Skip to content

Psychotherapy Strategies for the Treatment of Professionals and Students From Essential Services With High Levels of Emotional Distress in the Context of COVID-19

A Pragmatic Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Brief Cognitive Behavioral Telepsychotherapy, Brief Interpersonal Telepsychotherapy and Telepsychoeducation for the Reduction of Emotional Distress During COVID-19 Outbreak in Professionals and Students From Essential Services With a High Level of Emotional Distress in Brazil in the Context of COVID-19

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04635618
Enrollment
999
Registered
2020-11-19
Start date
2020-11-05
Completion date
2021-07-20
Last updated
2020-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, COVID, Depression, Emotional Distress, Irritable Mood, Mental Disorder

Brief summary

The study consists in a pragmatic superiority randomized controlled trial comparing different strategies of psychotherapy for professionals and students from essential services with high levels of emotional distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Therapeutic strategies to be evaluated are Brief Cognitive Behavioral Telepsychotherapy, Brief Interpersonal Telepsychotherapy and Telepsychoeducation, as an active control. Note: This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre and is originally registered at Plataforma Brasil, a Brazilian study registration platform (under CAAE: 30608420.5.0000.5327). Recruitment began in May 28th 2020.

Detailed description

PRAGMATIC TREATMENT TRIAL TITLE: A pragmatic superiority randomized controlled trial comparing Brief Cognitive Behavioral Telepsychotherapy, Brief Interpersonal Telepsychotherapy and Telepsychoeducation for the reduction of emotional distress during COVID-19 outbreak in professionals and students from essential services with a high level of emotional distress in Brazil. IMPORTANCE: COVID-19 outbreak is associated with increased emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and irritability) all over the world. Currently, there are no large randomized trials testing interventions to reduce the burden caused by mental disorders during a pandemic outbreak of these proportions. OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of two modalities of Brief-Telepsychotherapy (Cognitive Behavioral and Interpersonal) to the reduction of symptoms of emotional distress (anxiety, depression, and irritability) in professionals and students from essential services with a high level of those symptoms in Brazil during the COVID-19 outbreak. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Thee-arm randomized clinical trial. Participants were recruited in Brazil from the national service of telehealth provided by the ministry of health. Participants included professional and students from essential services suffering from high levels of anxiety, depression, and irritability symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak. High levels of symptoms were defined by either of the following: (1) T score higher than 70 on the PROMIS Anxiety Scale; (2) T score higher than 70 on the PROMIS Depression Scale; (3) T score higher than 70 on the PROMIS Anger Scale. INTERVENTIONS: All participants will be randomized 1:1:1: to the Cognitive Behavioral Brief-Telepsychotherapy group (B-CBT, four sessions), Brief Interpersonal Telepsychotherapy (B-IPT, four sessions) or Telepsychoeducation group (a single session psychoeducation group plus weekly personalized pre-recorded videos for 4 weeks). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome will be the proportion of participants with a 50% reduction in T-scores in all the scales that were scored above 70 at baseline at 1-month. Secondary outcomes (1) the same measure of the primary outcome but measured at 3-month and 6-months follow-up; (2) mean score change in individual scales, quality of life and remission levels (proportion of patients with T-score of 50 or below in all of the four emotional distress subscales); (3) the same measure of the primary outcome but measured at midpoint (after the second session or 2-weeks); and (4) service satisfaction and net-promoter score at the end of the treatment. EXPECTED RESULTS: To detect a 15% group difference between each group, an alpha of 0.017 (3 comparisons, 0,05/3), power of 90%, and 20% loss to follow up, we would need a total of 333 participants per group.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Brief-Telepsychotherapy

Four sections of Cognitive Behavioral Brief-Telepsychotherapy plus personalized pre-recorded videos

BEHAVIORALBrief Interpersonal Telepsychotherapy

Four sections of Brief Interpersonal Telepsychotherapy plus personalized pre-recorded videos

BEHAVIORALTelepsychoeducation

A single session psychoeducation group plus weekly personalized pre-recorded videos for 4 weeks

Sponsors

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Three-arm randomized clinical trial , including professionals and students from essential services suffering from high levels of anxiety, depression, and irritability symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak randomized 1:1:1: to the Cognitive Behavioral Brief-Telepsychotherapy group (B-CBT, four sessions), Brief Interpersonal Telepsychotherapy (B-IPT, four sessions) or Telepsychoeducation group (a single session psychoeducation group plus weekly personalized pre-recorded videos for 4 weeks).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Professionals and students from essential services suffering from high levels of emotional distress * T score higher than 70 on the PROMIS Anxiety Scale * T score higher than 70 on the PROMIS Depression Scale * T score higher than 70 on the PROMIS Anger Scale

Exclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe suicide risk assessed by a psychiatrist

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Reduction at 1-month1-monthProportion of participants with a 50% reduction in T-scores at 1-month in the scales Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) of Depression, Anxiety and Anger that were scored above 70 at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Reduction at 3 and 6-months follow-up3 and 6-monthProportion of participants with a 50% reduction in T-scores at 3 and 6-months follow-up in the scales Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) of Depression, Anxiety and Anger that were scored above 70 at baseline measured
Remission Levels in distress scales1, 3 and 6-monthsRemission levels (proportion of patients with T-score of 50 or below) in distress scales (PROMIS of Depression, Anxiety and Anger)
Service Satisfaction1-monthService satisfaction measured by the net-promoter score at the end of the treatment (proportion of promoters - scores of 9 or 10)
Improvement in Quality of Life1, 3 and 6-monthsMean score change in quality of life scale (PROMIS General Life Satisfaction Scale or GLSS)

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026