Skip to content

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Tunneling Wounds

The Microbiome of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Tunneling Wounds

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04648631
Enrollment
15
Registered
2020-12-01
Start date
2021-02-26
Completion date
2022-07-28
Last updated
2024-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Keywords

tunneling wound

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to look at the change in the microbiome (bacterial composition) of an HS tunneling wound and examine if treatment with an antibiofilm surfactant wound gel (ABWG) (a topical medication that will fight bacteria attached to the surface of those tunnels) changes the bacterial composition of the wounds.

Interventions

DEVICEantibiofilm surfactant wound gel (ABWG)

ABWG is a hydro-gel applied topically using a tongue depressor

Sponsors

Next Science LLC
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults 18 years old and older 2. Have diagnosis of HS confirmed by a dermatologist 3. Have at least one HS related tunneling wound that is at least 2 centimeters in length 4. Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Individuals who are not yet adults 2. Women known to be pregnant 3. Prisoners 4. Subjects, who in the opinion of the PI, cannot comply with home application of the treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in MicrobiomeBaseline, 4 weeksAs measured by quantitative 16s rDNA Polymerase Chain Reaction for bacterial enumeration from punch biopsy samples.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Lesion Severity as Measured by the Hurley StageBaseline, 4 weeksThe Hurley score is staged as: 1 (single or multiple abscesses without sinus tract formation or scarring); 2 (recurrent abscesses with one or more sinus tracts and scarring widely separated by normal skin); 3 (diffuse involvement with multiple sinus tracts and no intervening normal skin).
Change in Pain as Measured by VASBaseline, 4 weeksVisual Analog Scale (VAS) has a total score ranging from 0 to 10 with the higher score indicating greater pain.
Change HS Lesion ErythemaBaseline, 4 weeksAs measured the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale. CEA scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
Change in ExudateBaseline, 4 weeksExudate will be evaluated using a 5 point Likert scale from 0 (Dry) to 4 (Leaking).
Change in Range of MotionBaseline, 4 weeksAs measured by goniometer
Change in Lesion Severity as Measured by HS-PGABaseline, 4 weekHS Physician's Global Assessment (HS-PGA) Scale is a 6 point Likert scale from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe)
Number of Participants With Escalated Pain Medication Use4 weeksPain medication use will be reported as the number of participants that reports an escalation from using Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)/acetaminophen to opioids
Change in Number of Days of Work/School LostBaseline, 4 weeksAs self-reported by participants the number of days missed over the length of the study.
Number of Dressings Used4 weeksAs reported by participants
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by HiSQOLBaseline, 4 weeksHS quality of life (HiSQOL) has a total score ranging from 0 to 68, with higher scores indicating more severe impact on participant's quality of life
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by DLQIBaseline, 4 weeksDermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has a total score ranging from 0 to 30 with the lower score indicating higher health related quality of life
Number of Participants With Decreased Pain Medication Use4 weeksPain medication use will be reported as the number of participants that reports a decrease in the dose and/or frequency of pain medication use

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)
The participants in this group will be receiving the ABWG daily for 4 consecutive weeks. Antibiofilm surfactant wound gel (ABWG): ABWG is a hydro-gel that will be applied topically to both punch sites using a tongue depressor. In the days between visits, patients will apply one fingertip unit of the ABWG to the study wound daily.
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAntibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Microbiome

As measured by quantitative 16s rDNA Polymerase Chain Reaction for bacterial enumeration from punch biopsy samples.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

Population: Only 8 patients of the 15 had with enough tissue sample for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in MicrobiomeBaseline5.46 colony forming units per ml (CFU/ml)Standard Deviation 1.85
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Microbiome4 weeks3.88 colony forming units per ml (CFU/ml)Standard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Change HS Lesion Erythema

As measured the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale. CEA scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change HS Lesion ErythemaBaseline1.00 score on a scale
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change HS Lesion Erythema4 weeks2.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Exudate

Exudate will be evaluated using a 5 point Likert scale from 0 (Dry) to 4 (Leaking).

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in ExudateBaseline0.00 score on a scale
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Exudate4 weeks0.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Lesion Severity as Measured by HS-PGA

HS Physician's Global Assessment (HS-PGA) Scale is a 6 point Likert scale from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe)

Time frame: Baseline, 4 week

Population: this was an oversight of the translation of the protocol to the CRF that resulted in the 4 week data point not collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Lesion Severity as Measured by HS-PGABaseline3.00 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in Lesion Severity as Measured by the Hurley Stage

The Hurley score is staged as: 1 (single or multiple abscesses without sinus tract formation or scarring); 2 (recurrent abscesses with one or more sinus tracts and scarring widely separated by normal skin); 3 (diffuse involvement with multiple sinus tracts and no intervening normal skin).

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

Population: this was an oversight of the translation of the protocol to the CRF that resulted in the 4 week data point not collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Lesion Severity as Measured by the Hurley StageBaseline2.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Number of Days of Work/School Lost

As self-reported by participants the number of days missed over the length of the study.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Number of Days of Work/School LostBaseline0.00 Days
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Number of Days of Work/School Lost4 weeks0.00 Days
Secondary

Change in Pain as Measured by VAS

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) has a total score ranging from 0 to 10 with the higher score indicating greater pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Pain as Measured by VASBaseline1.40 units on a scale
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Pain as Measured by VAS4 weeks0.96 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life as Measured by DLQI

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has a total score ranging from 0 to 30 with the lower score indicating higher health related quality of life

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by DLQIBaseline12.00 score on a scale
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by DLQI4 weeks8.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life as Measured by HiSQOL

HS quality of life (HiSQOL) has a total score ranging from 0 to 68, with higher scores indicating more severe impact on participant's quality of life

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by HiSQOLBaseline44.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.04
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by HiSQOL4 weeks44.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.41
Secondary

Change in Range of Motion

As measured by goniometer

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected due to instrument needed for outcome measure was never received for the study, impeding the collection of this specific data point at both baseline and 4 weeks timepoint.

Secondary

Number of Dressings Used

As reported by participants

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Number of Dressings Used13.00 number of dressings
Secondary

Number of Participants With Decreased Pain Medication Use

Pain medication use will be reported as the number of participants that reports a decrease in the dose and/or frequency of pain medication use

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Number of Participants With Decreased Pain Medication Use4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Escalated Pain Medication Use

Pain medication use will be reported as the number of participants that reports an escalation from using Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)/acetaminophen to opioids

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Antibiofilm Surfactant Wound Gel (ABWG)Number of Participants With Escalated Pain Medication Use1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026