Skip to content

P-CHAT: Comparison of Direct to Consumer Delivery Models for Hearing Devices

Patient-Centered Hearing Aid Trial: Comparison of Direct to Consumer Delivery Models for Hearing Devices

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04618315
Acronym
P-CHAT
Enrollment
584
Registered
2020-11-05
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Aids, Hearing Loss

Brief summary

Satisfaction and benefit from hearing aids fit using two patient self fit methods will be compared against those fit using audiology-based best practices. Individuals between the ages of 50 and 79 years of age will be randomly assigned to one of three fitting methods. Benefit and satisfaction will be evaluated six weeks and six months after the initial fitting.

Detailed description

Hearing aids are the most pertinent treatment for most adults with hearing loss, a pervasive chronic health problem in \ 40% of those over the age of 60 years. Only 20% of these individuals purchase and use hearing aids. The Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act of 2017 is designed to increase affordability and accessibility, and thereby adoption, of hearing aids. While this legislation directs the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to create and administer this new channel of hearing aid provision by 2020, best practices related to hearing aid provision without the involvement of a professional, licensed provider have not been explored and established. Patients do not have the evidence they need to decide between modes of acquiring hearing aids. The current proposal addresses the specific knowledge gap of efficacious direct-to-consumer hearing aid delivery models. Two methods of patient-driven methods of selecting and fitting hearing aids will be compared against audiology-based best practice fitting. Individuals who perceive mild or moderate hearing difficulty will be randomly assigned to one of three fitting arms. Satisfaction and benefit from hearing aids will be assessed at six weeks and six months after initial fit.

Interventions

DEVICEHearing Aids

Receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The principle investigators and the audiologists conducting the outcome measures will be blinded to group assignment.

Intervention model description

Three arm blinded randomized control trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 50 - 79 years old. * Mild or moderate hearing difficulty. * Normal cognition. * No prior hearing aid experience. * Ability and willingness to pay privately ($650.00) for hearing aids * Ability to read and understand English * Symmetric hearing loss, no greater than moderate in degree

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit6 weeks66-item self-assessment, disability-based inventory. Participants answer the questionnaire twice, first prior to use of hearing aids and then after hearing aid use. The questionnaire is scored between 0-99% with higher values representing greater difficulty. Benefit is reported as the difference between the two scores with a higher number signifying greater benefit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly6 weeksA self-administered scale to identify problems related to hearing loss. The questionnaire has 25 items and can be scored between 0 and 100. The score after hearing aid use is subtracted from the baseline score (prior to hearing aid use) to obtain the benefit score. The higher the difference the greater the benefit.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Hearing Aid Use6 weeksAverage hours of hearing aid use per day.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Audiology-Based Best Practice
Hearing aids will be fit using current best practices used by audiologists to fit hearing aids. Hearing Aids: Receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids.
190
Consumer Decides
Hearing aids will be self fit by patients using an interactive application on a tablet computer. Patients will choose their preferred hearing aid settings after comparing four settings with varying loudness levels. Hearing Aids: Receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids.
193
Efficient Fitting
Hearing aids will be self fit by patients using an interactive application on a tablet computer. Patients will choose their preferred hearing aid settings after comparing four settings with varying base and treble settings. Hearing Aids: Receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids.
201
Total584

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAudiology-Based Best PracticeConsumer DecidesEfficient FittingTotal
Age, Continuous68.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.95
69.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71
69.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.57
Better Ear 4-Frequency (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) Pure Tone Average32.1 dB HL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.04
32.64 dB HL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.21
31.47 dB HL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.06
32.06 dB HL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants5 Participants4 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
184 Participants188 Participants197 Participants569 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Hearing Handicap Inventory - Global39.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.83
39.66 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.26
37.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.37
38.82 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.82
Montreal Cognitive Assessment26.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.93
26.18 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
26.37 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96
26.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.93
Profile of Hearing Aid Performance/Benefit39.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.21
40.05 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.76
38.55 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.86
39.44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants2 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
176 Participants187 Participants192 Participants555 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
190 participants193 participants201 participants584 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
111 Participants104 Participants114 Participants329 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
79 Participants89 Participants87 Participants255 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1820 / 1720 / 178
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 1823 / 1725 / 178
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1820 / 1720 / 178

Outcome results

Primary

Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit

66-item self-assessment, disability-based inventory. Participants answer the questionnaire twice, first prior to use of hearing aids and then after hearing aid use. The questionnaire is scored between 0-99% with higher values representing greater difficulty. Benefit is reported as the difference between the two scores with a higher number signifying greater benefit.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Audiology-Based Best PracticeProfile of Hearing Aid Benefit23.34 score on a scale
Consumer DecidesProfile of Hearing Aid Benefit23.27 score on a scale
Efficient FittingProfile of Hearing Aid Benefit23.33 score on a scale
Secondary

Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly

A self-administered scale to identify problems related to hearing loss. The questionnaire has 25 items and can be scored between 0 and 100. The score after hearing aid use is subtracted from the baseline score (prior to hearing aid use) to obtain the benefit score. The higher the difference the greater the benefit.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Audiology-Based Best PracticeHearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly20.65 score on a scale
Consumer DecidesHearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly21.83 score on a scale
Efficient FittingHearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly19.15 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Duration of Hearing Aid Use

Average hours of hearing aid use per day.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Audiology-Based Best PracticeDuration of Hearing Aid Use8.42 hours/day
Consumer DecidesDuration of Hearing Aid Use7.18 hours/day
Efficient FittingDuration of Hearing Aid Use6.83 hours/day

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026