Skip to content

Comparison of Microwave Ablation With Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Tumor

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation With Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Tumor

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04626986
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-11-13
Start date
2020-09-18
Completion date
2023-05-30
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Conserving Surgery, Breast Tumor, Microwave Ablation

Brief summary

The investigators will perform this study to prospectively compare the clinical outcome after percutaneous microwave ablation(MWA) and breast conserving surgery of benign and malignant breast lesion under ultrasound (US) guidance.

Detailed description

A total of more than 300 patients diagnosed with breast tumor in multiple centers will be recruited in this study and underwent US-guided percutaneous MWA and breast conserving surgery treatment. Information for each patient includes demographics; longest diameters of tumors; tumor numbers; tumor pathological type; location of tumor according to whether adjacent to skin, pectoralis, areola and papilla. Ablation variables including session, puncture, time, and power; complete ablation, complications; reduction in volume, palpability, pain and cosmetic satisfying outcomes,recurrence,survival will be compared and analyzed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmicrowave ablation

Microwave ablation has the advantages of aesthetics, precise positioning, minimally invasive and painless for patients with early breast cancer.The tumor can be completely killed without injurying adjacent tissue. Some studies have suggested MWA is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of breast cancer.

PROCEDUREbreast conserving surgery

The treatment of early-stage breast cancer tends to be less-invasive including less morbidity, shorter hospitalization, and improved cosmetic results. Many reports have concluded that there was no difference between breast-conserving surgery and the traditional radical mastectomy for early stage breast cancer in time to distant metastases or overall survival, so breast-conserving surgery is becoming an alternative treatment for early-stage breast cancer.

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. women, 2. with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to core-needle 3. tumor measuring 50mm or smaller, no axillary lymph node metastasis or Ipsilateral grade I and II axillary lymph node metastasis, movable(pT0-2N0-1M0 ) 4. located at least 10 mm from the skin surface and chest wall.

Exclusion criteria

1. men 2. women who were pregnant or breastfeeding 3. radiologic suspicion of multifocality or extensive intraductal carcinoma 4. histologic diagnosis of lobular carcinoma 5. neoadjuvant therapy 6. previous surgery or radiation therapy of the ipsilateral breast.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival:Defined as the length of time from the beginning of treatment to death or the last follow-up (if no death)5 yearsDefined as the length of time from the beginning of treatment to death or the last follow-up (if no death)
cosmetic satisfaction:Patients are rated whether they are satisfied with the surgical scars(bad / moderate /good / very good)3 yearsPatients are rated whether they are satisfied with the surgical scars(bad / moderate /good / very good)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
local tumor progress:Defined as the proportion of patients with active tumor at the edge of the treatment :Defined as the proportion of patients with active tumor at the edge of the treatment5 yearsDefined as the proportion of patients with active tumor at the edge of the treatment area during follow-up after the tumor was completely treated
metastasis:Defined as the proportion of cases with metastasis from the beginning of the study to the end of the study or the death of the patient5 yearsDefined as the proportion of cases with metastasis from the beginning of the study to the end of the study or the death of the patient
complication:Defined as numbers of participants with side effect and major complications to the end of the study or the death of the patient5 yearsDefined as numbers of participants with side effect and major complications to the end of the study or the death of the patient

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJie Yu, Dr.
jiemi301@163.com66937981

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026