Skip to content

Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate Implants in Thin and Thick Buccal Plates of Bone in Esthetic Zone

Clinical Assessment of Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate Implants in Thin and Thick Buccal Plates of Bone and Its Implication on Esthetics. A Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04630665
Enrollment
18
Registered
2020-11-16
Start date
2019-01-23
Completion date
2022-11-02
Last updated
2024-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Buccal Bone Thickness

Brief summary

To achieve esthetic immediate implants a minimum of adequate buccal bone thickness must be present. It was postulated that 2 mm of buccal bone thickness was needed to prevent recession of the buccal plate. However, this was reduced to 1 mm with more ongoing research. In a recent study postulated that a buccal bone thickness less than 1 mm could be sufficient. Scarce literature was found that monitored the ridge alterations following implant placement. In regards to the controversies regarding the minimal initial buccal bone thickness required to perform immediate implant placement, our study aims to monitor the buccal bone thickness and soft tissue changes over a year from implant and prosthetic placement.

Interventions

OTHERimmediate implant placement

immediate implant placement in thin and thick buccal bony plates

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who have at least one unrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone that needs to be extracted. * Subjects with healthy systemic condition. * Availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest. * Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits. * Smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
buccal bone thickness1 yearmeasurement of buccal bone thickness by a specially designed device and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pink esthetic score (PES)1 yearto assess esthetics, the score is from 0-14 0 being worst , 14 being best.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026