Skip to content

The Effect of IV NSAID's and Corticosteroids on Dysphasia and Dysphonia Following ASDF

The Effect of Intravenous Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Intravenous Corticosteroids on the Likelihood of Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04650893
Enrollment
33
Registered
2020-12-03
Start date
2021-01-02
Completion date
2023-12-08
Last updated
2024-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphagia, Dysphonia

Brief summary

This study is to assess the efficacy of intra-operative intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (Ketorolac) versus intravenous (dexamethasone) administration on dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of two intra-operative, intravenous medications on dysphagia and dysphonia following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The medications include Ketorolac, an anti-inflammatory versus dexamethasone, a corticosteroid. Eligibility criteria includes adults aged 19 years of age or older who are scheduled to undergo a ACDF for radiculopathy or myelopathy. Participants will be recruited for a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical drug study and randomized into three cohorts: (1) control (no steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID), (2) IV NSAID(1-time dose of 30mg of IV Ketorolac at time of closure), and (3) IV steroid (1-time dose of 10mg of IV dexamethasone at the time of closure. The primary outcome measures are patient questionnaires which include the EAT-10 and Bazaz classification for dysphagia and VHI-10 for dysphonia. In addition, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) will also be collected. Research follow-up will be subject completed questionnaires to be collected pre-operatively and then post operation at day 1, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Post operative questionnaires may be collected at time of patient follow-up in clinic, by phone or mail.

Interventions

To assess the efficacy of the meds for dysphagia and dysphonia following ACDF

To assess the efficacy of the meds for dysphagia and dysphonia following ACDF

DRUGPlacebo

Control

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Only patients will be masked from which cohort they were randomized into.

Intervention model description

25 patients into 3 separate arms.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 19 years of age and older * Undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for radiculopathy or myelopathy * No known allergies or sensitivities to steroid or non-steroidal medications

Exclusion criteria

* Procedure is being done for revision, trauma, infection or tumor * Patients with known diagnosed metabolic diseases (diabetes, pancreatitis, gout, electrolyte imbalances, hypertension, hematological abnormalities including gastrointestinal bleeding...) * Patients with known kidney disease or a creatinine level above the upper limit of normal \>1.27

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classificationone yearThe Bazaz grading system (0-none; 1-Mild; 2-Moderate; 3-Severe) is used for dysphagia evaluation
Percentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)one yearPercentage of patients with severe dysphagia based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).Scores on the EAT-10 greater than 15 are indicative of severe dysphonia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).one yearScores on the VHI-10 greater than 11 are indicative of clinically significant dysphonia.
Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI)one yearThe Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10 item pain intensity and daily activity questionnaire that measures daily limitations after cervical spine injury. There are 10 sections, and each section contains 6 statements.The statements are scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. 0: No disability or difficulty 1. Mild disability or difficulty 2. Moderate disability or difficulty 3. Severe disability or difficulty 4. Very severe disability or difficulty 5. Complete disability or difficulty Total Score: The scores from each of the 10 sections are summed to calculate the total score. The maximum possible score is 50, which would indicate severe disability, while a score of 0 indicates no disability.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Painone yearThe Visual analogue scale is a line with numbers underneath it, with extremes marked no pain score of 0 (left) and the worst pain imaginable score of 10 (right).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Study was terminated early, lack of compliance for follow-up intervals.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
no steroid or non steroidal anti-inflammatory Placebo: Control
11
Ketorolac
one time dose of 30mg of IV Ketorolac at time of closure Intravenous Ketorolac: To assess the efficacy of the meds for dysphagia and dysphonia following ACDF
10
Dexamethasone
one time dose of 10mg of IV dexamethasone at the time of closure Intravenous Dexamethasone: To assess the efficacy of the meds for dysphagia and dysphonia following ACDF
12
Total33

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up111011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicKetorolacDexamethasoneTotalControl
Age, Continuous— years
Number of participants per study arm10 Participants12 Participants33 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants11 Participants32 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants7 Participants17 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 100 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 100 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 100 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification

The Bazaz grading system (0-none; 1-Mild; 2-Moderate; 3-Severe) is used for dysphagia evaluation

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ControlPercentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification20 percentage of participants
KetorolacPercentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification20 percentage of participants
DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)

Percentage of patients with severe dysphagia based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).Scores on the EAT-10 greater than 15 are indicative of severe dysphonia.

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ControlPercentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)20 percentage of participants
KetorolacPercentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)0 percentage of participants
DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI)

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10 item pain intensity and daily activity questionnaire that measures daily limitations after cervical spine injury. There are 10 sections, and each section contains 6 statements.The statements are scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. 0: No disability or difficulty 1. Mild disability or difficulty 2. Moderate disability or difficulty 3. Severe disability or difficulty 4. Very severe disability or difficulty 5. Complete disability or difficulty Total Score: The scores from each of the 10 sections are summed to calculate the total score. The maximum possible score is 50, which would indicate severe disability, while a score of 0 indicates no disability.

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ControlMean Neck Disability Index (NDI)13.2 score on a scale
KetorolacMean Neck Disability Index (NDI)16.2 score on a scale
DexamethasoneMean Neck Disability Index (NDI)3.75 score on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).

Scores on the VHI-10 greater than 11 are indicative of clinically significant dysphonia.

Time frame: one year

Population: No placeholder numbers included; only one participant completed study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ControlPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).0 percentage of participants
KetorolacPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).20 percentage of participants
DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).25 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Median Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain

The Visual analogue scale is a line with numbers underneath it, with extremes marked no pain score of 0 (left) and the worst pain imaginable score of 10 (right).

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ControlMedian Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain2.6 score on a scale
KetorolacMedian Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain3.4 score on a scale
DexamethasoneMedian Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain1.75 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026