Skip to content

The Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of ANIMERS Chiara LA and JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® for Aging Mid-Face

The Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of ANIMERS Chiara LA and JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® for Aging Mid-Face

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04622085
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-11-09
Start date
2021-04-06
Completion date
2023-05-09
Last updated
2023-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging Mid-Face, Dermal Filler, Hyaluronic Acid, Lidocaine

Brief summary

This study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness for the correction of aging mid-face of treatment group compared with the active control group.

Interventions

DEVICEANIMERS Chiara LA

20mg/SciVision Biotech Inc.

DEVICEJUVÉDERM VOLUMA®

20mg/Allergan, Inc.

Sponsors

SciVision Biotech Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 30 to 60 years of male or female 2. MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) of midface graded 2 to 5 by evaluator.

Exclusion criteria

1. Injection site with infection or other skin diseases present which may affect the evaluation 2. With medical history of chromatosis, discoloration, keloid formation, hypertrophic scarring at midface 3. With permanent implants or planning to receive permanent implants during the study period at the injection sites 4. Hyaluronate facial dermal implant injection or other impermanent dermal fillers injection at injection sites within the past 6 months 5. With under-eye facial Botox or fat injection within the past 6 months or planning to receive under-eye facial Botox or fat injection during the study period 6. With Major surgery 3 months before the start of the trial 7. With under-eye facial chemical or lasers peeling, non-invasive skin tightening, thermocool within the past 3 months or planning to receive these aesthetic procedures during the study period 8. With systemic immunosuppressive therapy or systemic corticosteroids within the past 2 months or planning to receive these therapies during the study period (subjects who have received inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids could be considered to include.) 9. With clinical meaningful coagulation disorders, underdoing anticoagulant treatment or within the past 10 days, or taking blood circulation promotion and blood stasis movement medications 10. With epilepsy or porphyria 11. With congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia or glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency 12. With analgesic dependence, analgesics within the past 2 weeks or planning to receive analgesics during the study period 13. With history of hypersensitivity or allergy to lidocaine, amide anesthetics, hyaluronic acid or any component of the device; Gram-positive bacterial or Streptococcus proteins; other severe hypersensitivity history unsuitable for participating in the study 14. Planning to undergo any surgery which may cause significant body weight change (such as bariatric surgery) or take any medication which may cause significant body weight change 15. Pregnant, planning pregnancy or in breastfeeding females 16. Participated in clinical study of other device or drug and have not terminated within the past 30 days -Other circumstances which judged to be unsuitable for participating in the study by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rate of a ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS)6 months post-injectionThe response rate is ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) as assessed by the evaluator at 6 months. Evaluators assess the midface volume deficit scale (MFVDS) on site with 5 graded scale, 0 to 5 was represented 'Fullness' to 'Severe concavity'.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MFVDS value evaluated by blinded-evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injectionEvaluators assess the midface volume deficit scale on site with 5 graded scale, 0 to 5 was represented 'Fullness' to 'Severe concavity'.
A Response rate of MFVDS value evaluated by blinded-evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injectionThe response rate is ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of the MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) as assessed by the evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months. Evaluators assess the midface volume deficit scale (MFVDS) on site with 5 graded scale, 0 to 5 was represented 'Fullness' to 'Severe concavity'.
GAIS evaluated photographically by blinded-evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injectionEvaluators and subjects assess the improvement of correction with 5 graded scale,1 to 5 was represented 'exceptional improvement' to 'worsened'.
Face fullness value evaluated by the digital image scoring system after injection and post 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injectionThe digital image scoring system analyzes the volume change (ml). A higher score means more volume increased in the midface.
Adverse events reported during the study periodImmediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injectionThe safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
Serious adverse events reported during the study periodImmediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injectionThe safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
Device failure reported before injectionBefore injectionThe safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
VAS pain evaluated immediately and 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injectionImmediate,15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injectionThe VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026