Skip to content

A Randomized Trial of Exparel vs Saline in Opioid Reduction of Pain Management Following Lumbar Spine Surgeries.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) When Compared to Saline Control in Reducing Opioid Utilization for Pain Management in Postoperative Lumbar Spine Surgeries.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04644796
Acronym
Exparel
Enrollment
34
Registered
2020-11-25
Start date
2021-02-10
Completion date
2022-06-13
Last updated
2023-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Spine Degeneration

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to establish a relationship between liposomal bupivacaine surgical site injection and postop opioid utilization.

Detailed description

Multiple studies have shown that people who are taking opioids for acute pain have a greater likelihood of long-term opioid use. Many efforts have been made to reduce postop pain and opioid use, including developments in incisional site injections of local anesthetics, continuous incisional site anesthetic pain pumps, as well as multimodal comprehensive pain management, yet patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries continue to depend on opioids for relief. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) (Exparel) is a novel formulation of long-acting bupivacaine, lasting for up to 72 hours following injection. LB has been shown to be efficacious in reducing postop pain and opioid utilization in several different surgical settings, however its utility in spine surgeries has still yet to be established. The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine vs saline in lumbar spine surgeries in reducing opioid utilization as well as determine if there difference patient reported outcomes and length of hospital stay.

Interventions

DRUGsaline 0.9%

Patients included in the placebo group will have their incisional site infused, targeting the paraspinal muscles with sterile saline at the end of their surgery.

DRUGLiposomal bupivacaine

Patients included in the treatment group will have their incisional site infused, targeting the paraspinal muscles with liposomal bupivacaine at the end of their surgery.

Sponsors

University of Missouri-Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Liposomal bupivacaine can be differentiated visually from normal saline. In order to blind the surgeons from treatment vs control, the syringes containing the medication or saline will be sheathed by the investigational drug study department.

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the placebo group. Patients in the study group will receive liposomal bupivacaine at the end of the procedure (following fascial closure, but prior to superficial closure), while patients in the placebo group will receive sterile saline. The injectate should be injected slowly and deeply, infusing \ 1-2 mL according to manufacture guidelines for infiltration. According to these guidelines, injection should utilize a moving needle technique (inject while withdrawing the needle) at multiple locations surrounding the incision(s) to achieve maximal effect. Care will be taken to aspirate prior to injection to minimize the risk of intravascular injection of medication.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing isolated lumbar spine procedures using a posterior approach. * Surgical spine procedures include: * Single-level lumbar spine surgeries with or without fusion * Multi-level lumbar spine surgeries with or without fusion

Exclusion criteria

* Procedures involving intrathecal space * Patients with documented allergy to local anesthetics (bupivacaine, lidocaine, procaine, benzocaine). * Acute lumbar trauma that requires immediate spine stabilization * Revision of failed back surgeries (including nonunion and malunion) * Revision of wound or hardware * Contraindication to regional anesthesia * Patients with chronic use of opioid medications * Liver dysfunction (INR \> 1.5, albumin \<2.8g/dl, bilirubin \>2mg/dl) * Renal dysfunction (eGFR \< 60ml/min/1.73m2) * Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring continuous oxygen supplementation * Unable to give informed consent * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Opioid UtilizationUntil final follow-up, up to 8 weeks.Comparing post operative opioid usage reduction between treatment and placebo group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Operative Pain ScoresUntil final follow-up or up to 8 weeks after surgery date, whichever comes first.Comparing post operative pain scores between treatment and placebo group. Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score with scale 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain of your life.
Length of StayUntil final follow-up, up to 8 weeks.Determining how long patient is in hospital.
Operative Data and ComplicationsUntil final follow-up, up to 8 weeks.Comparing intraoperative complications, acute postoperative complication, and opioid complications.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liposomal Bupivacaine
Patients in this group will be given the study drug (liposomal bupivacaine). Liposomal bupivacaine: Patients included in the treatment group will have their incisional site infused, targeting the paraspinal muscles with liposomal bupivacaine at the end of their surgery.
17
Placebo Group
Patients in this group will be given the placebo (sterile saline). saline 0.9%: Patients included in the placebo group will have their incisional site infused, targeting the paraspinal muscles with sterile saline at the end of their surgery.
17
Total34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo GroupTotalLiposomal Bupivacaine
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants18 Participants9 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous65 years64 years63 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants34 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants24 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Postoperative Opioid Utilization

Comparing post operative opioid usage reduction between treatment and placebo group.

Time frame: Until final follow-up, up to 8 weeks.

Population: Discrepancy comes from patients not reporting morphine milligram equivalents on survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GroupPostoperative Opioid Utilization4.82 morphine milligram equivalentsStandard Deviation 10.02
Liposomal BupivacainePostoperative Opioid Utilization9.17 morphine milligram equivalentsStandard Deviation 19.36
Secondary

Length of Stay

Determining how long patient is in hospital.

Time frame: Until final follow-up, up to 8 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GroupLength of Stay42.69 HoursStandard Deviation 40.62
Liposomal BupivacaineLength of Stay29.51 HoursStandard Deviation 19.32
Secondary

Operative Data and Complications

Comparing intraoperative complications, acute postoperative complication, and opioid complications.

Time frame: Until final follow-up, up to 8 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo GroupOperative Data and ComplicationsIntraoperative ComplicationsNone17 Participants
Placebo GroupOperative Data and ComplicationsAcute Postoperative ComplicationYes2 Participants
Placebo GroupOperative Data and ComplicationsOpioid ComplicationsNone17 Participants
Placebo GroupOperative Data and ComplicationsIntraoperative ComplicationsYes0 Participants
Placebo GroupOperative Data and ComplicationsOpioid ComplicationsYes0 Participants
Placebo GroupOperative Data and ComplicationsAcute Postoperative ComplicationNone15 Participants
Liposomal BupivacaineOperative Data and ComplicationsOpioid ComplicationsYes0 Participants
Liposomal BupivacaineOperative Data and ComplicationsIntraoperative ComplicationsNone17 Participants
Liposomal BupivacaineOperative Data and ComplicationsAcute Postoperative ComplicationNone16 Participants
Liposomal BupivacaineOperative Data and ComplicationsAcute Postoperative ComplicationYes1 Participants
Liposomal BupivacaineOperative Data and ComplicationsOpioid ComplicationsNone17 Participants
Liposomal BupivacaineOperative Data and ComplicationsIntraoperative ComplicationsYes0 Participants
Secondary

Post Operative Pain Scores

Comparing post operative pain scores between treatment and placebo group. Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score with scale 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain of your life.

Time frame: Until final follow-up or up to 8 weeks after surgery date, whichever comes first.

Population: Reason for participant discrepancy is patients did not fill our VAS pain score survey following surgery.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GroupPost Operative Pain Scores4.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Liposomal BupivacainePost Operative Pain Scores4.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026