Skip to content

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Postoperative Crohn's Disease

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Postoperative Crohn's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04637438
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-11-19
Start date
2021-05-18
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2022-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease

Keywords

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Brief summary

This pilot study aims to detect possible trends or signals suggesting efficacy of FMT on prevention of delay of POR, to determine the safety of FMT in post operative CD, and asses if a full randomised controlled trial is feasible in this setting. With microbiota analysis we aim to assess if changes in gut microbiota are related to disease course of CD after operation.

Interventions

OTHERFecal Microbiota Transplantation

FMT via colonoscopy

OTHERPlacebo

Water infusion via colonoscopy

Sponsors

Turku University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Joint Authority for Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care
CollaboratorOTHER
Kuopio University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Helsinki University Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Over 18 years * Able to provide written consent * Stricturing and/or fistulizing Crohn's disease needing ileocecal or ileal resection

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Active infection, abscess or fistula at the time of the first colonoscopy * Life expectancy \<1 year * Unable to provide written consent * Use on antibiotics or probiotics at the time of first colonoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in endoscopic Rutgeerts score between first and second colonoscopy1 yearRutgeerts endoscopic score ranges from i0 indicating remission to i4 indicating severe post-operative relapse. Cut off value \> i1 will be used to compare number on patients in intervention group and in placebo group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical activity of Crohn's disease using Harwey-Bradshaw Index6 months, 12 months, 5 yearsScores of less that 5 indicate that the patient's Crohn's disease is in remission while scores higher than 16 indicate severe disease activity. Median scores will be compared between intervention group and placebo group.
Histologic activity of Crohn's Disease using modified Global Histological Activity Score1 years, 5 yearsThe GHAS consists of eight items assessing acute and chronic inflammatory changes, epithelial damage and the extent of inflammation (i.e. the proportion of biopsy specimens affected). Each of the eight items is scored, with the totals subsequently added together. Maximum number 14 indicates histological activity. The median GHAS score will be compared between intervention group and placebo group.
Change of microbiota in stool samples and in intestinal biopsies6 weeks,12 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 yearsThe relative abundances of taxonomic units in cases versus controls and different time points will be compared at the level of phylum, class, genus, species and OTU. Alpha diversity measures will be determined from the original unfiltered dataset by counting observed taxa (OTU richness) and by Chao1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson and Fisher indices; diversity will be compared between time points.cases and controls. Beta diversity will be assessed by examining the results of principle component analysis using multiple distance methods, if appreciable difference between cases and controls or time points will be noted, formal testing of clustering will be performed. To simplify complex bacteriome profiles, we will also sort each sample into enterotypes based on the leading components of their bacteriomes; the enterotypes will be tested as a predictor of the case-control or disease status of cases.
Patient reported outcome12 weeks, 48 weeks,years 5IBD symptom index (IBD-SI) questionnaire. Minimum number of points 0 indicating remission, maximum number of points 15 indicating active disease or flare.
Safety of FMT using FinFMT-Questionnaire3 months, 12 months, 5 yearsUnvalidated survey including 20 questions.
Need for hospitalizationThrough study completion, an avarage of 1 year and 5 yearsAvarage number of days spent in hospital in intervention group vs. plasebo group
Need for treatment escalationThrough study completion, an avarage of 1 year and 5 yearsNumber of patients needing treatment escalation from thiopurines to TNF alfa blockers in intervention group versus plasebo group
F-calpro microg/g6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 yearsMedian in intervention group versus plasebo group
Hb mg/l6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 yearsMedian in intervention group versus plasebo group
Change in inflammatory marker CRP mg/l6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 yearsMedian in intervention group versus plasebo group

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactElina Jokinen, PhD
elina.jokinen@pshp.fi+3583311611

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026