Skip to content

Primary vs Secondary Closure of Tracheo-cutaneous Fistulas

Primary vs Secondary Closure of Tracheo-cutaneous Fistulas: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04647968
Acronym
TRACH
Enrollment
44
Registered
2020-12-01
Start date
2021-01-12
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2024-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Tracheostomy Complications, Tracheostomy, Tracheostomy Complication

Keywords

tracheostomy, tracheostomy closure, tracheocutaneous fistula

Brief summary

The mean of this study is to compare primary and secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistulas and evaluate the differences in outcomes between both techniques.

Detailed description

In this study the investigators wish to recruit patients with a tracheotomy that has been installed for various reasons and that is ready for closure. The investigators intend to randomly allocate them a mean of closure, either primary or secondary. Once the fistula is closed, the investigators will follow them over a substantial period of time to compare outcomes of each mean of closing. Different questionnaires will be used to best evaluate a range of variables.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPrimary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula

This procedure will follow protocoled steps. It consists of a sutured closure of the tracheotomy following local anesthesia, done at bedside.

PROCEDURESecondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula

This procedure will follow protocoled steps. It consists of removing the tracheotomy canula and applying ointment and an Elastoplast on the site, which will be changed regularly until full healing of the wound.

Sponsors

Université de Sherbrooke
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No masking because it is a surgical procedure

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Being covered by the RAMQ * Having a tracheostomy either percutaneous or surgical * Being ready for canula removal and closure of the fistula

Exclusion criteria

* Presenting a contraindication to primary tracheotomy closure (granuloma) * Unable to consent * Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction in regards to the scar (change)1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 monthsThis outcome will evaluate patient satisfaction in regards to his tracheotomy scar following closure, measured with the Patient observer scar assesment scale (POSAS) validated questionnaire. A high score means a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory complications6 monthsThe investigators wish to establish whether there is a difference in respiratory complications occurence between the two means of closure.
Self reported quality of life related to dysphonia (change)1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 monthsThe goal of this outcome is to evaluate the self reported quality of life of patients following tracheotomy closed by either mean. The investigators are going to use the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) validated questionnaire to better assess this outcome. A high score means a worse outcome, the highest score being 40.
Healing time6 monthsThis outcome will evaluate time until full closure of the wound using both methods of closure.
Self reported quality of life related to dysphagia (change)1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 monthsThe goal of this outcome is to evaluate the self reported quality of life of patients following tracheotomy closed by either mean. We are going to use the EAT-10 validated questionnaire to better assess this outcome. A high score means a worse outcome, the highest score being 40.
Self reported quality of life related to dyspnea (change)1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 monthsThe goal of this outcome is to evaluate the self reported quality of life of patients following tracheotomy closed by either mean. This will be measure by the Dyspnea Index (DI) validated questionnaire but also with the follow-up history. The Dyspnea Index questionnaire has a maximum score of 40. A high score means a worse outcome.
Persisting fistula6 monthsThis outcome intends to evaluate the frequency of persisting fistula using either method of closure.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactSimon Brisebois, MD, MSC
simon.brisebois@usherbrooke.ca8193461110
Backup ContactBrigitte Routhier-Chevrier, MD
brigitte.routhier-chevrier@usherbrooke.ca8193461110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026