Skip to content

Comparison of Passive and Active Joint Mobilization for Chronic Ankle Instability

Comparison of Passive and Active Joint Mobilization for Chronic Ankle Instability: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04630899
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-11-16
Start date
2021-09-30
Completion date
2021-12-30
Last updated
2025-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Joint, Chronic Instability of Joint, Musculoskeletal Manipulations

Brief summary

The features of CAI were confirmed through studies that 64% to 77% had extra-articular conditions mainly related to calf tendon disorder. In addition, joints are laxity, sensory motors are deficient, and the range of dorsi flexion is decreased. this study is to investigate the effects of active joint mobilization(AJM) under weight-bearing conditions to stimulate various proprioceptors for CAI with deficiency in sensorimotor and postural control.

Interventions

OTHERActive joint mobilization

The participants bend his knees in a prone position. The physical therapist holds the medial malleolus with one hand and the lateral malleolus with the other. At the same time, the physical therapist touches the participant's soles to the sternum area and presses them in the dorsal direction. At this time, medial malleolus glides anterior and lateral malleolus glides posterior. The first procedure is to passively recognize movement. The second procedure is accompanied by active movement of the participant.

PJM uses Maitland's Mobilization method, grade III (high amplitude in the end range of the joint and 1 second vibration in the middle range through linear motion in which tissue resistance is felt). The participant is in a supine position, and the physical therapist holds the talus with one hand and the tibia with the other hand, and performs joint mobilization in the posterior direction with the hand holding the talus.

Sponsors

Sahmyook University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First ankle sprain one year before clinical trial * A score of less than 24 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) * No ankle sprains occurred within 4 weeks of starting the test * Two or more more ankle sprains in the past month

Exclusion criteria

* If you have a history of lower extremity surgery * In case of receiving treatment for the affected ankle within 1 month * If you have a psychological problem

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ankle instability4 weeksConsists of 9 questions, 3 to 0 points for 5 questions, 4 to 0 points for 2 questions, 5 to 0 points for 1 question, and 2 to 0 points for another question. A total score of 30 points is the highest, 28 points or more are stable ankle joints, and 24 points or less are unstable ankle joints. The higher the score, the closer to normal, and the lower the score, the lower the stability.
Range of motion4 weeksMeasured based on the accelerometer sensor built into the mobile phone with a clinometer app. After fixing the mobile phone on the participant's sole, press 0 clear to calibrate it to the initial value. The physical therapist asks the participant to flex the foot in the dorsal direction Measure a total of 2 times and record it as an average value.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026