Spinal Cord Injuries
Conditions
Brief summary
In a current first-in-human study, called Stimulation Movement Overground (STIMO, NCT02936453), Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord is applied to enable individuals with chronic severe spinal cord injury (SCI) to complete intensive locomotor neurorehabilitation training. In this clinical feasibility study, it was demonstrated that EES results in an immediate enhancement of walking function, and that when applied repeatedly as part of a neurorehabilitation program, EES can improve leg motor control and trigger neurological recovery in individuals with severe SCI to a certain extent (Wagner et al. 2018). Preclinical studies showed that linking brain activity to the onset and modulation of spinal cord stimulation protocols not only improves the usability of the stimulation, but also augments neurological recovery. Indeed, rats rapidly learned to modulate their cortical activity in order to adjust the amplitude of spinal cord stimulation protocols. This brain-spine interface allowed them to increase the amplitude of the movement of their otherwise paralyzed legs to climb up a staircase (Bonizzato et al. 2018). Moreover, gait rehabilitation enabled by this brain-spine interface (BSI) augmented plasticity and neurological recovery. When EES was correlated with cortical neuron activity during training, rats showed better recovery than when training was only supported by continuous stimulation (Bonizzato et al. 2018). This concept of brain spine-interface was validated in non-human primates (Capogrosso et al. 2016). Clinatec (Grenoble, France) has developed a fully implantable electrocorticogram (ECoG) recording device with a 64-channel epidural electrode array capable of recording electrical signals from the motor cortex for an extended period of time and with a high signal to noise ratio the electrical signals from the motor cortex. This ECoG-based system allowed tetraplegic patients to control an exoskeleton (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02550522) with up to 8 degrees of freedom for the upper limb control (Benabid et al. 2019). This device was implanted in 2 individuals so far; one of them has been using this system both at the hospital and at home for more than 3 years. We hypothesize that ECoG-controlled EES in individuals with SCI will establish a direct bridge between the patient's motor intention and the spinal cord below the lesion, which will not only improve or restore voluntary control of leg movements, but will also boost neuroplasticity and neurological recovery when combined with neurorehabilitation.
Interventions
DEVICESTIMO-BSI system implantation
Participants are implanted bilaterally with epidural electrocorticography devices. The decoded motor intentions are driving the implanted spinal cord stimulation system. Brain-controlled spinal cord stimulation is used for training and rehabilitation to recover voluntary movements.
DEVICEARC-BSI Lumbar System
ARC-BSI Lumbar System for participants entering the optional extension with system upgrade: replacement of the neurostimulator, and upgrade of the WIMAGINE system and STIMO system wearable devices.
Sponsors
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Having completed the main phase of the STIMO study (NCT02936453). * SCI graded as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B, C & D * Level of lesion: T10 and above, based on AIS level determination by the PI, with preservation of conus function * The intact distance between the cone and the lesion must be at least 60 mm. * Focal spinal cord disorder caused by either trauma or epidural, subdural or intramedullary bleeding * Minimum 12 months post-injury * Completed in-patient rehabilitation program * Stable medical, physical and psychological condition as considered by Investigators * Able to understand and interact with the study team in French or English * Adequate care-giver support and access to appropriate medical care in patient's home community * Must agree to comply in good faith with all conditions of the study and to attend all required study training and visit * Must provide and sign the Informed Consent prior to any study related procedures
Exclusion criteria
* Limitation of walking function based on accompanying (CNS) disorders (systemic malignant disorders, cardiovascular disorders restricting physical training, peripheral nerve disorders) * History of severe autonomic dysreflexia * Brain damage * Epilepsy * Spinal stenosis * Use of an intrathecal Baclofen pump. * Any active implanted cardiac device such as pacemaker or defibrillator. * Any indication that would require diathermy. * Any indication that would require MRI. * Increased risk for defibrillation. * Severe joint contractures disabling or restricting lower limb movements. * Haematological disorders with increased risk for surgical interventions (increased risk of haemorrhagic events). * Congenital or acquired lower limb abnormalities (affection of joints and bone). * Women who are pregnant (pregnancy test obligatory for women of childbearing potential) or breast feeding or not willing to take contraception. * Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse. * Spinal cord lesion due to either a neurodegenerative disease or a tumor. * Gastrointestinal ulcers in the last five years * Known or suspected eye disorders or diseases * Other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.) * Any other anatomic or co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the study results
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Measure | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | Number of Adverse Events possibly, probably or causally related to the procedure or device. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10mWT | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | — |
| Weight bearing capacity | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | — |
| SCIM III score | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome |
| 6minWT | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | — |
| Time Up and Go | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | — |
| Maximum Voluntary Contraction | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | — |
| ASIA score | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome |
| WISCI II score | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | From 0 to 20, higher scores mean a better outcome |
| Berg Balance Scale | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | From 0 to 56, higher scores mean a better outcome |
| Gait Analysis | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | Average step height, step length, amplitude of EMG activity during walking |
| WHOQOL-BREF | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome |
| BCI performance measures | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | Decoding accuracy from 0-100% higher numbers mean a better outome |
| Upper Limb Neurobiomechanics | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | Average range of movement, amplitude of EMG activity during upper limb movements |
| ECoG signal stability | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | Power density spectrum of the ECoG signal over each electrode |
| SSEP | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | Amplitude and latency of the cortically evoked potentials |
| Modified Ashworth Scale | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation | From 0 to 4, higher scores mean a worst outcome |
Countries
Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed