Skip to content

Endoscopically One-year Follow-up in Patients After Small-bowel Transplantation

Endoscopically One-year Follow-up in Patients After Small-bowel Transplantation, Role of SASAKI Score

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04633486
Enrollment
15
Registered
2020-11-18
Start date
2012-04-01
Completion date
2019-11-15
Last updated
2020-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intestinal Graft Dysfunction

Keywords

endoscopic monitoring, intestinal transplantation

Brief summary

Intestinal transplantation is associated with high numbers of ejection events. A close endoscopic controll of the intestinal graft is possible. Sasaki et al. presented 2002 an endoscopic score using zoom-endoscopes for early detection of rejection events.

Detailed description

Small bowel transplantation is a potentially life-saving procedure for patients with irreversible gut failure, especially for those with total parenteral nutrition complications, inability to adapt to quality-of-life limitations posed by intestinal failure, and high risk of death if the native gut is not removed. Endoscopy provides the quickest method for assessing the overall health of graft mucosa and is essential in obtaining specimens from large areas for histologic evaluation, which continues to remain the gold standard for a diagnosis of rejection. Recently, the use of zoom videoendoscopy has been reported as a better evaluation of intestinal mucosa than the use of a standard endoscope. Acute cellular rejection in short-term follow-up, appears with acute and dramatic clinical symptoms (fever, vomiting, nausea, increased stomal output/diarrhea, abdominal pain, and distension), so that it is rarely predictable with surveillance. Comparison of endoscopic and histo-pathologic findings should be performed.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTzoom-endoscopy

Endoscopic monitoring of intestinal transplant recipients is done with zoom-endoscopes for exact diagnostic of intestinal mucosa.

Sponsors

University Hospital Tuebingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* intestinal transplant recipients

Exclusion criteria

* younger age (\< 16)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of congruent findings of zoom-endoscopy and pathological examinations12 monthsReliability of zoom-endoscopy and pathological examinations

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026