Skip to content

Effect of Anterioposterior Weight Shifting Training With Visual Biofeedback in Subacute Stroke

Effect of Anterioposterior Weight Shifting Training With Visual Biofeedback in Subacute Stroke

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04637737
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-11-20
Start date
2014-10-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2020-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Asymmetric gait patterns of stroke is one of the most important functional activities to enable community participation, it is major goal for stroke patients. Reported that the stroke patients had asymmetry at stance time, single stance, double support time, and swing time compared to normal people, and claimed that the most important factor was step length. According to Albert et al., patients with an asymmetric gait pattern have a long double support phase and a healthy side single support phase, and less weight shift to the affected side. Recent studies have shown that visual feedback for weight shift may be helpful to obtain a symmetrical posture after stroke. However, no study has been conducted on the therapeutic effect on gait asymmetry and patterns. We aimed to investigate the effect of Anterioposterior Weight Shifting Training with Visual Biofeedback in subacute post-stroke patients on gait asymmetry and pattern. 40 subacute post-stroke patients with Step Length Asymmetry were enrolled in this study. The subjects were randomly assigned into two groups. The training group received an additional anterioposterior weight shifting training with visual Biofeedback 5 times per week for 4weeks. The control group received the usual gait training. The spatiotemporal and kinematic data were obtained during walking through 3D motion analysis. Functional Ambulation Category, Self-selected walking speed, Maximum safe walking speed, Berg balance Test (BBT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Medical Research Council Score (MRC), Functional Independent Measure-mobility, Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were assessed at pre, during, post- training, and 4week follow-up. Those were compared between two groups by repeated measures ANOVA.

Interventions

DEVICEanterioposterior Weight Shifting Training with Visual Biofeedback

The training group received an additional anterioposterior weight shifting training with visual Biofeedback 5 times per week for 4weeks. AP training is made to instantly know your training status during training by measuring and processing the foot pressure in real time using the F-Scan (Tekscan) hardware system and Software Development Kit (SDK). Before training, all patients are instructed to place both feet at shoulder width, place the inverted foot approximately 30 cm in front of the unaffected side foot, move the body forward with the chest straight in an upright position, and be instructed to put the weight on the affected side. On the screen shown, measure the maximum weight distribution during the first 10 times and set the value added by 5% as the target value. It is designed to induce the maximum weight shift through the archery game.

BEHAVIORALConventional therapy

The control group received the usual gait training.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. less than 6 months after onset of the stroke 2. can stand and walk independently 10m 3. K-MMSE score of at least 15 4. have asymmetrical gait pattern with Step length asymmetric ratio greater than 1.1 5. over 20 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

1. quadriplegia 2. past history of stroke 3. past history of Musculoskeletal disease or history of Neurological diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Step Length Asymmetric Ratiobefore training(0week)Step Length Asymmetric Ratio = paretic step length/non paretic step length
Step Length Asymmetric Indexbefore training(0week)Step Length Asymmetric Index = paretic step length-non paretic step length/0.5\[paretic step length +non paretic step length\]

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactDeog Young Kim
KIMDY@yuhs.ac+82-2-2228-3714

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026