Skip to content

Punch Trabeculectomy Versus Classic Trabeculectomy

Values of Releasable Sutures in Punch Trabeculectomy Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04651231
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-12-03
Start date
2012-01-20
Completion date
2014-10-16
Last updated
2020-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-Angle

Brief summary

Bleb failure is reduced with Punch trabeculectomy procedure. Wide sclerostomy during surgery is wanted but controllable. This can be done with single securing suture, releasable sutures and topical intraoperative mitomycin-c. Average IOP without fluctuation (risk factor) can protect the optic nerve.

Detailed description

This is a prospective randomized study. Patients had uncontrolled glaucoma on maximum tolerated medical therapy including acetazolamide tablets were enrolled in this clinical trial and were randomized to tight flap technique group (group A) and loose flap technique group(group B). Randomization assigned 40 patients to group A and 40 patients to do group B. A total of 80 patients were enrolled in the Study between 2012 and 2014. During trabeculectomy, Trabecular meshwork and scleral lamellae were excised made an opening with the kelly scleral punch 1.0 mm 3-5 bites. At 12 o'clock 10/0 nylon monofilament stitch was used to close the apex of triangular scleral flap tightly and two releasable stitches were used at the sides of triangular scleral flap in group A. Fig-1 At 12 o'clock 10/0 nylon monofilament stitch was used to secure the edges of the flap at the apex of and two-four releasable stitches were used at the sides of triangular scleral flap in group B. The intraocular pressure and bleb morphology were followed for one year after surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREreleasable sutures in punch trabeculectomy

punch trabeculectomy,scleral flap suturing

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The participants were masked during study time through permuted variable block randomization scheme.

Intervention model description

Eighty Patients inclusive, randomly distributed for tight flap technique group (forty patients-group A) and for loose flap technique (securing sutures) group (forty patients-group B).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma * Clinical diagnosis of pigmentary glaucoma * Clinical diagnosis of Pseudophakic glaucoma

Exclusion criteria

* high risk factors for failed trabeculectomy must be present e.g. previous failed trabeculectomy surgery and active intraocular infection/ inflammation. * Clinical diagnosis of aphakic glaucoma was excluded. * Clinical diagnosis of glaucoma with previous ocular incisional surgery (except for clear cornea cataract surgery) were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP)one-year follow upmeasuring IOP at first day ,first month, three months, six months, nine months,and one year after surgery frequent interval in both groups with applanation method( Goldmann applanation tonometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
bleb morphology after surgeryone-year follow upexamination of bleb formed after surgery with Silt Lamp.we comment on the bleb features on each patient in study groups as grade-1 (high elevated bleb), grade-2 (low elevated bleb), grade-3-(encysted bleb), grade-4 (flat bleb).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026