Skip to content

Multimodality Assessment of Ventricular Scar Arrhythmogenicity.

Can MRI-based Computational Modelling of the Heart be Used to Predict Critical Substrate in Scar-dependent Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04632394
Enrollment
18
Registered
2020-11-17
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2024-04-02
Last updated
2025-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventricular Tachycardia

Keywords

ventricular tachycardia, ablation, cardiac MRI, computational modelling

Brief summary

We aim to improve our understanding of a life-threatening heart rhythm disorder known as ventricular tachycardia (VT). This is a disorder which originates from the lower chamber of the heart and frequently is associated with heart disease. We will use an MRI scan to generate a computer based model of the heart which can predict areas of the heart which are important in generating this rhythm disorder. We intend to assess how accurate this computer model is compared to traditional invasive assessment of the heart muscle. We also aim to assess the electrical characteristics of those areas which were predicted by the computer model in order to see why they were thought to be so important. All patients seen at St George's Hospital with VT will be eligible. As is routine for these patients, they will have an MRI scan of the heart. We will then use this scan to create a virtual reconstruction of the heart from which predictions of the critical areas of the heart which are generating the rhythm problem will be made. Then we will perform a VT ablation (studying the electrical properties and if necessary making a burn to treat the rhythm problem) - as per standard of care, however during the ablation we will spend extra time collecting information comparing the accuracy of the computer-generated model to the traditional invasive signals which guide ablation. We will study the electrical properties of those predicted areas to see what is special about them. The study will last up to three years.

Detailed description

Patients will be eligible for this trial both from referrals as an outpatient, where VT has been detected on a heart rhythm monitor or ECG (electrical heart tracing), or as an inpatient where they have been admitted to hospital with symptoms of VT. Our study investigators will discuss the research with the patient and give them the relevant information in an understandable format as part of a Patient Information Sheet so that they can make an informed decision about whether or not to participate in the research. An MRI scan of the heart is a standard investigation for patients presenting with VT, however if the patient is included in the study, the MRI scan images will be anonymised and sent confidentially to the Institute of Computational Modelling at Johns Hopkins University in USA where the images will be reconstructed into a 3D representation of the patients heart, where the electrical pathways and source of the VT can be seen. This information will be sent back (again confidentially and anonymously) to St George's Hospital in time for their routine VT ablation procedure. During the VT ablation The MRI scan model will be combined with the invasively-obtained information and we will assess the various areas of the heart which are responsible for the VT, particularly relating to areas of scar within the heart, which are frequently seen in these patients. We will assess the electrical properties of the areas highlighted as the cause of the VT from the MRI scan. We will assess the accuracy of the computer model compared to the traditional invasive measurements that we take. We will first ablate those areas of the heart which the model predicted as being important (as long as the invasive characteristics support ablation there) and then see what effect this had on the electrical properties of other areas of the heart. However, we will not ablate any area of the heart based solely on the MRI model; it will only influence the order of ablation and not tell us whether to ablate or not. The procedure can take 4-6 hours in total. The extra information gathered as part of the research protocol may extend this by a maximum of 10%. No extra pieces of equipment, procedures or medications are involved in the research, just the time taken to generate a computer model of the heart as well as a extra time to assess the heart in more detail during the ablation. Following the ablation, the patients will be followed at 3, 6 and 12 months with a heart rhythm monitor and a clinical review as an outpatient as per routine standard of care. From this, we will collect data on frequency of recurrence of rhythm disturbance, therapy from their implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, symptoms and complications following the ablation procedure. The information gathered during the procedure will be analysed and research papers generated from the results.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTGeneration of computational model from cardiac MRI.

Routine cardiac MRI scan results will be sent to Johns Hopkins University where a computer-generated model of the heart will be made, which will demonstrate predicted areas critical to VT generation and maintenance. This data will be sent back to St George's, and integrated with the standard VT ablation mapping software to allow comparison of its accuracy with standard mapping techniques.

PROCEDUREVT ablation

Routine VT ablation as described elsewhere in the literature. However, a brief period of extra time (\ 30 minutes) will be spent analysing the areas of the heart which the MRI scan predicted as being important for generation of VT. We will study the effect of ablation of these areas (if indicated) on distant parts of the heart.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
St George's, University of London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Adult inpatients admitted to St George's Hospital London with sustained ventricular tachycardia or outpatients identified from the arrhythmia clinic with significant monomorphic ventricular tachycardia noted on cardiac monitoring who: * Have sustained, monomorphic scar-dependent ventricular tachycardia * Are symptomatic * Failed, unable or unwilling to tolerate anti-arrhythmic medications * Able to have a cardiac MRI * Have a life expectancy \> 1 year * At least 40 days following a myocardial infarction

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under the age of 18 * Patients who are unable to give informed consent * Pregnant patients * Unable to have cardiac MRI * Prohibitive procedural risk * Unable to tolerate the ablation procedure due to haemodynamic instability

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrogram Duration at Digital Twin Predicted Sites Compared to Non-predicted SitesDuring ablationDuration of electrograms at digital twin predicted sites compared to non-predicted sites on invasive mapping within areas of bipolar low voltage (\<1.5mV)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Assessment at 12 Month Clinical Follow up12 monthsAssessment of patient's symptoms at a clinical consultation following the ablation.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort
Cohort of patients who underwent digital twin generation and VT ablation.
18
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Age, Continuous68.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Electrogram Duration at Digital Twin Predicted Sites Compared to Non-predicted Sites

Duration of electrograms at digital twin predicted sites compared to non-predicted sites on invasive mapping within areas of bipolar low voltage (\<1.5mV)

Time frame: During ablation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Predicted SitesElectrogram Duration at Digital Twin Predicted Sites Compared to Non-predicted Sites77.5 msStandard Deviation 25.8
Non-predicted SitesElectrogram Duration at Digital Twin Predicted Sites Compared to Non-predicted Sites65.7 msStandard Deviation 40
Secondary

Symptom Assessment at 12 Month Clinical Follow up

Assessment of patient's symptoms at a clinical consultation following the ablation.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia at 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Predicted SitesSymptom Assessment at 12 Month Clinical Follow up2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026