Skip to content

Mortality in Patients With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia Who Underwent Tracheostomy

Mortality in Patients With Severe SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia Who Underwent Tracheostomy Due to Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04642703
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-11-24
Start date
2020-03-03
Completion date
2021-11-30
Last updated
2020-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Covid19, Mechanical Ventilation, Tracheostomy

Brief summary

Background: Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in COVID-19 patients has been associated with a high mortality rate. In this context, the utility of tracheostomy has been questioned in this group of ill patients. This study aims to compare in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients with and without tracheostomy due to prolonged IMV Methods: Cohort study of adult COVID-19 patients subjected to prolonged IMV. Since the first COVID-19 case (March 3, 2020) up to November 30, 2020, all adult critical patients supported with IMV by 10 days or more at the Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile will be included in the cohort. Pregnant women and non-adult patients will be excluded. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory data, disease severity, and ventilatory support will be retrospectively collected from clinical records. The indication of tracheostomy, as part of our standard of care, will be indicated by a team of specialists in intensive care medicine, following national guidelines, and consented to by the patient's family. The 90-days mortality rate will be the primary outcome, whereas IMV days, hospital/CU length of stay, and the frequency of healthcare-associated infections will be the secondary outcomes. Also, a follow-up interview will be performed one year after a hospital discharged in order to assess the vital status and quality of life. The mortality of patients subjected to tracheostomy will be compared with the group of patients without tracheostomy by logistic regression models. Furthermore, propensity-score methods will be performed as a complementary analysis.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Chile
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* COVID-19 confirmed case * Invasive mechanical ventilation by 10 days or longer

Exclusion criteria

* Childhood * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
90-days mortality rateSince mechanical ventilation onset to death or 90-days follow-upDeath occurred during the follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital length of stayFrom hospital admission to discharge, up to 90 daysDays from hospital admission to discharge
ICU length of stayFrom first ICU admission to transfer at a lower complexity unit, up to 90 daysDays elapsed in the first ICU admission
Time of mechanical ventilationFrom orotracheal intubation to mechanical ventilation extubation (weaning), up to 90 daysDays of invasive ventilatory support
Health-care associated infectionsFrom hospital admission to discharge, up to 90 daysFrequency of respiratory, urinary tract, blood stream and invasive device-related infections
Long-term quality of life assessed by Short Form-36 Health Survey, SF-36One year after hospital dischargeScore on the the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). SF-36 is a 36-item questionary that assesses the quality of life on eight health-related aspects. It scores from 0 (maximum disability) to 100 (no disability): the lower the score the more disability.

Countries

Chile

Contacts

Primary ContactCarlos Romero, MD
mvenegash@hcuch.cl+56229788264
Backup ContactAbraham Gajardo, MD
intermediomedico@hcuch.cl+56229789162

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026