Skip to content

Impact of Social Distancing on Bariatric Versus Non-Surgical Obese Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic

Comparing the Impact of Social Distancing and Lockdown on Bariatric Patients Versus Non-Surgical Obese Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic - Cross Sectional Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04633941
Enrollment
272
Registered
2020-11-18
Start date
2020-06-01
Completion date
2020-07-30
Last updated
2020-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Obesity, Morbid

Brief summary

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, weight management programs and metabolic surgery have been deferred to contain the virus. Quarantine and social distancing negatively impact dietary, exercise and psychological health of obese individuals. The study aims to evaluate the impact of social distancing measures on post-metabolic surgery patients compare to non-surgical obese patients and discuss potential strategies for management post COVID-19.

Detailed description

In Singapore, a nationwide partial lockdown, termed the circuit breaker was imposed from 7th April until 1st June 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (Appendix A). Our study aims to evaluate the impact of social distancing and lockdowns during this circuit breaker period on our patients with obesity, either post-metabolic surgery (MS) or undergoing active medical management (MM), during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Results will help inform and address the challenges in patient care that this pandemic has brought to light, its long-term implications on the management of the bariatric patient and discuss potential strategies for the management of a bariatric patient in a post COVID-19 society. To the knowledge of this paper, this is the first study to compare the impact of COVID on MS and MM patients which will allow understanding of unique stressors faced by MS patients This study adopted a cross-sectional survey design to evaluate the impact of lockdown social distancing measures on obese patients in Singapore. The study conducted either face-to-face questionnaires in the clinic after lockdown for those who were not suitable for video consultation or questionnaires administered via telecommunication channels such as WhatsApp

Interventions

OTHERStandard Care

Standard Care

Sponsors

Singapore General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Obesity (BMI 30 kg/m2 and above) * English literate * Mental capacity to make their own decisions

Exclusion criteria

* Undergone bariatric surgery ≤ 6 months ago * Have active eating disorders * Pregnant or had given birth ≤ 6 months ago * Admitted to hospital or tested positive for COVID-19 * Exhibit symptoms of active severe psychological and psychiatric conditions like psychosis, self-harm, suicide, hallucinations that may hinder them from providing accurate responses.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WeightJune2020-July20201 question asked about participants weight in kg before the lockdown; 1 question asked participants about weight in kg during lockdown

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood Sugar ControlJune2020-July 2020Participants were asked 1 question on how well blood sugar was controlled before the lock down. An ordinal scale was used: Very Poor, Poor, Reasonable, Good, Very Good. Participants were asked 1 question on how well blood sugar was controlled during the lock down. An ordinal scale was used: Very Poor, Poor, Reasonable, Good, Very Good.
Medical AdherenceJune 2020-July2020Participants were asked how often medication was missed before the lockdown with1 question using an ordinal scale: Never, Once in a while, Sometime, Usually, All the Time. Participants were asked how often medication was missed during the lockdown with1 question using an ordinal scale: Never, Once in a while, Sometime, Usually, All the Time.
Stress levelJune 2020-July2020Participants were asked on the level of stress before the lockdown using a Likert scale of 1-10; with 1=not stressful at all; 10= extremely stressful. Participants were asked level of stress were during the lockdown using a Likert scale of 1-10; with 1=not stressful at all; 10= extremely stressful.
Physical Activity LevelJune2020-July 2020Participants were asked frequency of exercise before the lockdown on a ordinal scale ranging from less than 1 time a week; Once a week; 2-3 times a week;4-5 times a week; More than 5 times a week. Participants were asked frequency of exercise during the lockdown on a ordinal scale ranging from less than 1 time a week; Once a week; 2-3 times a week;4-5 times a week; More than 5 times a week

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026