Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled AZD1402 Administered for Four Weeks in Adults With Asthma on Medium-to-High Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids

A Two-part Phase IIa Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Multi-centre Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled AZD1402 Administered as a Dry Powder for Four Weeks in Adults With Asthma on Medium-to-High Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04643158
Acronym
APATURA
Enrollment
72
Registered
2020-11-24
Start date
2021-03-12
Completion date
2023-07-20
Last updated
2025-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

AZD1402, placebo, Anticalin® protein, dry powder inhaler, inhaled corticosteroids, efficacy, safety

Brief summary

This is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multi-centre, 2-part study to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled AZD1402. Part 1 will be performed in a Lead-in Cohort for each dose level to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) in a population with asthma controlled on medium dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-long acting beta agonists (LABA) before progressing to dosing in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA in Part 2. The study will recruit participants receiving treatment with medium dose ICS with LABA for Part 1 and participants receiving treatment with medium-to-high dose ICS with LABA for Part 2 (separate inhalers or combination product). Part 2 will be initiated following evaluation of safety and PK at the relevant dose level in Part 1a. The entire study period for each participant in both Parts 1 and 2, is approximately 3.5 months; a 2-week Screening Period, a 4 week Run-in Period, 4 weeks of Treatment Period, and 4 weeks of Follow-Up Period.

Detailed description

Part 1 of the study will be randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, and conducted in parallel for the 2 lower dose levels (Part 1a) followed by an unblinded safety review and escalation to the highest dose (Part 1b) dependent on the outcome of the safety review. Part 1a will consist of 30 participants who will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive 1 of the 2 lower AZD1402 dry power inhaler (DPI) doses (Dose 1 or Dose 2) or placebo in parallel. Part 1b will consist of 15 participants who will be randomised 2:1 to receive the highest AZD1402 DPI dose (Dose 3) or placebo. Part 1a Lead-in Cohort * AZD1402 Dose 1 * AZD1402 Dose 2 * Placebo Part 1b Lead-in Cohort * AZD1402 Dose 3 * Placebo Part 2 will be randomised, double blind, placebo controlled and will include approximately 165 participants randomised 2:1 (active to placebo) to evaluate 2 inhaled dose levels of AZD1402 versus placebo. Part 2 will be started after the unblinded safety review for Part 1a. Part 2 will include: * AZD1402 Dose 1 * AZD1402 Dose 2 * Placebo

Interventions

Randomised participants will receive oral inhalation of AZD1402, via DPI.

DRUGPlacebo

Randomised participants will receive oral inhalation of matching placebo via DPI.

DRUGShort acting beta agonist (SABA) (rescue medication)

In addition to study intervention, all participants will be provided with a SABA as rescue medication (eg, salbutamol/albuterol), to be used throughout the Run-in and Treatment Periods. All participants should refrain from taking a SABA as rescue medication 6 hours prior to pulmonary function tests. Dosage levels: 100 μg per nominal dose 90 μg per nominal dose pro re nata (as required) (PRN)

DRUGRun-in medications (ICS-LABA combination)

During the Run-in Period, the participants are required to maintain on their ICS-LABA dose. Controller medications (eg, ICS LABA) should remain at a stable dose and be taken after study intervention as applicable. These drugs are used as standard of care.

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who have a documented clinical diagnosis of asthma for ≥ 12 months before Visit 1. * Participants who are able to perform acceptable pulmonary function testing for FEV1. * Participants who are able to demonstrate the ability to use the study inhalation device properly. * Male participants must be surgically sterile or agree to use highly-effective contraceptives. * All female participants must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening. Female participants of non-childbearing potential, Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test before the administration of first dose of study intervention and must agree to use a highly-effective method of birth control. * Participant is a non smoker or an ex-smoker with a total smoking history of less than 10 pack-years. * Only for Part 1: Documented treatment with medium dose ICS with LABA for at least 6 months prior to Screening. ICS and LABA must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to Screening, during Screening and Run-in Periods and may be contained in a combination product or separate inhaler. No asthma exacerbations in last 12 months requiring oral or intravenous (IV) steroids or hospitalisation/ emergency room visit due to asthma. Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 70% predicted at Screening and start of Run-in. Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score of ≤ 1.0 at Screening and start of Run-in. * Only for Part 2: Documented evidence of asthma. Documented treatment with medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA for at least 6 months prior to Screening. ICS and LABA must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening, during Screening and Run-in Periods. If on asthma maintenance controller medications in addition to ICS-LABA, the dose of the additional controller medications must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening, during Screening and Run-in Periods. Pre bronchodilator FEV1 of 40% to 85% (inclusive) predicted at Screening and start of Run-in. Blood eosinophil count of ≥ 150 cells/μL and FeNO ≥ 25 ppb at Screening. Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score ≥ 1.5 at Screening. Specific Randomisation Criteria at Visit 3 * For Part 1: Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 70% predicted. At least 70% compliance with usual asthma controller ICS-LABA during Run-in Period (from Visit 2 to Visit 3) based on daily electronic diary (e-Diary). Minimum 80% compliance with ePRO completion. Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score of ≤ 1.0. C-reactive protein \< 5 mg/L on Day -1. * For Part 2: Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 40% to 85% (inclusive) predicted. Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score of ≥ 1.5. At least 70% compliance with usual asthma controller ICS-LABA during Run-in Period from (Visit 2 to Visit 3) based on daily e-Diary. Minimum 70% compliance with ePRO completion. C-reactive protein \< 10 mg/L at Visit 2. A FeNO of ≥ 25 ppb.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or who are planning to become pregnant during the study. * Known or suspected hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis/anaphylactoid reaction following any biologic therapy, or known history of drug hypersensitivity to any component of the study intervention formulation. * Evidence of any active clinically important pulmonary disease other than asthma, within 5 years at screening. * History of pulmonary or systemic disease, other than asthma, that are associated with elevated peripheral eosinophil counts. * History or clinical suspicion of any clinically relevant or active disease or disorder. * History of severe COVID-19 infection requiring hospitalisation within the last 12 months or clinical history compatible with long COVID (symptoms beyond 12 weeks of acute infection). * Confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 infection during Screening, Run-in or prior to randomisation. * Current malignancy or history of malignancy. * Significant history of recurrent or ongoing 'dry eye'. * Diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome. * High risk of infection suggesting abnormal immune function. * History of, or known significant infection or positivity at Screening period, including hepatitis B or C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). * Evidence of active tuberculosis. * Clinically significant lower respiratory tract infection not resolved within 4 weeks prior to Screening and during Run-in. * Clinically significant upper respiratory tract infection at Screening and during Run-in. * A helminth parasitic infection diagnosed within 24 weeks prior to the date informed consent is obtained. * Any clinically important ECG abnormalities. * Any clinically significant cardiac disease. * Uncontrolled hypertension. * History of life-threatening asthma attack or asthma attack requiring ventilation. * Part 2 only: History of 3 or more severe asthma exacerbations. * Daily rescue use of SABA ≥ 8 puffs for ≥ 3 consecutive days at any time during Run-in Period, before randomisation. * History of anaphylaxis. * Any clinically significant abnormalities in haematology. * Alanine aminotransferase or AST level ≥ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), confirmed by repeated testing during Screening Period. * History of, drug or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years prior to Screening. * Planned in-patient surgery, major dental procedure or hospitalisation during the study. * Prior/Concomitant Therapy: Systemic corticosteroid use, AZD1402, marketed or investigational biologicals such as monoclonal antibodies or chimeric biomolecules, investigational nonbiologic drug within 60 days prior to Screening and during Run-in, any immunosuppressive therapy, Live or attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks of Screening and during Run-in, Receipt of COVID-19 vaccine (vaccine or booster dose) within 30 days prior to randomisation, Immunoglobulin or blood products within 4 weeks of Screening and during Run-in, Any immunotherapy within 3 months of Screening and during Run-in. * Part 1 only: Additional asthma maintenance controller medications in addition to ICS-LABA (eg, leukotriene receptor inhibitors, theophylline, LAMA, chromones) within 3 months of Screening period and during Run-in.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From Screening (Week -6) until Follow-up (Day 56)The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1Baseline and Week 4The efficacy of inhaled AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was investigated.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Baseline, Day 12, Day 16, and Day 56The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryBaseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, and Day 56The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, and Day 56The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersDay 1 until Day 56ADA-positive samples were tested to investigate the immunogenicity of AZD1402.
Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4Baseline, Week 4The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. The ACQ was developed to measure asthma control. In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilation use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicated a worse outcome. The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and ≤ 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores \> 1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 4 weeksThe efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Peak expiratory flow was measured by the participants at home using a peak flow meter.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 4 weeksThe efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Peak expiratory flow was measured by the participants at home using a peak flow meter.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 4 weeksThe efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Severity scores for asthma symptoms were recorded twice daily in the morning and evening and documented in an e-Diary. Asthma symptom scores during night-time and day-time were assessed by the participant each morning and evening according to the following scoring system: 0: You have no asthma symptoms. 1: You are aware of your asthma symptoms but you can easily tolerate the symptoms. 2: Your asthma is causing you enough discomfort to cause problems with normal activities (or with sleep). 3: You are unable to do your normal activities (or to sleep) because of your asthma. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 4The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, Week 4The effect of AZD1402 compared to placebo on airway inflammation in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was investigated. To investigate the effect of AZD1402 on airway inflammation, the measurement of FeNO was performed in accordance with ATS/ERS guidelines. Standardised conditions with regard to exhalation flow rate and duration of exhalation were followed such that plateau definition could be evaluated over a minimum of 3 seconds.
Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From Screening (Week -6) until Follow-up (Day 56)The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, Week 4The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. The ACQ was developed to measure asthma control. In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilation use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicated a worse outcome. The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and ≤ 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores \> 1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.
Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 1 until Day 56The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 1 until Day 56The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Germany, Hungary, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted from 21 April 2021 to 20 July 2023 at 63 study centers in 10 countries.

Pre-assignment details

The screening period was of 2 weeks (Week -6 to Week -4) for both parts of the study. Informed Consent Form (ICF) was signed prior to screening procedures. All the study assessments were performed as per the schedule of assessment. Participants who met the eligibility criteria were randomized to study intervention in addition to receiving background local standard of care therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1
Randomised participants received oral inhalation of AZD1402 Dose 1 via DPI.
11
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2
Randomised participants received oral inhalation of AZD1402 Dose 2 via DPI.
10
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3
Randomised participants received oral inhalation of AZD1402 Dose 3 via DPI.
13
Part 1: Placebo
Randomised participants received oral inhalation of matching placebo via DPI.
16
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1
Randomised participants received oral inhalation of AZD1402 Dose 1 via DPI.
4
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 2
Randomised participants received oral inhalation of AZD1402 Dose 2 via DPI.
9
Part 2: Placebo
Randomised participants received oral inhalation of matching placebo via DPI.
9
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyGlobal/country situation0010000
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor0010010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1: AZD1402 Dose 1TotalPart 2: PlaceboPart 2: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2
Age, Continuous46.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
61.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
61.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
60.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
50.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
47.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6
43.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants71 Participants9 Participants8 Participants4 Participants16 Participants13 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants40 Participants4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants32 Participants5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 100 / 130 / 160 / 40 / 90 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 116 / 1010 / 138 / 163 / 45 / 96 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 100 / 130 / 160 / 41 / 90 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic Spirometry

The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, and Day 56

Population: The safety set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 1 evening-0.0338 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1794
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 morning-0.1225 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.129
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 evening-0.0648 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1579
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 14 morning-0.1157 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1231
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 28 morning-0.2199 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1933
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 56-0.2239 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.2096
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 56-0.1232 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1455
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 14 morning-0.1776 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1533
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 1 evening-0.2416 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.4113
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 evening-0.0884 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1082
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 morning-0.2134 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1975
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 28 morning-0.1673 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.2192
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 morning0.0187 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1338
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 evening0.0430 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1613
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 14 morning-0.0388 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.2225
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 56-0.0830 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1802
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 28 morning-0.0583 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1515
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 1 evening0.0031 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1841
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 28 morning-0.2050 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.229
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 56-0.1707 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.2345
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 morning-0.0913 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.2121
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 14 morning-0.0773 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1584
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 1 evening0.0318 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1362
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic SpirometryDay 7 evening0.0486 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.1474
Primary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)

The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, and Day 56

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 1 evening12.14 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 123.28
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 56 morning14.17 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 174.36
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 28 morning19.07 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 143.18
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 morning11.60 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 243.83
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Average change from baseline over the treatment period10.23 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 164.24
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 evening16.81 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 102.28
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 14 morning18.17 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 213.64
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 56 morning19.31 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.1
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 14 morning23.17 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 204.29
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 evening18.83 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 230.59
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 28 morning16.31 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 170.18
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Average change from baseline over the treatment period16.37 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 183.76
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 morning23.71 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 132.9
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 1 evening17.14 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 356.42
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 14 morning25.06 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 168.79
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 1 evening13.52 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 162.23
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 morning21.55 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.95
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 evening22.97 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 155.86
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 28 morning20.06 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 289.93
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 56 morning21.44 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 212.81
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Average change from baseline over the treatment period20.78 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 111.33
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 evening16.90 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 140.49
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Average change from baseline over the treatment period14.60 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 127.31
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 56 morning15.51 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 106.64
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 7 morning17.61 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 93.96
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 1 evening13.30 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 150.6
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 28 morning16.50 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 148.92
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)Day 14 morning31.32 Part per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 183.61
Primary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 12, Day 16, and Day 56

Population: The safety set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Baseline0.225 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.369
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 120.167 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.247
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 160.727 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.906
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 560.172 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.243
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 120.650 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.898
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 160.166 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.171
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 560.094 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.095
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Baseline0.109 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.08
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 161.093 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.761
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 120.485 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.542
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 560.119 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.081
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Baseline0.102 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.07
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 560.112 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.151
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 120.103 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.173
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Baseline0.094 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.09
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Day 160.088 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.091
Primary

Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.

Time frame: From Screening (Week -6) until Follow-up (Day 56)

Population: The safety set included all patients who were randomised and received any investigational product (IP).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to withdrawal from study0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE with outcome death0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE4 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE with outcome death0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP1 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to withdrawal from study0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE6 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE with outcome death0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE10 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP1 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to withdrawal from study0 Participants
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP1 Participants
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE8 Participants
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE with outcome death0 Participants
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to withdrawal from study0 Participants
Primary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1

The efficacy of inhaled AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was investigated.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1-0.0195 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1023
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV10.1529 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.0804
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1-0.0431 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.0777
p-value: 0.82895% CI: [-0.1934, 0.2406]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.03595% CI: [0.0143, 0.3778]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)NA Ratio
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)NA Ratio
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)6.059 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.5
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)NA Ratio
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)NA Ratio
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)NA Ratio
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)3.219 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 121.9
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)6.067 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 78.9
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)NA Ratio
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)NA Ratio
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Titers

ADA-positive samples were tested to investigate the immunogenicity of AZD1402.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The immunogenicity set included all participants in the safety set with at least one post-treatment ADA result (positive or negative). Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints. Participants in the Part 1: Placebo arm did not have any post-treatment ADA results and were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTreatment-induced ADA positive1280.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline (ADA prevalence)1280.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA persistently positive1280.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive with maximum titre > median of maximum titres3840.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive (ADA incidence)1280.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA transiently positiveNA Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA persistently positive640.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTreatment-induced ADA positive360.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive (ADA incidence)360.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline (ADA prevalence)360.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive with maximum titre > median of maximum titres1280.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA persistently positive320.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline (ADA prevalence)320.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive (ADA incidence)320.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTreatment-induced ADA positive320.0 Titer
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive with maximum titre > median of maximum titresNA Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTreatment-induced ADA positive240.0 Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline (ADA prevalence)240.0 Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive (ADA incidence)240.0 Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive with maximum titre > median of maximum titresNA Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive with maximum titre > median of maximum titres2560.0 Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTreatment-induced ADA positive400 Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersTE-ADA positive (ADA incidence)400 Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA persistently positive240.0 Titer
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline (ADA prevalence)400.0 Titer
Part 2: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) TitersADA persistently positive400.0 Titer
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)21.39 Liters/hour (L/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.3
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)32.33 Liters/hour (L/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 94.4
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)37.82 Liters/hour (L/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 132.7
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)NA Liters/hour (L/h)
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)NA Liters/hour (L/h)
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 2846.75 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63.3
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 123.15 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.9
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 2892.80 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 94.4
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 146.34 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.4
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 28264.4 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 132.7
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 28NA h*ng/mL
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 1NA h*ng/mL
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 1NA h*ng/mL
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)Day 28NA h*ng/mL
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 2844.26 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 604.9
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 116.32 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.8
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 28146.3 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 144.7
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 144.40 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.9
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 28379.4 h*ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 169.6
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 28NA h*ng/mL
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 1NA h*ng/mL
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 1NA h*ng/mL
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Day 28NA h*ng/mL
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 2820.17 Hours (h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 668.7
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 1NA Hours (h)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 287.669 Hours (h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 19.440 Hours (h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.4
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 288.546 Hours (h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.5
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 28NA Hours (h)
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 1NA Hours (h)
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 1NA Hours (h)
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)Day 28NA Hours (h)
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)

The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 283.986 Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.9
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 1NA Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 2810.46 Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 103
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 12.745 Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.2
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 15.864 Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.2
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 2830.97 Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 124.7
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 1NA Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 28NA Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 28NA Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)Day 1NA Nanograms Per Milliliter (ng/mL)
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 282.854 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66.3
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 11.702 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 285.145 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 96.8
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 12.917 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 53.6
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 2813.83 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 144.2
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 28NA ng/mL
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 1NA ng/mL
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 1NA ng/mL
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)Day 28NA ng/mL
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 280.03437 1/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 668.7
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 1NA 1/hour
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 280.09040 1/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 10.07343 1/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.4
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 280.08111 1/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.5
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 28NA 1/hour
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 1NA 1/hour
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 1NA 1/hour
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)Day 28NA 1/hour
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 1NA Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 2811.99 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 18.000 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 2817.83 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 111.47 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 2823.94 Hours
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 28NA Hours
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 28NA Hours
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)Day 1NA Hours
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 283.025 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 1NA Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 13.000 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 283.000 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 14.017 Hours
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 283.950 Hours
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 28NA Hours
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 28NA Hours
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 1NA Hours
Secondary

Part 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)

The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.

Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56

Population: The PK set included all patients in the safety set who had detectable PK data and with no major protocol deviations considered to impact on the analysis of PK data. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)622.5 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1007.5
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)322.9 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 109.7
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)466.3 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 172
Part 1: PlaceboPart 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)NA Liters
Part 2: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)NA Liters
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. The ACQ was developed to measure asthma control. In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilation use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicated a worse outcome. The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and ≤ 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores \> 1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 4-0.80 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over treatment period-0.75 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 4-0.71 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over treatment period-0.78 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 4-0.56 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over treatment period-0.56 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Peak expiratory flow was measured by the participants at home using a peak flow meter.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 418.68 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 3.94
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period14.20 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 10.37
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 4-15.81 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 28.63
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period-7.75 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 25.79
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 40.89 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 30.22
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period1.87 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 19.27
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Peak expiratory flow was measured by the participants at home using a peak flow meter.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 423.73 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 15.24
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period20.67 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 8.58
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 419.88 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 47.38
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period21.40 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 37.83
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 4-2.53 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 26.69
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period-5.54 Liters/minute (L/m)Standard Deviation 24.17
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Severity scores for asthma symptoms were recorded twice daily in the morning and evening and documented in an e-Diary. Asthma symptom scores during night-time and day-time were assessed by the participant each morning and evening according to the following scoring system: 0: You have no asthma symptoms. 1: You are aware of your asthma symptoms but you can easily tolerate the symptoms. 2: Your asthma is causing you enough discomfort to cause problems with normal activities (or with sleep). 3: You are unable to do your normal activities (or to sleep) because of your asthma. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 4-0.23 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period-0.10 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 40.07 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period0.02 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 4-0.04 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period-0.07 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment Period

The effect of AZD1402 compared to placebo on airway inflammation in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was investigated. To investigate the effect of AZD1402 on airway inflammation, the measurement of FeNO was performed in accordance with ATS/ERS guidelines. Standardised conditions with regard to exhalation flow rate and duration of exhalation were followed such that plateau definition could be evaluated over a minimum of 3 seconds.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 439.77 Parts per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.03
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period32.02 Parts per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 153.61
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 428.76 Parts per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 91.99
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period14.16 Parts per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 343.96
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodChange from baseline at Week 431.20 Parts per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 122.5
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment PeriodAverage change from baseline over the treatment period27.45 Parts per billion (ppb)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 102.83
p-value: 0.20295% CI: [-71.11, 31.72]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.59695% CI: [-55.57, 60.96]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 10.0233 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.0526
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 20.0028 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.0618
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 30.0160 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.114
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 40.0095 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1085
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 40.1500 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1898
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 10.1408 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1679
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 30.0431 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1676
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 20.0866 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1607
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.0252 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1754
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 20.1671 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.3323
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 30.1099 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1583
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment PeriodWeek 10.0101 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.1094
Secondary

Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.

Time frame: From Screening (Week -6) until Follow-up (Day 56)

Population: The safety set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE with outcome death0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE3 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to withdrawal from study0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE with outcome death0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE5 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE1 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to withdrawal from study0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to withdrawal from study0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE6 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE with outcome death0 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
Secondary

Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4

The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. The ACQ was developed to measure asthma control. In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilation use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicated a worse outcome. The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and ≤ 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores \> 1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who were randomised and received any IP. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' specifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4Responder3 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 1Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4Non-responder1 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4Responder7 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 2Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4Non-responder2 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4Responder3 Participants
Part 1: AZD1402 Dose 3Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4Non-responder6 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026