Skip to content

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Midazolam for MRI In Pediatrics

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Midazolam as Sole Sedative Agents for MRI In Pediatrics: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04652661
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-12-03
Start date
2020-12-10
Completion date
2022-01-01
Last updated
2023-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam, MRI, Pediatrics

Brief summary

An increasing number of studies have reported the use of dexmedetomidine in clinical practice. However, few studies have reported on the intranasal use of dexmedetomidine in radiological procedures The aim of this work is to compare the efficacy and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam in pediatrics undergoing MRI.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial will be carried out on 60 children undergoing elective MRI in Tanta University Hospitals. Sixty children will be randomly allocated into two equal groups by computer-generated sequence through sealed opaque envelopes: Group D: 30 children will be sedated with 2 μg/kg intranasal DEX. Group M: 30 children will be sedated with 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

30 children will be sedated with 2 μg/kg intranasal DEX.

DRUGMidazolam

30 children will be sedated with 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Sixty children will be randomly allocated into two equal groups by computer generated sequence through sealed opaque envelopes: Group D: 30 children will be sedated with 2 μg/kg intranasal DEX. Group M: 30 children will be sedated with 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Aged from 2 to 8 years Both sexes ASA physical status I and II Elective MRI.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient's guardian refusal. 2. Body mass index \>30 kg/m2 3. Known allergy to dexmedetomidine or midazolam. 4. Suspected difficult airway. 5. Upper respiratory tract infection 6. Anatomical structural deformity of the nasal cavity. 7. Severe liver or renal impairment. 8. Severe bradycardia or atrioventricular block above II degree type 2. 9. Administration of digoxin or beta blockers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of successful sedationOne hourSuccessful sedation is defined as the time taken to achieve an MOAA/S score of 4 and is the time when the patients are calm and sedated and allow intravenous cannulation and MRI examination without crying or agitation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The onset time of sedationOne hourThe onset time of sedation is defined as the time from drug administration to successful sedation.
The occurrence of Adverse effectsOne hourThe occurrences of adverse events will be recorded (e.g. bradycardia, a significant oxygen saturation decrease, severe arrhythmia or arrest).
The degree of operator satisfactionOne hourMRI operator satisfaction before discharge using a 5- point score, with (0 = very dissatisfied, 1 = dissatisfied, 2 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 3 = satisfied and 4 = very satisfied).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026