Skip to content

The Doctors for Coronavirus Prevention Project Thanksgiving / Christmas Messaging Campaign

The Doctors for Coronavirus Prevention Project Thanksgiving / Christmas Messaging Campaign

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04644328
Enrollment
820
Registered
2020-11-25
Start date
2020-11-12
Completion date
2021-02-11
Last updated
2021-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Covid19

Brief summary

Facebook ads with physician-delivered videos were shown before the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays and focused on staying safe during the COVID pandemic by limiting travel and mask-wearing.

Detailed description

The investigators used Facebook ads to show a 20 second video clip recorded by Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard and Lynn Community health center doctors (6 people in all) to approximately 20,000,000 Facebook users. The ads will be shown before the Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday and will focus on staying safe - limiting travel and mask-wearing. The investigators will randomize exposure to the ad campaign at the ZIP code or county level to ask: Do the videos change mobility and Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday travel? Do they reduce the spread of COVID-19? Are there spillover impacts from the video messages? For example, if individuals decide to stay home, then do the geographical regions that tend to be visited by people from treated areas experience any effects, either through information spillovers or through a reduction in travel?

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFacebook Ads on the importance of staying safe during the Thanksgiving / Christmas holiday

Facebook ads to show a 15 second video clip recorded by MGH, Harvard and Lynn Community health center and other health care professionals. The ads will be shown before the Thanksgiving/Christmas holiday and will focus on staying safe - limiting travel and mask-wearing. The investigators will randomize exposure to the ad campaign at the ZIP code or county level.

Sponsors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Harvard University
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
Stanford University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A total of 13 states, comprising 829 counties, centrally report COVID-19 cases at the ZCTA level. Two separate experiments were run within the study, one around Thanksgiving and one around Christmas. For each experiment, approximately half of the counties were randomized to high-intensity treatment with the remaining randomized to low-intensity treatment. In high-intensity counties, 3/4 of ZCTAs were treated and 1/4 were not. In low-intensity counties, 1/4 of ZCTAs were treated and 3/4 were not. In treated ZCTAs, Facebook users received ads with messages from physicians and other health personnel urging them to stay home and wear masks to stop the spread of COVID-19. Users in non-treated ZCTAs received no such ads. After exclusions, 820 counties were randomized to high- or low-intensity treatment during Thanksgiving and 767 counties were during Christmas.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Individuals viewing the ads must be Facebook users, 18 years and older. Facebook will decide specifically which users receive the messages within a target geographical area (zip or county).

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Facebook Movement MetricNovember 26, 2020 (Thanksgiving); December 24-25, 2020 (Christmas); February 2-29, 2020 (Baseline benchmark)The change in movement metric is the percent change in distance covered in a day compared to the same day of the week in the benchmark period of February 2-29, 2020, by people who started the day in a particular location. We define holiday travel as travel during the three days preceding each holiday, since the available data does not allow us to compute the impact of the intervention on the return travel (after the holiday). The reason is that the mobility data describes the behavior throughout the day, for people who were in each county that morning. Since the campaign was targeted based on home location, we can only capture its impact on travel away from home, not back home.
Percentage Leaving Home on Day of HolidayNovember 26, 2020 (Thanksgiving); December 24-25, 2020 (Christmas)The Facebook stay put metric is the percentage of people who stay within a small geographical area (a tile of 600m\*600m in which they started the day). We use it to compute the share of people leaving home on the day of the holiday (i.e. this variable = 1 - stay put on the day of the holiday).
Inverse Hyperbolic Sine of COVID-19 CasesDecember 1-14 (Thanksgiving arms) and January 1-14 (Christmas arms)Inverse hyperbolic sine of COVID-19 cases during a 14 day period starting 5 days after each holiday

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge of COVID-19 Prevention Message (Recall of ad, Intent to Travel, Mask Wearing and Beliefs About Travel)up to one monthFacebook will ask a set of users in treated zip codes to answer four survey questions (each user answers only one question each). A small within-zip control group will be held from being treated, enabling comparisons between those who see the videos and those who don't. These questions will be asked a few days after the ad is shown on the User's feed and will include 1) recall of the ad; 2) intention of traveling over holiday; 3) intention of wearing a mask; and 4) beliefs about whether people should travel over holiday.
Average Number of Tiles People Occupy (Mobility Measure)up to one monththis measures each day how much people move around by counting the number of level-16 Bing tiles they are seen in within a day. People seen in more tiles are probably moving around more, while people seen in fewer are probably moving around less. Each day take eligible people in a given region and compute the number of distinct tiles they were seen in. This is aggregated to the county level.
Percentage of Eligible Participants Only Observed in a Single Level-16 Bing Tile (no Change in Movement)up to one monthFacebook Stay-put data: this measures each day the percentage of eligible people who are only observed in a single level-16 Bing tile (600m x 600m) during the course of a day aggregated to they county level.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The 13 states which centrally report COVID-19 cases at the ZCTA level contained 829 counties. At Thanksgiving, 9 counties were excluded due to data limitations; at Christmas, 62 counties were excluded due to data limitations and potential negative impacts of treatment in rural, conservative areas resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High-Intensity Counties
Treatment: Individuals received approximately 3 Facebook ads over a 2-week period. Each ad contained a short video recorded by a physician using a script that discusses the importance of staying safe during Thanksgiving or Christmas by considering not traveling and using a mask when appropriate. Randomization to treatment: The investigators randomized exposure to the ad campaign as follows. The 13 states which centrally report COVID-19 cases at the ZCTA level contained 829 counties. At Thanksgiving, 9 counties were excluded due to data limitations; at Christmas, 62 counties were excluded due to data limitations and potential negative impacts of treatment in rural, conservative areas resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. Approximately half of the counties were randomized to high-intensity treatment with the remaining randomized to low-intensity treatment. In high-intensity counties, 3/4 of ZCTAs were treated (i.e., Facebook users in those ZCTAs received ads) and 1/4 were not. In low-intensity counties, 1/4 of ZCTAs were treated and 3/4 were not.
0
High-Intensity Counties
Treatment: Individuals received approximately 3 Facebook ads over a 2-week period. Each ad contained a short video recorded by a physician using a script that discusses the importance of staying safe during Thanksgiving or Christmas by considering not traveling and using a mask when appropriate. Randomization to treatment: The investigators randomized exposure to the ad campaign as follows. The 13 states which centrally report COVID-19 cases at the ZCTA level contained 829 counties. At Thanksgiving, 9 counties were excluded due to data limitations; at Christmas, 62 counties were excluded due to data limitations and potential negative impacts of treatment in rural, conservative areas resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. Approximately half of the counties were randomized to high-intensity treatment with the remaining randomized to low-intensity treatment. In high-intensity counties, 3/4 of ZCTAs were treated (i.e., Facebook users in those ZCTAs received ads) and 1/4 were not. In low-intensity counties, 1/4 of ZCTAs were treated and 3/4 were not.
410
Low-Intensity Counties
Control: Individuals did not receive ads containing short physician-recorded videos. Randomization to treatment: The investigators randomized exposure to the ad campaign as follows. The 13 states which centrally report COVID-19 cases at the ZCTA level contained 829 counties. At Thanksgiving, 9 counties were excluded due to data limitations; at Christmas, 62 counties were excluded due to data limitations and potential negative impacts of treatment in rural, conservative areas resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. Approximately half of the counties were randomized to high-intensity treatment with the remaining randomized to low-intensity treatment. In high-intensity counties, 3/4 of ZCTAs were treated (i.e., Facebook users in those ZCTAs received ads) and 1/4 were not. In low-intensity counties, 1/4 of ZCTAs were treated and 3/4 were not.
0
Low-Intensity Counties
Control: Individuals did not receive ads containing short physician-recorded videos. Randomization to treatment: The investigators randomized exposure to the ad campaign as follows. The 13 states which centrally report COVID-19 cases at the ZCTA level contained 829 counties. At Thanksgiving, 9 counties were excluded due to data limitations; at Christmas, 62 counties were excluded due to data limitations and potential negative impacts of treatment in rural, conservative areas resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. Approximately half of the counties were randomized to high-intensity treatment with the remaining randomized to low-intensity treatment. In high-intensity counties, 3/4 of ZCTAs were treated (i.e., Facebook users in those ZCTAs received ads) and 1/4 were not. In low-intensity counties, 1/4 of ZCTAs were treated and 3/4 were not.
410
Total820

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh-Intensity CountiesLow-Intensity CountiesTotal
Baseline fortnightly cases
Christmas (Period 2)
654.77 Individuals598.54 Individuals626.84 Individuals
Baseline fortnightly cases
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
683.90 Individuals496.70 Individuals590.30 Individuals
Baseline fortnightly deaths
Christmas (Period 2)
5.70 Individuals
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.07
5.07 Individuals
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
5.38 Individuals
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.19
Baseline fortnightly deaths
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
5.51 Individuals
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.35
4.64 Individuals
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.08
5.07 Individuals
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.63
Baseline leave home
Christmas (Period 2)
82.40 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.43
82.44 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
82.42 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.41
Baseline leave home
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
82.33 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.42
82.49 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.53
82.41 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.47
Baseline movement metric
Christmas (Period 2)
-8.69 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.88
-9.09 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.56
-8.89 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.72
Baseline movement metric
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
-8.58 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
-8.88 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.42
-8.73 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.77
Missing baseline Facebook outcomes
Christmas (Period 2)
0.11 Proportion of counties
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
0.13 Proportion of counties
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
0.12 Proportion of counties
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
Missing baseline Facebook outcomes
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
0.13 Proportion of counties
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34
0.17 Proportion of counties
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.38
0.15 Proportion of counties
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.36
Population in 2019
Christmas (Period 2)
116,787 individuals122,875 individuals119,811 individuals
Population in 2019
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
122,491 individuals102,818 individuals112,654 individuals
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Christmas (Period 2)
NA ProportionNA ProportionNA Proportion
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
NA ProportionNA ProportionNA Proportion
Share Democrats
Christmas (Period 2)
0.37 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.37 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.37 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
Share Democrats
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
0.36 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.35 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.36 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
Share Republicans
Christmas (Period 2)
0.61 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.61 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.61 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
Share Republicans
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
0.62 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.16
0.63 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
0.62 Proportion of county voters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
Share urban
Christmas (Period 2)
0.48 Proportion of county ZCTAs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
0.50 Proportion of county ZCTAs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
0.49 Proportion of county ZCTAs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
Share urban
Thanksgiving (Period 1)
0.47 Proportion of county ZCTAs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34
0.44 Proportion of county ZCTAs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34
0.46 Proportion of county ZCTAs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Facebook Movement Metric

The change in movement metric is the percent change in distance covered in a day compared to the same day of the week in the benchmark period of February 2-29, 2020, by people who started the day in a particular location. We define holiday travel as travel during the three days preceding each holiday, since the available data does not allow us to compute the impact of the intervention on the return travel (after the holiday). The reason is that the mobility data describes the behavior throughout the day, for people who were in each county that morning. Since the campaign was targeted based on home location, we can only capture its impact on travel away from home, not back home.

Time frame: November 26, 2020 (Thanksgiving); December 24-25, 2020 (Christmas); February 2-29, 2020 (Baseline benchmark)

Population: Rural, conservative counties were excluded during Christmas due to potential negative impacts of treatment resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. The two periods have been entered as rows to avoid double-counting counties.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
High-Intensity CountiesFacebook Movement MetricThanksgiving (Period 1)-6.082 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
High-Intensity CountiesFacebook Movement MetricChristmas (Period 2)-2.603 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
Low-Intensity CountiesFacebook Movement MetricThanksgiving (Period 1)-5.320 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
Low-Intensity CountiesFacebook Movement MetricChristmas (Period 2)-1.823 Percent change relative to Feb 2020
Primary

Inverse Hyperbolic Sine of COVID-19 Cases

Inverse hyperbolic sine of COVID-19 cases during a 14 day period starting 5 days after each holiday

Time frame: December 1-14 (Thanksgiving arms) and January 1-14 (Christmas arms)

Population: ZCTAs in rural, conservative counties were excluded during Christmas due to potential negative impacts of treatment resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. The two periods have been entered as rows to avoid double-counting ZCTAs. Note that there are more ZCTAs in the Christmas control than Thanksgiving control because the two periods were randomized separately and the number of ZCTAs varies by county.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
High-Intensity CountiesInverse Hyperbolic Sine of COVID-19 CasesThanksgiving (Period 1)4.333 Inverse hyperbolic sine of individuals
High-Intensity CountiesInverse Hyperbolic Sine of COVID-19 CasesChristmas (Period 2)4.368 Inverse hyperbolic sine of individuals
Low-Intensity CountiesInverse Hyperbolic Sine of COVID-19 CasesThanksgiving (Period 1)4.298 Inverse hyperbolic sine of individuals
Low-Intensity CountiesInverse Hyperbolic Sine of COVID-19 CasesChristmas (Period 2)4.442 Inverse hyperbolic sine of individuals
Primary

Percentage Leaving Home on Day of Holiday

The Facebook stay put metric is the percentage of people who stay within a small geographical area (a tile of 600m\*600m in which they started the day). We use it to compute the share of people leaving home on the day of the holiday (i.e. this variable = 1 - stay put on the day of the holiday).

Time frame: November 26, 2020 (Thanksgiving); December 24-25, 2020 (Christmas)

Population: Rural, conservative counties were excluded during Christmas due to potential negative impacts of treatment resulting from polarization in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. The two periods have been entered as rows to avoid double-counting counties.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
High-Intensity CountiesPercentage Leaving Home on Day of HolidayThanksgiving (Period 1)71.308 Percentage
High-Intensity CountiesPercentage Leaving Home on Day of HolidayChristmas (Period 2)72.859 Percentage
Low-Intensity CountiesPercentage Leaving Home on Day of HolidayThanksgiving (Period 1)71.468 Percentage
Low-Intensity CountiesPercentage Leaving Home on Day of HolidayChristmas (Period 2)72.852 Percentage
Secondary

Average Number of Tiles People Occupy (Mobility Measure)

this measures each day how much people move around by counting the number of level-16 Bing tiles they are seen in within a day. People seen in more tiles are probably moving around more, while people seen in fewer are probably moving around less. Each day take eligible people in a given region and compute the number of distinct tiles they were seen in. This is aggregated to the county level.

Time frame: up to one month

Secondary

Knowledge of COVID-19 Prevention Message (Recall of ad, Intent to Travel, Mask Wearing and Beliefs About Travel)

Facebook will ask a set of users in treated zip codes to answer four survey questions (each user answers only one question each). A small within-zip control group will be held from being treated, enabling comparisons between those who see the videos and those who don't. These questions will be asked a few days after the ad is shown on the User's feed and will include 1) recall of the ad; 2) intention of traveling over holiday; 3) intention of wearing a mask; and 4) beliefs about whether people should travel over holiday.

Time frame: up to one month

Secondary

Percentage of Eligible Participants Only Observed in a Single Level-16 Bing Tile (no Change in Movement)

Facebook Stay-put data: this measures each day the percentage of eligible people who are only observed in a single level-16 Bing tile (600m x 600m) during the course of a day aggregated to they county level.

Time frame: up to one month

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026