Skip to content

Prehabilitation in Patients Suffering From Gynecological Cancers

Feasibility and Acceptance of High Intensity Interval Training in the Prehabilitation of Patients Suffering From Gynecological Cancers - a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04618094
Enrollment
45
Registered
2020-11-05
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2020-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prehabilitation

Brief summary

In 2016, 2216 Austrian women (= 10% of all new cancer cases) were diagnosed with gynecological tumors. Depending on stage and entity, a main primary therapy option is the surgical tumor resection. In the phase of Prehabilitation (= the time frame from diagnosis to surgical intervention) supportive therapy options such as individualized exercise interventions potentially improve recovery and postoperative outcomes after surgical interventions. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and acceptance of a prehabilitation training intervention with high-intensity interval training compared to a conventional moderate intensity continuous training and a non-training collective. Secondary goals are the investigation of the effectiveness of threshold-based intensity prescriptions and the impact on quality of life, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sexuality and ability to work.

Interventions

OTHERbicycle ergometer training with different intensities

Following a 10-min warm-up phase at a constant work load below ventilatory threshold, participants of the high intensity interval group perform repeated high intensity exercise bouts, followed by an active recovery on a bicycle ergometer. The comparative group perform a constant moderate intensity with the same mean workload. The cool-down phase is 5 min with a constant work load for both groups.

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* histopathologically verified cervical carcinoma (ICD10-C53) or * endometrial carcinoma (ICD10-C54) or * ovarian carcinoma (ICD10-C56) * planned primary/adjuvant surgery or medical training therapy * oncological release for medical training therapy * Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG) 0-II * Age \>18a to 80 * mental aptitude to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* serious orthopaedic, rheumatological, neurological, oncological and cardiovascular diseases which are incompatible with a training intervention * general contraindications for exercise ergometry according to the guidelines of the austrian society of cardiology * osseous or cerebral metastasis * participation in a training study in the last year or already before cancer diagnosis with high training volumes (\>150min moderate / \>75min more intensive endurance training per week)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
adherence to the exercise intervention4 to 8 weeksrate of completed exercise sessions as a measure of feasibility and acceptance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cardiovascular fitness4 to 8 Weeksdetermined by VO2max
workability4 to 8 weeksdetermined by the workability index questionnaire; minimum value 7, maximum value 49, higher values indicating better results
Health related Quality of life: questionnaire4 to 8 weeksdetermined by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire, minimum value 30, maximum value 126, higher scores indicating higher quality of life
Anxiety and depression4 to 8 weeksdetermined by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire, minimum value 14, maximum value 56, higher values indicating higher depression levels
handgrip strength4 to 8 weeksdetermined by the handgrip dynamometer
Cholesterol4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in mg/ml as a part of the evaluation for cardiovascular risk factors
Thyreoglobulin4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in µg/ml as a part of the evaluation for cardiovascular risk factors
body composition4 to 8 weeksdetermined by bioimpedance analysis
Brain natriuretic peptide4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in pg/ml as a part of the evaluation for cardiovascular risk factors
Troponin T4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in µg/ml as a part of the evaluation for cardiovascular risk factors
Creatin Kinase4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in U/l as a part of the evaluation for cardiovascular risk factors
C-reactive protein4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in mg/l as a part of the evaluation for inflammation
interleukin 14 to 8 WeeksLaboratory parameter in ng/ml as a part of the evaluation for inflammation
interleukin 64 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in ng/ml as a part of the evaluation for inflammation
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in pg/ml as a part of the evaluation for inflammation
hemoglobin A1c4 to 8 weeksLaboratory parameter in % as a part of the evaluation for cardiovascular risk factors

Contacts

Primary ContactStefano Palma, MD
stefano.palma@meduniwien.ac.at434040023080

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026