Skip to content

RESPONSE: Response to Seladelpar in Subjects With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and an Inadequate Control to or an Intolerance to Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA)

RESPONSE: A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Seladelpar in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and an Inadequate Response to or an Intolerance to Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04620733
Enrollment
193
Registered
2020-11-09
Start date
2021-04-21
Completion date
2023-08-11
Last updated
2024-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Keywords

Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC), PBC

Brief summary

The purposes of this study are to evaluate the treatment effect of seladelpar on composite biochemical improvement in cholestasis markers based on ALP and total bilirubin and to evaluate the safety of seladelpar over 12 months of treatment compared to placebo. The study also checked the effect of treatment on the symptoms of PBC, including pruritus.

Interventions

Seladelpar 10 mg one capsule daily for double-blind period, for a duration of up to 12 months

DRUGPlacebo

One capsule daily for double-blind period, for a duration of up to 12 months

DRUGSeladelpar 5 mg

If down-titration needed, one capsule daily for double-blind period, for a duration of up to 12 months

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Must have given written informed consent (signed and dated) and any authorizations required by local law. * Male or female with a definitive diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). * Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for the past 12 months (stable dose for \>3 months prior to screening) or intolerant to UDCA (last dose of UDCA \>3 months prior to screening). * Laboratory parameters measured by the Central Laboratory at screening: * Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥1.67× ULN (upper limit of normal) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤3× ULN * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤3× ULN * Total bilirubin ≤2× ULN * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \>45 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 (calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation). * International normalized ratio (INR) below 1.1× ULN (For individuals on anticoagulation therapy, INR must be maintained in the range required for prophylaxis for their specific disease). * Platelet count ≥100 ×10\^3/µL. * Females of reproductive potential must use at least 1 barrier contraceptive and a second effective birth control method during the study and for at least 90 days after the last dose. Male individuals who are sexually active with female partners of reproductive potential must use barrier contraception, and their female partners must use a second effective birth control method during the study and for at least 90 days after the last dose. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Previous exposure to seladelpar (MBX-8025). * A medical condition other than PBC that, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude full participation in the study (e.g., cancer) or confound its results (e.g., Paget's disease, any active infection). * Advanced PBC as defined by the Rotterdam criteria (albumin below the lower limit of normal and total bilirubin above 1.0 × ULN). * Presence of clinically important hepatic decompensation, including the following: * History of liver transplantation, current placement on liver transplantation list, or current Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥12. For individuals on anticoagulation medication, evaluation of the baseline INR, in concert with their current dose adjustments of their anticoagulant medication, will be taken into account when calculating the MELD score. This will be done in consultation with the medical monitor. * Complications of portal hypertension, including known esophageal varices, history of variceal bleeds or related interventions (e.g., transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement), ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. * Cirrhosis with complications, including history or presence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or hepatorenal syndrome. * Other chronic liver diseases: * Current features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as determined by the investigator based on immunoserology, liver biochemistry, or historic confirmed liver histology. * PSC determined by the presence of diagnostic cholangiographic findings. * History or clinical evidence of alcoholic liver disease. * History or clinical evidence of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. * History of biopsy confirmed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). * History or evidence of Gilbert's syndrome with elevated total bilirubin. * History or evidence of hemochromatosis. * Hepatitis B, defined as the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen. * Hepatitis C, defined as the presence of hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid. * History, evidence, or high suspicion of hepatobiliary malignancy based on imaging, screening laboratory values, and/or clinical symptoms. * Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or positive antibody test at screening * Clinically important alcohol consumption, defined as more than 2 drink units per day (equivalent to 20 g) in women and 3 drink units per day (equivalent to 30 g) in men, or inability to quantify alcohol intake reliably. * History of malignancy diagnosed or treated, actively or within 2 years, or ongoing evaluation for malignancy; localized treatment of squamous or noninvasive basal cell skin cancers and cervical carcinoma in situ is allowed if appropriately treated prior to screening. * Treatment with obeticholic acid (OCA) or fibrates (e.g., bezafibrate, fenofibrate, elafibranor, lanifibranor, pemafibrate, saroglitizar) 6 weeks prior to screening. * Treatment with colchicine, methotrexate, azathioprine, or long-term systemic corticosteroids (\>2 weeks) during 2 months prior to screening * Treatment with anti-pruritic drugs (e.g., cholestyramine, naltrexone, rifampicin, sertraline, or any experimental approach) must be on a stable dose within 1 month prior to screening * Treatment with any other investigational therapy or device within 30 days or within 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening * For females, pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Any other condition(s) that would compromise the safety of the individual or compromise the quality of the clinical study, as judged by the investigator. * Immunosuppressant therapies. * Other medications that effect liver or gastrointestinal (GI) functions, such as absorption of medications or the roux-en-y gastric bypass procedure, may be prohibited and should be discussed with the medical monitor on a case-by-case basis. * Active Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection during Screening. Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Response Criteria for the Composite Endpoint of ALP <1.67 × Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), ≥15% Reduction in ALP, and Total Bilirubin ≤ 1.0× ULN at Month 12Month 12Percentages were rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsFirst dose date up to last dose plus 30 days (up to 13.4 months)Percentages were rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Shift of ≥ 2 CTCAE Grades From Baseline in Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Related to Hematology and Select Liver BiochemistryFirst dose date up to last dose (up to 13.4 months)Treatment-emergent graded laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least 2 toxicity grade from baseline at any time post baseline. The laboratory abnormalities were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening laboratory abnormality. The data is reported for shift of ≥ 2 grades from baseline in values for hematology and select liver biochemistry. Hematology includes parameters like RBCs, (erythrocytes), hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, WBC, WBC differentials (absolute and percentage) including basophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and monocytes, etc. Biochemistry included select liver function tests like blood bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase. Percentages were rounded-off.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With ALP ≤1.0× ULN at Month 12Month 12Percentages were rounded-off.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Participants With NRS ≥ 4 at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Pruritus NRS is used to rate the intensity of the itching experienced by the participants in the past 24 hours from no itching to worst possible itching by selecting a number from 0 to 10 on Itch Scale. Zero means no itching and 10 means worst imaginable itching.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in the Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North America.

Pre-assignment details

360 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo to match seladelpar, orally, once daily, for a duration of up to 12 months.
65
Seladelpar
Participants received seladelpar 10 mg, orally, once daily, for a duration of up to 12 months.
128
Total193

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event43
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation11
Overall StudyReason Not Specified01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalSeladelpar
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants41 Participants29 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
53 Participants152 Participants99 Participants
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels313.8 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 117.68
314.3 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 120.9
314.6 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 122.96
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants56 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
38 Participants135 Participants97 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Participants With Baseline Pruritus NRS ≥ 46.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44
6.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43
6.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.42
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants170 Participants114 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
13 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
1 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
1 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 Participants61 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants183 Participants123 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 128
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 6566 / 128
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 659 / 128

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Response Criteria for the Composite Endpoint of ALP <1.67 × Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), ≥15% Reduction in ALP, and Total Bilirubin ≤ 1.0× ULN at Month 12

Percentages were rounded-off.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The Intend-to-treat Analysis Set was defined as any participant who was randomized into the study and received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Criteria for the Composite Endpoint of ALP <1.67 × Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), ≥15% Reduction in ALP, and Total Bilirubin ≤ 1.0× ULN at Month 1220.0 percentage of participants
SeladelparPercentage of Participants With Response Criteria for the Composite Endpoint of ALP <1.67 × Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), ≥15% Reduction in ALP, and Total Bilirubin ≤ 1.0× ULN at Month 1261.7 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [27.7, 53.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Shift of ≥ 2 CTCAE Grades From Baseline in Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Related to Hematology and Select Liver Biochemistry

Treatment-emergent graded laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least 2 toxicity grade from baseline at any time post baseline. The laboratory abnormalities were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening laboratory abnormality. The data is reported for shift of ≥ 2 grades from baseline in values for hematology and select liver biochemistry. Hematology includes parameters like RBCs, (erythrocytes), hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, WBC, WBC differentials (absolute and percentage) including basophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and monocytes, etc. Biochemistry included select liver function tests like blood bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase. Percentages were rounded-off.

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (up to 13.4 months)

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Shift of ≥ 2 CTCAE Grades From Baseline in Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Related to Hematology and Select Liver BiochemistryShift ≥ 2 CTCAE grades in haematology12.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Shift of ≥ 2 CTCAE Grades From Baseline in Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Related to Hematology and Select Liver BiochemistryShift ≥ 2 CTCAE grades in biochemistry6.2 percentage of participants
SeladelparPercentage of Participants With Shift of ≥ 2 CTCAE Grades From Baseline in Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Related to Hematology and Select Liver BiochemistryShift ≥ 2 CTCAE grades in haematology14.1 percentage of participants
SeladelparPercentage of Participants With Shift of ≥ 2 CTCAE Grades From Baseline in Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Related to Hematology and Select Liver BiochemistryShift ≥ 2 CTCAE grades in biochemistry7.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

Percentages were rounded-off.

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose plus 30 days (up to 13.4 months)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set was defined as any participant who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAEs84.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs6.2 percentage of participants
SeladelparPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAEs86.7 percentage of participants
SeladelparPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs7.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Participants With NRS ≥ 4 at Month 6

Pruritus NRS is used to rate the intensity of the itching experienced by the participants in the past 24 hours from no itching to worst possible itching by selecting a number from 0 to 10 on Itch Scale. Zero means no itching and 10 means worst imaginable itching.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The Moderate to Severe Pruritus NRS Analysis Set included participants in the Intent-to-treat Analysis Set who had a baseline NRS value ≥ 4. Participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Participants With NRS ≥ 4 at Month 6-1.7 score on scaleStandard Error 0.41
SeladelparChange From Baseline in Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Participants With NRS ≥ 4 at Month 6-3.2 score on scaleStandard Error 0.28
p-value: 0.004795% CI: [-2.5, -0.5]MMRM
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALP ≤1.0× ULN at Month 12

Percentages were rounded-off.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Participants in Intent-to-treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ALP ≤1.0× ULN at Month 120.0 percentage of participants
SeladelparPercentage of Participants With ALP ≤1.0× ULN at Month 1225.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.3, 33.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 5, 2026