Skip to content

Forearm Position in Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Does Forearm Position Matter in Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis? A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04650477
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-12-02
Start date
2013-02-01
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2020-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biceps Tendon Disorder

Keywords

biceps, tenodesis, forearm, shoulder arthroscopy, position

Brief summary

The investigators aimed to compare two different forearm positions, extension-pronation (EP) or neutral, for fixation of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHB) in biceps tenodesis.

Detailed description

Long head of biceps pathologies have been regarded as a source of anterior shoulder pain and disability. Tenodesis is preferable surgical choice for especially young patients to to eliminate anterior shoulder pain. The optimal position of the elbow and forearm during tenodesis is a debated topic. The investigators aimed to evaluate pain and strength loss after biceps tenodesis fixed at extension-pronation (EP) and neutral positions. The investigators aimed to find the most appropriate and anatomical arm position that gives better clinical and functional results.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFixation while forearm in extension-pronation position

Fixation was performed after tenodesis in the extension-pronation position, which is the anatomically most suitable position of the biceps tendon.

Sponsors

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Participants with diagnosis of chronic biceps tendinitis

Exclusion criteria

\- Participants who had undergone rotator cuff repair surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the two groups in terms of functional score6 monthsThe investigators evaluated the functional results of the patients with the Ases score. 100 points is the best result in 17 questions.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026