Skip to content

Unravelling the Etiology of Shoulder Osteoarthritis

Unravelling the Etiology of Shoulder Osteoarthritis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04634773
Acronym
UESOA
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-11-18
Start date
2021-06-23
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder

Keywords

T1Rho MRI, qCT, Motion Analysis

Brief summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive disease resulting from the degradation of synovial joint articular cartilage over time. The hallmark symptom is diffuse aching and progressive pain made worse with activity. Loss of range of motion and compromised function inevitably follow. This degenerative disease can affect the shoulder joint. When symptoms become refractory to conservative treatment such as anti-inflammatory medication, steroid injections, activity modification or physical therapy; surgery (total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty) may be considered. Idiopathic shoulder OA is typically characterized by posterior subluxation of the humeral head upon the glenoid and posterior bone loss. An imbalance in the application of forces applied to the proximal humerus by the posterior and anterior rotator cuff muscles has been postulated to be the leading cause of idiopathic shoulder OA. However, there is only preliminary evidence to support this theory and the etiology of this pattern of deformity is unknown. The theory the posterior humeral head subluxation is a precursor to OA is only supported by very low-level evidence and no longitudinal studies have been conducted. As a result, the cause and natural history of shoulder OA remains unknown. Research into this area is urgently needed to generate knowledge that will inform future treatments aimed at modifying and slowing the progression of shoulder OA and to reduce the need for shoulder replacement therapy. The aim of this project is to develop an understanding of the pathophysiology of shoulder OA.

Detailed description

Purpose: The aim of this project is to develop an understanding of the pathophysiology of shoulder OA. This project will recruit two groups of 30 participants, (60 participants in total) and follow them over a period of 5-years. Group 1- Participants with posterior subluxation of the humeral head and show early signs of degeneration in their shoulder 'disease group' Group 2- Participants with posterior subluxation of the humeral head and show no signs of degeneration 'control/healthy' group Hypotheses: The investigators hypothesize that there are several factors that contribute to the development of shoulder OA. Uncovering those pathways will lead to more targeted therapy. (1) The posterior rotator cuff muscles (infraspinatus/teres minor) apply relatively greater force than the anterior (subscapularis) cuff; an imbalance in the force couple occurs and the humeral head translates posteriorly on the glenoid; progressive posterior subluxation of the humeral head occurs and degeneration of the glenoid and humeral head cartilage follow. (2) Posterior subluxation of the humeral head is associated with progressive cartilage proteoglycan loss. (3) Pre-morbid glenoid morphology including increased retroversion is associated with the development of shoulder OA. Participant Involvement: The following will be completed with participants: T1Rho Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), quantitative Computed Tomography (qCT), functional and motion analysis at baseline, year 2 and year 4 in the 'affected' shoulder in both groups 1 and 2. These tests will also be conducted on the asymptomatic, contralateral shoulder in Group 1 participants at baseline and year 4. The finite element model validation will be performed in years 2 and 3, and participant-specific finite element analysis (which has no active participant involvement) will occur in years 3 to 5. Overall study analysis will occur in year 5. This project will be done in two-parts. The first part will consist of six participants; assuming further funding is obtained, part two of the study will proceed. The second part of the project will be based on successfully obtaining funds to continue the remainder of the study recruitment (54 participants) and testing. As pilot data is urgently needed to secure granting funds to support this overall project, the investigators will commence with recruiting the first 6 participants. Once further funds are secured, the remaining portion (recruitment of 54 participants) of the project will continue. Objectives: (1) Determine whether patients with posterior humeral head subluxation have an imbalance between the posterior and anterior rotator cuff muscles. Objective 1 will be assessed through T1Rho MRI, and functional testing/motion analysis. (2) Determine whether patients with static posterior subluxation of the humeral head are at risk of degenerative changes (i.e. proteoglycan loss). Objective 2 will be assessed through T1Rho MRI and qCT scans. (3) Determine which joint factors are associated with progression of OA. This will be assessed using qCT scans and finite element model analysis. Clinical Relevance: The cause is shoulder OA is unknown, and the burden and costs associated with this degenerative disease are increasing with our aging population. Research in this area is urgently needed to generate knowledge which will inform future treatments which may modify and slow the progression of shoulder OA, and to reduce the need for shoulder replacement therapy.

Interventions

RADIATIONLow-dose CT

A low-dose, or quantitative (q) CT scan will be performed on the shoulder. This CT scan will be done to assess the bony structure of the shoulder, as well as bone strength, which can influence the health of the cartilage. Group 1 participants will complete this scan at baseline, 2-years and 4-years in the affected shoulder, and at baseline and 4-years in the opposite, unaffected shoulder. Group 2 participants will complete this scan at baseline, 2-years and 4-years.

OTHERT1Rho MRI

A T1Rho MRI will be performed on the shoulder. This imaging technique uses a special sequence and will be used to assess the muscles and tendons around the shoulder. Group 1 participants will complete this scan at baseline, 2-years and 4-years in the affected shoulder, and at baseline and 4-years in the opposite, unaffected shoulder. Group 2 participants will complete this scan at baseline, 2-years and 4-years.

Motion analysis is the study of how joints move and which muscles fire during specific movements. In the lab, participants will be asked to perform movements that they might do during a typical day or when exercising. Group 1 participants will complete this scan at baseline, 2-years and 4-years in the affected shoulder, and at baseline and 4-years in the opposite, unaffected shoulder. Group 2 participants will complete this scan at baseline, 2-years and 4-years.

Sponsors

University of Ottawa
CollaboratorOTHER
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults \<60 years of age * Posterior humeral head subluxation \>55% (determined from imaging)

Exclusion criteria

* \>60 years of age * History of shoulder instability * History of shoulder trauma including fracture * Neurological disorders of the upper limb * Imaging evidence of humeral head or glenoid bony deformity * Rotator cuff pathology * Labral pathology * Pre-existing joint deformity (OA) cases greater than grade I (as per Samilson and Prieto)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
T1Rho MRI5-Years Post-AllocationMRI will be used to measure the muscle-fat ratio, and tendon thickness. Increased fat-infiltration, and tendon thinning indicates a worse outcome.
qCT (Low Dose CT)5-Years Post-AllocationUsed to measure bone loss and density. Increased bone loss, and decreased density indicate a worse outcome.
Motion Analysis5-Years Post-AllocationA kinematic evaluation of the shoulder while performing functional tasks will help us determine how the rotator cuff muscle imbalance influences the shoulder joint kinematics.
Finite Element Analysis5-Years Post-AllocationThis will be combined with motion analysis results to gain a better understanding of the internal loading within the tissues of the joint that could explain degenerative changes observed by imaging. Increased stresses, and muscle imbalance result in a worse outcome.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026