Skip to content

Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of INO-4800 for COVID-19 in Adults at High Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Exposure

Phase 2/3 Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of INO-4800, a Prophylactic Vaccine Against COVID-19 Disease, Administered Intradermally Followed by Electroporation in Adults at High Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Exposure

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04642638
Enrollment
1307
Registered
2020-11-24
Start date
2020-11-30
Completion date
2022-09-13
Last updated
2023-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronavirus Infection, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), COVID-19 Disease

Keywords

DNA vaccine, Electroporation, Healthy, COVID-19

Brief summary

This is a Phase 2/3, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of INO-4800 administered by intradermal (ID) injection followed by electroporation (EP) using CELLECTRA® 2000 device to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in participants at high risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus - 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The Phase 2 segment will evaluate immunogenicity and safety in approximately 400 participants at two dose levels across three age groups. Safety and immunogenicity information from the Phase 2 segment will be used to determine the dose level for the Phase 3 efficacy segment of the study involving approximately 7116 participants.

Interventions

INO-4800 was administered ID on Day 0 and Day 28.

EP using the CELLECTRA® 2000 device was administered following ID delivery of INO-4800 on Day 0 and Day 28.

DRUGPlacebo

Sterile saline sodium citrate (SSC) buffer (SSC-0001) was administered ID on Day 0 and Day 28.

Sponsors

Advaccine (Suzhou) Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Inovio Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Working or residing in an environment with high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 for whom exposure may be relatively prolonged or for whom personal protective equipment (PPE) may be inconsistently used, especially in confined settings. * Phase 2 only: Screening laboratory results within normal limits for testing laboratory or are deemed not clinically significant by the Investigator. * Be post-menopausal or be surgically sterile or have a partner who is sterile or use medically effective contraception with a failure rate of \< 1% per year when used consistently and correctly from Screening until 3 months following last dose (Phase 2) or until last dose (Phase 3). Key

Exclusion criteria

* Acute febrile illness with temperature higher than or equal to 100.4°F (38.0°C) or acute onset of upper or lower respiratory tract symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, sore throat). * Positive serologic or molecular (Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)) test for SARS-CoV-2 at Screening (this criterion applies to all Phase 2 participants and only applies after approximately 402 participants positive for SARS-CoV-2 serologic test are randomized in the Phase 3 segment of the study). * Pregnant or breastfeeding or intending to become pregnant or intending to father children within the projected duration of the trial starting from the Screening visit until 3 months following the last dose (Phase 2) or until last dose (Phase 3). * Known history of uncontrolled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) based on clusters of differentiation (CD4) count less than 200 cells per cubic millimeter (/mm\^3) or a detectable viral load within the past 3 months. * Is currently participating or has participated in a study with an investigational product within 30 days preceding Day 0. * Previous or planned receipt of an investigational (including Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or local equivalent authorization) or licensed vaccine for prevention or treatment of COVID-19, middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS), or severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (documented receipt of placebo in previous trial would be permissible for trial eligibility). * Respiratory diseases (e.g., asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) requiring significant changes in therapy or hospitalization for worsening disease during the 6 weeks prior to enrolment. * Immunosuppression as a result of underlying illness or treatment. * Lack of acceptable sites available for ID injection and EP. * Blood donation or transfusion within 1 month prior to Day 0. * Reported alcohol or substance abuse or dependence, or illicit drug use (excluding marijuana use). * Any illness or condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect the safety of the participant or the evaluation of any study endpoint.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayBaseline up to Week 6Whole blood and serum samples were collected for the cellular immunology assessment. The antigen-specific cellular immune response to INO-4800 was measured in spot-forming units per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (SFU/10\^6, PBMC) using ELISpot. No samples collected after Week 6 were analyzed.
Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayBaseline up to Week 6The immune responses to INO-4800 were measured using assays that included a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay. Immunology blood samples were collected at serial timepoints. No samples collected after Week 6 were analyzed.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Virologically-confirmed COVID-19 DiseaseFrom 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)Participants were virologically-confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. Participants with no prior exposure to COVID-19 at baseline were considered for the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)7 days following each dose: Day 0 (Days 0 to Day 7) and Day 28 (Days 28 to Day 35)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Participants were provided a diary to record the solicited systemic AEs. The solicited AEs were recorded for 7 days after each dose.
Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEsFrom first dose of study drug up to Day 56An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Unsolicited AEs were recorded for up to 28 days after administration of dose 2.
Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Phase 2: From first dose of study drug up to Day 393; Phase 3: From first dose of study drug up to Day 126An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly or birth defect.
Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)Phase 2: From first dose of study drug up to Day 393; Phase 3: From first dose of study drug up to Day 126An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AESI (serious or non-serious) is one of scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the sponsor can be appropriate.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Non-Severe COVID-19 DiseaseFrom 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)The efficacy of INO-4800 in the prevention of COVID-19 disease was evaluated according to the degrees of COVID-19 disease severity in participants. Participants were confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. The case definition of severe COVID-19 was participants with COVID-19 having clinical signs at rest indicative of severe systemic illness, respiratory failure, evidence of shock, significant acute renal, hepatic, or neurologic dysfunction, admission to an intensive care unit, or death. The case definition for non-severe COVID-19 was participants with confirmed COVID-19, and which did not meet the case definition of severe COVID-19.
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Death From All CausesBaseline up to Day 126
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Death From COVID-19 DiseaseFrom 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seropositive at Baseline) With Virologically-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 DiseaseFrom 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)Participants were virologically-confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. Participants with prior exposure to COVID-19 at baseline were considered for the analysis.
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by IFN-gamma ELISpot AssayBaseline up to Day 126Whole blood and serum samples were collected for the cellular immunology assessment. The antigen-specific cellular immune response to INO-4800 were measured using ELISpot.
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayBaseline up to Day 126The immune responses to INO-4800 were measured using assays that included a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Severe COVID-19 DiseaseFrom 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)The efficacy of INO-4800 in the prevention of COVID-19 disease was evaluated according to the degrees of COVID-19 disease severity in participants. Participants were confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. The case definition of severe COVID-19 was participants with COVID-19 having clinical signs at rest indicative of severe systemic illness, respiratory failure, evidence of shock, significant acute renal, hepatic, or neurologic dysfunction, admission to an intensive care unit, or death.
Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site Reactions7 days following each dose: Day 0 (Days 0 to Day 7) and Day 28 (Days 28 to Day 35)Reactions arising from the injectable product administration procedure were reported as injection site reactions. Injection site reactions were assessed in accordance with the 'Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials' (Food and Drug Administration \[FDA\] Guidance for Industry, September 2007). Participants were provided a diary to record the solicited injection site reactions. Local reactions to the injectable product such as pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, and induration/swelling were recorded. Injection site reactions were evaluated starting 30 minutes following the injection. The solicited injection site reactions were recorded for 7 days after each dose.
Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsFrom first dose of study drug up to Day 56Reactions arising from the injectable product administration procedure were reported as injection site reactions. Injection site reactions were assessed in accordance with the 'Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials' FDA Guidance for Industry, September 2007. Local reactions to the injectable product such as pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, and induration/swelling were reported. Injection site reactions were evaluated starting 30 minutes following the injection. Unsolicited injection site reactions were recorded for up to 28 days after administration of dose 2.

Countries

Colombia, Mexico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

For the phase 2 segment, participants were enrolled at 16 study sites in the United States. For the Phase 3 segment, participants were enrolled at 11 study sites in Colombia and Mexico. They were enrolled between 30 November 2020 to 13 September 2022

Pre-assignment details

In the Phase 2 segment, 618 participants were screened, of which 401 participants were enrolled to receive INO-4800 or placebo. In the Phase 3 segment, 978 participants were screened, of which 906 participants were enrolled to receive INO-4800 or placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1
Participants received one ID injection of 1.0 mg of INO-4800 followed by electroporation (EP) using the CELLECTRA® 2000 device on Day 0 and Day 28.
151
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2
Participants received 2 ID injections of 1.0 mg (total 2.0 mg per dosing visit) of INO-4800 followed by EP using the CELLECTRA® 2000 device on Day 0 and Day 28.
149
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1
Participants received one ID injection of placebo followed by EP using the CELLECTRA® 2000 device on Day 0 and Day 28.
50
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2
Participants received 2 ID injections of placebo followed by EP using the CELLECTRA® 2000 device on Day 0 and Day 28.
51
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)
Participants received two 1.0 mg ID injections of INO-4800, each followed by EP using the CELLECTRA® 2000 device on Day 0 and Day 28.
603
Phase 3: Placebo Dose Group
Participants received 2 ID injections of placebo per dosing visit, each followed by EP using the CELLECTRA® 2000 device on Day 0 and Day 28.
303
Total1,307

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event0010103
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up17185563
Overall StudyPhysician Decision000021
Overall StudyPregnancy000010
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation000013
Overall StudyReason Not Specified14003816
Overall StudyStudy Terminated0000484250
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2329976127

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupTotal
Age, Customized
Age
18-50 years
98 Participants97 Participants32 Participants34 Participants533 Participants267 Participants1061 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
51-64 years
41 Participants40 Participants14 Participants13 Participants63 Participants29 Participants200 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
>=65 years
12 Participants12 Participants4 Participants4 Participants7 Participants7 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants14 Participants7 Participants9 Participants601 Participants300 Participants960 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
122 Participants134 Participants43 Participants42 Participants1 Participants3 Participants345 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants314 Participants171 Participants491 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants8 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants16 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants267 Participants123 Participants394 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
127 Participants121 Participants45 Participants44 Participants20 Participants7 Participants364 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants77 Participants28 Participants30 Participants245 Participants120 Participants576 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
75 Participants72 Participants22 Participants21 Participants358 Participants183 Participants731 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1510 / 1471 / 500 / 512 / 6012 / 302
other
Total, other adverse events
115 / 151127 / 14742 / 5038 / 51279 / 601140 / 302
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1512 / 1473 / 502 / 514 / 6014 / 302

Outcome results

Primary

Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) Assay

Whole blood and serum samples were collected for the cellular immunology assessment. The antigen-specific cellular immune response to INO-4800 was measured in spot-forming units per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (SFU/10\^6, PBMC) using ELISpot. No samples collected after Week 6 were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 6

Population: PP population included all participants who received all doses of the trial intervention and had no key protocol violations. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants available at individual timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayBaseline0.00 SFU/10^6, PBMC
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayChange From Baseline at Week 66.70 SFU/10^6, PBMC
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayChange From Baseline at Week 613.30 SFU/10^6, PBMC
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayBaseline2.20 SFU/10^6, PBMC
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayBaseline0.00 SFU/10^6, PBMC
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayChange From Baseline at Week 60.00 SFU/10^6, PBMC
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayBaseline0.00 SFU/10^6, PBMC
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-linked Immunospot (ELISpot) AssayChange From Baseline at Week 60.00 SFU/10^6, PBMC
95% CI: [-10, 0]
95% CI: [0, 6.7]
95% CI: [3.3, 17.8]
Primary

Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization Assay

The immune responses to INO-4800 were measured using assays that included a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay. Immunology blood samples were collected at serial timepoints. No samples collected after Week 6 were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 6

Population: PP population included all participants who received all doses of the trial intervention and had no key protocol violations. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants available at individual timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayBaseline34.8 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.42
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayChange From Baseline at Week 63.1 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.49
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayChange From Baseline at Week 64.6 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.52
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayBaseline40.6 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.52
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayBaseline30.2 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.4
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayChange From Baseline at Week 61.2 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.39
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayBaseline38.0 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.45
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization AssayChange From Baseline at Week 61.2 inhibition dilution 50 (ID50)Standard Deviation 0.49
95% CI: [1.72, 3.632]
95% CI: [2.638, 5.7]
95% CI: [0.512, 0.893]
Primary

Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Virologically-confirmed COVID-19 Disease

Participants were virologically-confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. Participants with no prior exposure to COVID-19 at baseline were considered for the analysis.

Time frame: From 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)

Population: For the Phase 3 segment, as pre-specified in the protocol, an independent endpoint adjudication committee (EAC) was to review and confirm the suspected COVID-19 cases which fulfilled the definition for virologically-confirmed COVID-19 cases. As the trial was prematurely terminated, suspected COVID-19 cases were not reconciled with the EAC. Therefore, data that was planned for the EAC to reconcile was not available for efficacy analysis and data could not be reported for the outcome measure.

Secondary

Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AESI (serious or non-serious) is one of scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the sponsor can be appropriate.

Time frame: Phase 2: From first dose of study drug up to Day 393; Phase 3: From first dose of study drug up to Day 126

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the trial intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)2.0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)0.3 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly or birth defect.

Time frame: Phase 2: From first dose of study drug up to Day 393; Phase 3: From first dose of study drug up to Day 126

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the trial intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)2.6 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1.4 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)6.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)3.9 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0.7 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Participants were provided a diary to record the solicited systemic AEs. The solicited AEs were recorded for 7 days after each dose.

Time frame: 7 days following each dose: Day 0 (Days 0 to Day 7) and Day 28 (Days 28 to Day 35)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the trial intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)72.2 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)83.7 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)70.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)56.9 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)31.6 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs)31.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site Reactions

Reactions arising from the injectable product administration procedure were reported as injection site reactions. Injection site reactions were assessed in accordance with the 'Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials' (Food and Drug Administration \[FDA\] Guidance for Industry, September 2007). Participants were provided a diary to record the solicited injection site reactions. Local reactions to the injectable product such as pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, and induration/swelling were recorded. Injection site reactions were evaluated starting 30 minutes following the injection. The solicited injection site reactions were recorded for 7 days after each dose.

Time frame: 7 days following each dose: Day 0 (Days 0 to Day 7) and Day 28 (Days 28 to Day 35)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the trial intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain27.2 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness1.9 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema17.9 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling11.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema25.2 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness5.4 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain36.1 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling16.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling2.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema18.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness2.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain20.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain23.5 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling2.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness3.9 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema7.8 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema6.8 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling4.2 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain19.1 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema6.0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling2.6 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain21.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a trial intervention that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Unsolicited AEs were recorded for up to 28 days after administration of dose 2.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Day 56

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the trial intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs74.2 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs85.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs74.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs62.7 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs38.8 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs37.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site Reactions

Reactions arising from the injectable product administration procedure were reported as injection site reactions. Injection site reactions were assessed in accordance with the 'Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials' FDA Guidance for Industry, September 2007. Local reactions to the injectable product such as pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, and induration/swelling were reported. Injection site reactions were evaluated starting 30 minutes following the injection. Unsolicited injection site reactions were recorded for up to 28 days after administration of dose 2.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Day 56

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the trial intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain27.2 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness0.6 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema17.9 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling11.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema25.2 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain36.7 percentage of participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling16.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling2.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema18.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 1Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain22.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain23.5 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling2.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness1.9 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Placebo Dose Group 2Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema7.8 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema6.8 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling4.2 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: INO-4800 Dose Group (2.0mg Per Dosing Visit)Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain19.3 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Tenderness0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Erythema6.0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Swelling2.6 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Placebo Dose GroupPhase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Injection Site ReactionsInjection Site Pain21.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 3: Change From Baseline in Antigen-specific Cellular Immune Response Measured by IFN-gamma ELISpot Assay

Whole blood and serum samples were collected for the cellular immunology assessment. The antigen-specific cellular immune response to INO-4800 were measured using ELISpot.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 126

Population: Due to the early termination of the study, immunogenicity analysis that was pre-specified in the protocol was not performed in the Phase 3 segment of the study. Hence, data for this outcome measure was not collected.

Secondary

Phase 3: Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody Response Measured by a Pseudovirus-based Neutralization Assay

The immune responses to INO-4800 were measured using assays that included a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 126

Population: Due to the early termination of the study, immunogenicity analysis that was pre-specified in the protocol was not performed in the Phase 3 segment of the study. Hence, data for this outcome measure was not collected.

Secondary

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Death From All Causes

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 126

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the trial intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 1Phase 3: Number of Participants With Death From All Causes2 Participants
Phase 2: INO-4800 Dose Group 2Phase 3: Number of Participants With Death From All Causes2 Participants
Secondary

Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Death From COVID-19 Disease

Time frame: From 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)

Population: For the Phase 3 segment, as pre-specified in the protocol, an independent EAC was to review and confirm the suspected COVID-19 cases which fulfilled the definition for virologically-confirmed COVID-19 cases. As the trial was prematurely terminated, suspected COVID-19 cases were not reconciled with the EAC. Therefore, data that was planned for the EAC to reconcile was not available for efficacy analysis and data could not be reported for the outcome measure.

Secondary

Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Non-Severe COVID-19 Disease

The efficacy of INO-4800 in the prevention of COVID-19 disease was evaluated according to the degrees of COVID-19 disease severity in participants. Participants were confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. The case definition of severe COVID-19 was participants with COVID-19 having clinical signs at rest indicative of severe systemic illness, respiratory failure, evidence of shock, significant acute renal, hepatic, or neurologic dysfunction, admission to an intensive care unit, or death. The case definition for non-severe COVID-19 was participants with confirmed COVID-19, and which did not meet the case definition of severe COVID-19.

Time frame: From 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)

Population: For the Phase 3 segment, as pre-specified in the protocol, an independent EAC was to review and confirm the suspected COVID-19 cases which fulfilled the definition for virologically-confirmed COVID-19 cases. As the trial was prematurely terminated, suspected COVID-19 cases were not reconciled with the EAC. Therefore, data that was planned for the EAC to reconcile was not available for efficacy analysis and data could not be reported for the outcome measure.

Secondary

Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative at Baseline) With Severe COVID-19 Disease

The efficacy of INO-4800 in the prevention of COVID-19 disease was evaluated according to the degrees of COVID-19 disease severity in participants. Participants were confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. The case definition of severe COVID-19 was participants with COVID-19 having clinical signs at rest indicative of severe systemic illness, respiratory failure, evidence of shock, significant acute renal, hepatic, or neurologic dysfunction, admission to an intensive care unit, or death.

Time frame: From 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)

Population: For the Phase 3 segment, as pre-specified in the protocol, an independent EAC was to review and confirm the suspected COVID-19 cases which fulfilled the definition for virologically-confirmed COVID-19 cases. As the trial was prematurely terminated, suspected COVID-19 cases were not reconciled with the EAC. Therefore, data that was planned for the EAC to reconcile was not available for efficacy analysis and data could not be reported for the outcome measure.

Secondary

Phase 3: Percentage of Participants (SARS-CoV-2 Seropositive at Baseline) With Virologically-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Disease

Participants were virologically-confirmed cases of COVID-19, if tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with symptoms like fever (temperature of 100.4ºF/38.0ºC or higher), chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. Participants with prior exposure to COVID-19 at baseline were considered for the analysis.

Time frame: From 14 days after completion of the 2-dose regimen up to 3 months post-dose 2 (i.e. Day 42 up to Day 126)

Population: For the Phase 3 segment, as pre-specified in the protocol, an independent EAC was to review and confirm the suspected COVID-19 cases which fulfilled the definition for virologically-confirmed COVID-19 cases. As the trial was prematurely terminated, suspected COVID-19 cases were not reconciled with the EAC. Therefore, data that was planned for the EAC to reconcile was not available for efficacy analysis and data could not be reported for the outcome measure.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026