Constipation, Incontinence Bowel
Conditions
Brief summary
Our objective here is to improve the patient's compliance and accurate capture of patient reported bowel and abdominal symptoms, by utilizing a phone application that interactively records each bowel movement or leakage event and other bowel symptoms. Such an electronic stool diary may relieve the burden of using a paper daily stool diary. We will compare and validate the electronic stool diary with the paper stool diary.
Detailed description
Fecal incontinence consists of multiple and often unpredictable bowel movements and leakage of stool. Chronic constipation is associated with episodes of irregular and unpredictable bowel habits and difficulty with remembering symptoms. These features lead to a recall bias, and inaccurate recollection and/or documentation of symptoms that are critical for diagnosis and management. A daily stool diary has been used in clinical trials and in clinical practice to accurately record bowel symptoms. However, patients find these diary entries cumbersome or embarrassing to use, especially with bowel movements that occur outside of home resulting in loss of data or inaccurate collection of information. Also, many patients forget events especially when this bowel habit is irregular. Therefore, it is crucial to explore new ways of accurately, reliability, and more discretely collect bowel habit information, by using current technology that a majority of people have access to.
Interventions
OTHERPaper diary
Subjects will be asked to complete a 2 week paper stool diary.
OTHERElectronic APP diary
Subjects will be asked to complete a 2 week paper stool diary.
Sponsors
Augusta University
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
* Anyone older than 18 years with symptoms of Fecal Incontinence (FI), Constipation, or Healthy (i.e. no bowel issues). * Women of childbearing age will be asked if they are pregnant, and a confirmed negative response is given will be sufficient. No pregnancy test will be performed.
Exclusion criteria
* None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation of electronic APP diary information with paper form stool diary in healthy subjects | 2 weeks each | The stool diary parameters: number of bowel movements, number of leakages, stool consistency, urgency, time spent on toilet, feeling of incomplete evacuation,straining, gas and bloating recorded in the paper form stool diary over 2 weeks will be correlated with the electronic APP stool diary parameters using Pearson correlation in healthy subjects. |
| Correlation of electronic APP diary information with paper form stool diary in fecal incontinence subjects | 2 weeks each | The stool diary parameters; number of bowel movements, number of leakages, stool consistency, urgency, sensation before leakage, feeling of incomplete evacuation,use of pads and medication use recorded in the paper form stool diary over 2 weeks will be correlated with the electronic APP stool diary parameters using Pearson correlation in fecal incontinence subjects |
| The stool diary parameters | 2 weeks each | The stool diary parameters: number of bowel movements, stool consistency, urgency, time spent on toilet, feeling of incomplete evacuation,straining, gas and bloating recorded in the paper form stool diary over 2 weeks will be correlated with the electronic APP stool diary parameters using Pearson correlation in constipation subjects |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stool leakage | 2 weeks | Leakage characteristics-amount: 0- none, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3- excessive, will be compared between the APP and stool diary and between healthy subjects and patients with fecal incontinence. |
| Complete evacuation | 2 weeks | Feeling of complete evacuation, will be compared between the APP and stool diary and between healthy subjects and patients with constipation and fecal incontinence. |
| Stool frequency | 2 weeks | The number of bowel movements per week (BM), the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM), and the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM) will be compared between the APP and stool diary and between healthy subjects and patients with constipation and fecal incontinence. |
| Straining | 2 weeks | Stool straining will be compared between the APP and stool diary and between healthy subjects and patients with constipation. |
| Time spent of toilet | 2 weeks | Time spent on toilet will be compared between the APP and stool diary and between healthy subjects and patients with constipation. |
| Week 1 vs Week 2 reproducibility of APP and paper diary | 1 weeks | Compare the results for the first and the second week for the electronic APP data as well as paper data and examine the reproducibility. |
| Stool consistency | 2 weeks | Stool consistency (Bristol Stool scale, 1-7): 1-very hard stool, 4- normal, smooth stool, 7- watery stool, will be compared between the APP and stool diary and between healthy subjects and patients with constipation and fecal incontinence. |
| Bowel urgency | 2 weeks | Severity of bowel urgency- unable to postpone BM for more than 15 minutes, will be compared between the APP and stool diary and between healthy subjects and patients with constipation and fecal incontinence. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactSatish Rao, MD PhD
Backup ContactAmol Sharma, MD
Outcome results
None listed