Skip to content

A Clinical Trial About the Safety of Surgical Treatment in Severe Primary Pontine Hemorrhage

Safety of Surgical Treatment In Severe Primary Pontine Hemorrhage Evacuation (STIPE): a Multicentric, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04647162
Acronym
STIPE
Enrollment
64
Registered
2020-11-30
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2023-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Disorders, Pontine Hemorrhage, Primary, Surgery

Brief summary

Primary pontine hemorrhage (PPH) is not common but is the most catastrophic subtype of intracerebral hemorrhage, with acute mortality between 30% and 60%. For severe PPH, defined as Glasgow Coma score (GCS) \<8 and hematoma volume≥5ml, the mortality rate is as high as 80-100%. Guidelines from the American Heart Association and European Stroke Organization do not make definite specifications. More than a century after Finkelnburg first explored the brainstem for hematoma, however, plenty of researches have shown surgery can save lives and improve the prognosis for selective patients and can be an effective and safe treatment. This study is proposed to validate the safety of surgical treatment in severe primary pontine hemorrhage.

Detailed description

The study is being conducted from Jan 2022 to Nov 2024 in 20 neurosurgical units. This STIPE trial is an investigator-initiated, parallel (3:1 to surgical HE or MT), multi-centre, randomized controlled open-label trial following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines and will be conducted from Jan 2022 to Nov 2024 in 20 Tertiary hospitals in China. The flow chart of the clinical trial is presented in Figure 1. Neurosurgeons involved in the study are senior investigators with good clinical experience in sPPH management. Moreover, all investigators are well trained centrally according to the requirements.

Interventions

PROCEDUREhematoma evacuation by craniotomy

The intervention method of hematoma evacuation is under craniotomy.

PROCEDUREhematoma evacuation by stereotactic puncture

The intervention method of hematoma evacuation is under stereotactic puncture.

PROCEDUREhematoma evacuation by neuroendoscopy

The intervention method of hematoma evacuation is under neuroendoscopy.

OTHERlife support

The treatments in medical group includes life support, nutrition support, and rehabilitation therapy。

Sponsors

West China Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A sample size of 60 would be required to demonstrate a significant level of 5% (two-sided) with 80% power. Considering the 6% missing rate during follow-up, the total sample size was 64 cases with 16 and 48 cases in MT and HE group, respectively.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of PPH: patients have acute hemorrhage mainly in pons with a definite history of hypertension. 2. GCS 5\ 7 and HV≥5ml on admission (the HV in intraventricular system being excluded). 3. Family members consenting to randomize and signing informed consent form (ICF). 4. Time from onset to admission less than 24 hours. 5. Age:18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

1. Structural lesions such as brainstem cavernous malformation, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm, tumor apoplexy. 2. GCS≥8 and HV\<5ml. 3. Time from onset to admission over 24 hours. 4. Patients with platelet count \< 100,000, International Normalized Ratio (INR)\> 1.4, or an elevated prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). 5. Multiple ICH. 6. Accompanying hydrocephalus that requires surgical management 7. Irreversible brainstem failure (bilateral fixed, dilated pupils and extensor motor posturing, GCS≤4). 8. A previous history of ICH. 9. Any serious concurrent illness that would interfere with the safety assessments including hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, cardiovascular, endocrinologic, immunologic, and hematologic disease. 10. Pregnant patients. 11. Patients' family members refuse HE. 12. Any other condition that the investigator believes would present a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated. 13. Participating in another simultaneous trial of ICH treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Outcome Number 1: Rate of Mortality30 days from randomizationPercentage of participants who died during the first 30 days after randomization.
Safety Outcome Number 2: Rate of Cerebritis, Meningitis, Bacterial Ventriculitis30 days from randomizationPercentage of participants who had a bacterial brain infection (cerebritis, meningitis, ventriculitis) within 30 days of randomization.
Safety Outcome Number 3: Rate of Symptomatic Rebleeding72 hours post surgeryThe difference in the rate of symptomatic rebleeding 72 hours post surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (EGOS) at 180 days and 365 days180 days and 365 days after surgeryThe Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (EGOS) at 180 days and 365 days
the rate of hematoma clearance 3 days after surgery3 days after surgerythe rate of hematoma clearance 3 days after surgery
the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 180 days and 365 days180 days and 365 days after surgerythe National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 180 days and 365 days
The 5-level EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) version (EQ-5D-5L) at 180 days and 365 days180 days and 365 days after surgeryThe EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The former descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The latter is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.
all-cause mortality at 365 days365 days after surgeryall-cause mortality at 365 days
neurological functional status of 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 365 days measured by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), GCS and GOS.30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 365 days after surgeryneurological functional status of 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 365 days measured by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), GCS and GOS.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactChao You, MD
youchao@vip.126.com+86 028-85422488
Backup ContactQiang He, MD
heqiang629@126.com+86 15099189463

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026