Skip to content

Isokinetic Performance and Function After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Isokinetic Performance and Function Are Similar 12 Months After Total Hip Arthroplasty Applied With a Posterior or Anterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04640740
Enrollment
48
Registered
2020-11-23
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2018-12-30
Last updated
2020-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Osteoarthritis

Keywords

anterolateral approach, posterior approach, isokinetic test

Brief summary

There are ongoing debates on the effects of the surgical approach on outcome after total hip arthroplasty. It was hypothesized that with the anterolateral approach, trauma to the abductor arm can be occured and related detrimental effects can diminish the post-operative outcomes. In this first randomized controlled trial in the literature on this subject, isokinetic performance and patient-reported functional outcomes were evaluated in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. with a posterior approach (PA) and a anterolateral approach (ALA), at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Detailed description

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty are randomized to posterior approach (PA) and anterolateral approach (ALA) groups. The patients are evaluated preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, with flexion, extension and abduction strength measurements and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The physiatrist performing isokinetic tests and the patients are blinded to the study groups.All data are calculated as mean and standard deviation values. The Student's t-test is used for statistical analysis of the patient data. Statistical calculations are performed using SPSS vn.22.0 software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY, USA).

Interventions

PROCEDUREhip arthroplasty

two different approaches of total hip arthroplasty

Sponsors

Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 55 to 80 years unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis -

Exclusion criteria

bilateral osteoarthritis inflammatory arthritis post-traumatic osteoarthritis previous hip surgery neuromuscular diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
isokinetic testChange from preoperative isokinetic test results at 6th months and 12th months isokinetic test resultsisokinetic test during flexion, extension and abduction of the hip

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Harris Hip ScoreChange from preoperativeHarris Hip Score results at 6th months and 12th months iHarris Hip Score resultsFunctional score of the hip. Harris Hip Score: 100-90: Excellent 89-80:Good 79-70:Fair below 70:Poor

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026