recent years. It is proposed as a regenerative tool for various tissues, including peripheral nerves, because it offers an effective and minimally invasive procedure for obtaining stem cells. Unprocessed fat grafting can provide a simple approach to improve peripheral nerve regeneration by means of neoangiogenesis & inflammatory response modulation. Furthermore, it serves as a good protective barrier in peripheral nerve surgery, reducing fibrosis and adhesions. A recent study advocated by Tuncel et al, concluded that combined use of autologous fat graft with surgical repair methods induced significantly better regeneration in rats \[3\]. In another study by Kilic et al, using adipose tissue flap in a crush injury model in rats was found to be superior to other groups in myelin thickness, nerve fiber density, axon count, and functional recovery at 4 weeks. They concluded that fat tissue seems to promote nerve regeneration because of its stem cell content. To our knowledge, no prior studies have examined the use of fat graft in peripheral nerve repair in humans. So, the investigators proposed this clinical study to evaluate the outcomes of primary nerve repair combined with autologous fat graft in peripheral nerve injuries.

Interventions

* The fat grafts will be harvested from the abdomen or lateral thighs in a closed sterile system, then prepared according to Coleman guidelines. The blood and oil layers are then separated from the adipose tissue. * The lipoaspirate will be injected based on a technique described by Vaienti et al, by 17-gaug cannula which will be inserted through the skin around the main incision at the nerve repair site, and the fat graft will be injected after closure of the skin.

PROCEDUREPrimary Nerve Repair

Standard Epineural nerve repairs will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

the assessment of outcome measures will be performed by a dedicated surgeon not involved in the surgery or preoperative patient evaluation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Acute median or ulnar nerve lacerations below elbow

Exclusion criteria

* Old Nerve lacerations \> 48 hours * Nerve gap which requires nerve grafting * Psychosocial issues that would limit participation and compliance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified British Medical Research Council, sensory grading6-12 monthsstandardized clinical assessment of sensory function using two-point discrimination and monofilament testing by a score from S0 to S4; the higher score indicates better sensation
Modified British Medical Research Council, motor grading6-12 monthsstandardized clinical assessment of motor function on a scale from M0 to M5; the higher score indicates better strength.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nerve conduction study6-12 monthsmeasure for amplitude of response, latency of response and velocity of response measurements.
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score6-12 monthsself-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability)

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed S Sharaf, MsC
ahmed.sharaf90@aun.edu.eg01090619155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026