Skip to content

Feasibility of Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation to Reduce Beta-amyloid Load and Improve Memory

Feasibility of Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation to Reduce Beta-amyloid Load and Improve Memory

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04646499
Enrollment
14
Registered
2020-11-30
Start date
2021-01-18
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2023-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

This project assessed the feasibility of transcranial alternating current stimulation in the gamma band to lower beta-amyloid load and improve memory performance.

Detailed description

Thirteen individuals with aMCI received eight 60-minute sessions of 40-Hz (gamma) transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in a single-arm design. Outcome measures were assessed pre- and post-intervention.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial alternating current stimulation

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) will be applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English speaking * Grade 12 or more education * Normal or corrected to normal vision and hearing * Ability to complete cognitive tasks * Ability to cooperate and comply with all study procedures * Ability to tolerate tACS * Self-reported memory complaint * Diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment * Amyloid positive

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological or psychiatric disorders other than mild cognitive impairment * Receiving investigational medications or have participated in a trial with investigational medications within last 30 days * Family history of epilepsy * Implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker) * Prior head trauma * Pregnant * IQ \< 80 * Taking cholinesterase inhibitory, memantine, or psychotropic medication * Taking anti-depressants or anti-anxiety medication * Color blind * Substance abuse * Glaucoma * Macular degeneration * Amblyopia (lazy eye) * Strabismus (crossed eyes)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Side EffectsAverage of all post-tACS sessions, up to 1 monthSide effects were measured on a scale from 0 (not noticable) to 10 (not tolerable): headache, neck pain, scalp pain, tingling, itching, burning sensation, increased sleepiness, trouble concentrating, acute mood change, and phosphenes. Average rating across all measures reported as indicator of side effects.
Drop Outpost-tACS, up to 1 monthDrop out rate will be assessed as the number of participants who withdraw or are withdrawn from the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Memory: Recall Changepre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Episodic memory was assessed pre and post intervention as the number of words correct during the short delay free recall portion of the California Verbal Learning Test. Change was assessed as post minus pre. Greater increase is better.
Memory: Fluency Changepre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Episodic memory fluency was assessed pre and post intervention from performance on the FAS task. Unit of measurement is the number of words names starting with the letter f, a, or s. Change was calculated as post minus pre. Greater increase is better.
Change in Taupre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Plasma tau levels was assessed pre and post intervention. Change was calculated as post minus pre. Greater decrease is better.
Memory: Paired Associates Changepre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Episodic memory was assessed pre and post intervention from memory accuracy for a paired associates task for visual objects. Change was assessed post minus pre. Greater increase is better.
Beta Amyloid Load Changepre-tACS (baseline) and post-tACS (1 month)Change in plasma-based beta amyloid (AB) load was assessed as the AB42/40 ratio, calculated as post minus pre AB42/40 ratio. Greater increase is better.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gamma Stimulation Group
This group received gamma stimulation Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
13
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGamma Stimulation Group
Age, Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Beta Amyloid0.06 unitless ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.02
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Memory: Fluency14.67 number of items named
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.78
Memory: Paired Associates60 percentage of items correctly remembered
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
Memory: Recall6.54 number of items correctly remembered
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.29
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
Tau3.38 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Drop Out

Drop out rate will be assessed as the number of participants who withdraw or are withdrawn from the study.

Time frame: post-tACS, up to 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gamma Stimulation GroupDrop Out1 Participants
Primary

Side Effects

Side effects were measured on a scale from 0 (not noticable) to 10 (not tolerable): headache, neck pain, scalp pain, tingling, itching, burning sensation, increased sleepiness, trouble concentrating, acute mood change, and phosphenes. Average rating across all measures reported as indicator of side effects.

Time frame: Average of all post-tACS sessions, up to 1 month

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gamma Stimulation GroupSide Effects0.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Beta Amyloid Load Change

Change in plasma-based beta amyloid (AB) load was assessed as the AB42/40 ratio, calculated as post minus pre AB42/40 ratio. Greater increase is better.

Time frame: pre-tACS (baseline) and post-tACS (1 month)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gamma Stimulation GroupBeta Amyloid Load Change0.0008 unitless ratioStandard Deviation 0.006
p-value: 0.34Sign test
Secondary

Change in Tau

Plasma tau levels was assessed pre and post intervention. Change was calculated as post minus pre. Greater decrease is better.

Time frame: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gamma Stimulation GroupChange in Tau0.27 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.72
p-value: 0.31Sign test
Secondary

Memory: Fluency Change

Episodic memory fluency was assessed pre and post intervention from performance on the FAS task. Unit of measurement is the number of words names starting with the letter f, a, or s. Change was calculated as post minus pre. Greater increase is better.

Time frame: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gamma Stimulation GroupMemory: Fluency Change1.5 number of items namedStandard Deviation 2.6
p-value: 0.049Sign test
Secondary

Memory: Paired Associates Change

Episodic memory was assessed pre and post intervention from memory accuracy for a paired associates task for visual objects. Change was assessed post minus pre. Greater increase is better.

Time frame: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gamma Stimulation GroupMemory: Paired Associates Change11.5 percent correctStandard Deviation 21
p-value: 0.083Sign test
Secondary

Memory: Recall Change

Episodic memory was assessed pre and post intervention as the number of words correct during the short delay free recall portion of the California Verbal Learning Test. Change was assessed as post minus pre. Greater increase is better.

Time frame: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gamma Stimulation GroupMemory: Recall Change1.5 words correctStandard Deviation 2.1
p-value: 0.024Sign test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026