Skip to content

SUNDYS: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Parallel-group Trial

Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Isolated Generalized or Segmental Dystonia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Parallel-group Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04650958
Acronym
SUNDYS
Enrollment
38
Registered
2020-12-03
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2022-01-01
Last updated
2021-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dystonia

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation, Subthalamic nucleus, Randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Dystonia is a group of movement disorders characterized by twisting, repetitive movements, or abnormal postures caused by involuntary muscle contractions and is characterized by a young age of onset and a high disability rate. Early intervention can reduce disability incidence, improve the patient's quality of life, and reduce the burden on families and society. Multiple international guidelines on dystonia have found deep brain stimulation (DBS) to be a safe and effective treatment for refractory dystonia. The globus pallidal internus (GPi) is the mostly widely used target for dystonia. However, there are limitations on the GPi DBS treatment, including slow onset of beneficial effects, poor improvement of axis symptoms, and potential stimulation-related side effects. Previous studies have described the highly successful use of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in patients with refractory dystonia, suggesting that STN DBS is an effective and persisting alternative to pallidal deep brain stimulation. However, all STN DBS treated cases have been analyzed in open-label uncontrolled cohort studies, leading to limited data with a high level of evidence on the STN DBS in dystonia. Further, the investigators hypothesized STN has potentially more effectiveness when compared with GPi, and may be more power-saving and quick-acting. In this study, the investigators will organize a prospective randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study comparing active versus sham stimulation in isolated segmental or generalized dystonia to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of STN DBS by measuring the impact on motor status, mental status, quality of life, the rate of response of the patients (the number of patients with ≥30% improvement in the movement score on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale) and the rate of adverse events during the trial.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDeep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been in use to treat patients with movement disorders since 1989, with many thousands of publications showing its effectiveness. DBS for dystonia received the US FDA mark in 2003 and China FDA mark in 2016. In this study, the DBS system devices are manufactured and donated by SceneRay (Suzhou, China). The Stimulator System is implanted by a qualified neurosurgeon and consists of three implantable components: the leads, the extension wires and the neurostimulator. The DBS programming will start within 1 week after the surgery completed.

Sponsors

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
CollaboratorOTHER
West China Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The randomization will be conducted by the Coordination Center of Clinical Trials (CenTrial) in order to keep the researchers managing the data and the statistician blind to group assignment and the study conditions. All the clinical assessments done during the trial period will be double-blind, e.g., neither the patient not the clinician or study personnel involved in the scoring will not be aware of the condition of stimulation. All personnel, except the physician-programmer responsible for the DBS setting, will be blinded to the identity of the parameters. While programming the programmer will not sit face-to-face with the patient, but in another room adjusting the parameter wirelessly with the help of the attending doctor who will inform the programmer of the patient's reaction. The electrical parameters will be tested in all patients which means they all will perceive similar stimulation related sensations during each follow-up.

Intervention model description

In this study after having DBS leads implanted successfully, 38 patients will be randomly assigned to either the control or experimental group with a 1:1 allocation. The experimental group will receive continuous DBS stimulation for 3 months, while controls will have sham stimulation for 3 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients must meet criteria for the diagnosis of isolated generalized or segmental dystonia, including idiopathic and inherited dystonia, as defined by the Phenomenology and Classification of Dystonia: A Consensus Update 2013; 2. Patients will be ≥ 14 years old; 3. The course of disease will be ≥ 3 years; 4. Patients will have: 1. Significant dystonia symptoms; 2. Compromised life quality; 3. Unsatisfactory response to oral treatment with anticholinergic agents antiepileptic agents, anti-dopamine agents, dopaminergic agents, or muscle relaxants; 4. Unsatisfactory response to or contraindication for previous botulinum toxin treatment; and 5. Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with a diagnosis or probable diagnosis of acquired, compound, and complex dystonia, as defined by the Phenomenology and Classification of Dystonia: A Consensus Update 2013; 2. Previous brain surgery for dystonia; 3. Patients with cognitive impairment (MMSE score \<24) or moderate-severe depressive disorder (BDI\>25); 4. Patients with marked brain atrophy identified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT); 5. Patients with other medical or psychiatric comorbidities that could increase the surgical risk or interfere with completion of the trial; 6. Patients with increased bleeding risk, or other factors contraindicating neurosurgery or general anesthesia; 7. Patients unable to cooperate with the assessments during the follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change from baseline to 3 months after stimulation of Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scoreBaseline; 3months after stimulationThe scale consists of a movement and disability subscale with scores ranging from 0 to 120 and 0 to 30, respectively, higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
36-item Short-Form General Health survey (SF-36)Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulationSF-36 is a measure of health-related quality-of-life with a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains. Higher scores indicate a more favorable health state.
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI)Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulationBDI contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulationBAI contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Baseline; 3months after stimulationMoCA scores range between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal. Lower scores indicate more disability.
Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulationThe AIMS is a 12-item clinician-rated scale to assess severity of dyskinesias. These items are rated on a five-point scale of severity from 0-4. The scale is rated from 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). Two of the 12 items refer to dental care.
The rate of response1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulationThe number of patients with ≥30% improvement in the movement score on the BFMDRS
The rate of adverse event (AE)Within 1 week after surgery; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulation
Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS)1 week and 1 month after stimulationThe scale consists of a movement and disability subscale with scores ranging from 0 to 120 and 0 to 30, respectively, higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)Baseline; 3months after stimulationA detailed computerized cognitive battery selected from CANTAB includes: Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) and Spatial working memory (SWM) for executive function; Motor screening task (MOT) and a five-choice series selection task for attention; Paired associates learning (PAL) and Pattern recognition memory (PRM) for memory.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactKejia Hu, MD, PhD
dockejiahu@gmail.com18930113801

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026