Skip to content

Effectiveness of Occupation-Based Intervention Compared With Therapeutic Exercise for Older Adults With Shoulder OA.

Effectiveness of an Occupation-Based Intervention Compared With Therapeutic Exercise for Older Adults With Shoulder Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04641546
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-11-24
Start date
2019-10-28
Completion date
2020-01-10
Last updated
2020-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis Shoulder

Brief summary

As a registered and licensed occupational therapist, I completed a six-week evidence based research study to determine the effects of occupation-based intervention and therapeutic exercises versus therapeutic exercises alone.

Detailed description

Importance: There is a need for evidence to support occupation-based intervention (OBI) for older adults with shoulder osteoarthritis (OA). Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of OBI on function in older adults with shoulder OA compared to therapeutic exercise (TE). Design: Randomized controlled trial. Six-week intervention. 1-week and 4-week follow-up. Setting: Outpatient clinic. Participants: Ten older adults with diagnosis of shoulder OA via convenience sampling. Intervention: Participants were seen two times/week for six weeks. The OBI group completed 30 minutes of TE followed by 30 minutes of OBI. The TE group completed 60 minutes of TE. Outcome and Measures: Functional outcomes were assessed at pre-, 1-week post, and 4-weeks posttreatment using the QuickDASH as the primary outcome measure.

Interventions

PROCEDURETherapeutic Exercise

Passive range of motion (PROM), active-assistive range of motion (AAROM), active range of motion (AROM), and strengthening activities.

PROCEDUREOccupation-Based Intervention

Collecting and placing items in cabinets, washing windows and tables, and hanging clothes on a clothesline.

Sponsors

Bay Path University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of shoulder osteoarthritis (confirmed by physician examination or radiographic imaging) * Aged 65 years or older

Exclusion criteria

* Previous shoulder injuries * Acute pathology * Previous shoulder surgery * Current use of pain medication * Inflammatory arthritis * Upper extremity neuropathy or myopathy * Current participation in a home exercise program * Score of \<18 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Baseline scoresPre-InterventionTo assess the impact of the intervention on physical function and symptoms of shoulder osteoarthritis. * Minimum Value: 0 (no disability) * Maximum Value: 100 (most severe disability) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (greater upper extremity dysfunction)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 1-week Post-Intervention Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores1-week Post-InterventionTo assess the impact of the intervention on physical function and symptoms of shoulder osteoarthritis. * Minimum Value: 0 (no disability) * Maximum Value: 100 (most severe disability) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (greater upper extremity dysfunction)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo assess the impact of the intervention on physical function and symptoms of shoulder osteoarthritis. * Minimum Value: 0 (no disability) * Maximum Value: 100 (most severe disability) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (greater upper extremity dysfunction)
Change between 1-week and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo assess the impact of the intervention on physical function and symptoms of shoulder osteoarthritis. * Minimum Value: 0 (no disability) * Maximum Value: 100 (most severe disability) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (greater upper extremity dysfunction)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) Baseline ScoresPre-InterventionObserving and grading ROM on a 3-point Likert scale to determine shoulder mobility and pain with movement. * Minimum Value: 0 (unable/no pain) * Maximum Value: 3 (full able/lots of pain) * Higher scores = Better outcome (fully ROM/no pain with ROM)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 1-week Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) scores1-week Post-InterventionObserving and grading ROM on a 3-point Likert scale to determine shoulder mobility and pain with movement. * Minimum Value: 0 (unable/no pain) * Maximum Value: 3 (fully able/lots of pain) * Higher scores = Better outcome (full ROM/no pain with ROM)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) scores4-weeks Post-InterventionObserving and grading ROM on a 3-point Likert scale to determine shoulder mobility and pain with movement. * Minimum Value: 0 (unable/no pain) * Maximum Value: 3 (fully able/lots of pain) * Higher scores = Better outcome (full ROM/no pain with ROM)
Change between 1-week and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) scores4-weeks Post-InterventionObserving and grading ROM on a 3-point Likert scale to determine shoulder mobility and pain with movement. * Minimum Value: 0 (unable/no pain) * Maximum Value: 3 (fully able/lots of pain) * Higher scores = Better outcome (full ROM/no pain with ROM)
Jamar Hand Dynamometer Baseline ScoresPre-InterventionTo measure grip strength. * Minimum Value: 0 pounds * Maximum Value: 200 pounds * Higher scores = Better outcome (increased grip strength)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 1-week Jamar Hand Dynamometer scores1-week Post-InterventionTo measure grip strength. * Minimum Value: 0 pounds * Maximum Value: 200 pounds * Higher scores = Better outcome (increased grip strength)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Baseline ScoresPre-InterventionTo determine the effect of the intervention on participants' self-perception of occupational performance and satisfaction over time. * Minimum Value: 0 * Maximum Value: 10 * Higher scores = Better outcome (greater client-perceived changes in satisfaction and performance of daily occupations)
Change between 1-week and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Jamar Hand Dynamometer Scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo measure grip strength. * Minimum Value: 0 pounds * Maximum Value: 200 pounds * Higher scores = Better outcome (increased grip strength)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Baseline ScoresPre-InterventionTo measure pain. * Minimum Value: 0 (no pain) * Maximum Value: 10 (worst possible pain) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (increased pain)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 1-week Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores1-week Post-InterventionTo measure pain. * Minimum Value: 0 (no pain) * Maximum Value: 10 (worst possible pain) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (increased pain)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo measure pain. * Minimum Value: 0 (no pain) * Maximum Value: 10 (worst possible pain) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (increased pain)
Change between 1-week and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo measure pain. * Minimum Value: 0 (no pain) * Maximum Value: 10 (worst possible pain) * Higher scores = Worse outcome (increased pain)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Jamar Hand Dynamometer scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo measure grip strength. * Minimum Value: 0 pounds * Maximum Value: 200 pounds * Higher scores = Better outcome (increased grip strength)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 1-week Post-Intervention Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) scores1-week Post-InterventionTo determine the effect of the intervention on participants' self-perception of occupational performance and satisfaction over time. * Minimum Value: 0 * Maximum Value: 10 * Higher scores = Better outcome (greater client-perceived changes in satisfaction and performance of daily occupations)
Change between Pre-Intervention and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo determine the effect of the intervention on participants' self-perception of occupational performance and satisfaction over time. * Minimum Value: 0 * Maximum Value: 10 * Higher scores = Better outcome (greater client-perceived changes in satisfaction and performance of daily occupations)
Change between 1-week and 4-weeks Post-Intervention Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) scores4-weeks Post-InterventionTo determine the effect of the intervention on participants' self-perception of occupational performance and satisfaction over time. * Minimum Value: 0 * Maximum Value: 10 * Higher scores = Better outcome (greater client-perceived changes in satisfaction and performance of daily occupations)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026