Skip to content

A Comprehensive Approach to Head and Neck Cancer Prehabilitation

A Comprehensive Approach to Head and Neck Cancer Prehabilitation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04617678
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-11-05
Start date
2021-10-21
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer of Head and Neck

Brief summary

Head and neck cancer accounts for 3% of malignancies in the United States. However, the diagnosis and treatment for head and neck cancer is considered to be debilitating. Not because of its morbidity, but due to the extremely rigorous treatment course which has a profound impact on patients physical, social, and emotional functioning. Disfigurement and sensorimotor deficits further compound this impact. Head and neck cancer patients contend with treatments that can significantly affect their quality of life. Treatment regularly results in decreased functional capacity and decreased quality of life. Physical impairments are manifested through, but not limited to, disfigurement, deconditioning, communication issues, "swallowing, speech, breathing, and cancer-related fatigue". Premorbid factors such as preexisting anxiety and depression, chemical dependency, financial barriers, and lack of social support system are unique obstacles to the head and neck cancer population impacting treatment and outcomes. Due to these factors, patients experience higher rates of anxiety and depression, psychological distress, and fear of cancer recurrence. In fact, "compared with other survivors of cancer, head and neck cancer survivors are almost 2 times more likely to die from suicide". In view of the aforementioned research, Roger Maris Cancer Center's head and neck cancer will implement a prehabilitation program that evaluates each patient using standardized screening tools and provide personalized education and interventions. This project evaluates a more comprehensive and proactive multidisciplinary approach to improve treatment and outcomes in head and neck cancer patients.

Interventions

We will assess whether prehabilitation intervention helps mitigate adverse symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression, suicidality, distress, nutritional status, dysphagia, sarcopenia, and well-being) on a sample of head and neck cancer patients. Subjects will attend a Prepare for Surgery Heal Faster session and meet with a physical therapist, registered dietician, speech language pathologist, and masters of social work at pre-treatment, 6-8 weeks post-treatment, and 5-6 months post-treatment completion.

Sponsors

Sanford Health
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of North Dakota
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Non-randomized prospective two-arm clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Equal to or greater than 18 years of age * Diagnosis of head and neck cancer * Actively pursuing cancer treatment with a curative intent * Willing and able to provide written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with cardiac arrhythmia with implanted pacemaker * Patients with other implanted electronic equipment/device * Patients undergoing external defibrillation * Pregnant women (per BIS instructions for use, pregnant women should not participate) * Patient weight exceeding 375 lbs. * Patient has a metal allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the C-SSRS to after treatment.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-upThe Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a validated, self-report instrument assessing suicidality. Higher scores indicate greater suicidality. Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the NCCN Distress Thermometer after treatment.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-upThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer is a validated, self-report instrument assessing psychological health. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress. Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the MDADI to after treatment.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-upThe MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of dysphasia and overall functioning. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning. Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the FACT-H&N (Version 4) to after treatment.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-upThe FACT-H\&N (Version 4) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of dysphasia and overall functioning. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning. Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the BHS-6 to after treatment.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-upThe Behavioral Health Screening 6 (BHS-6) is a validated, self-report instrument assessing psychological health. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress. Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline to after treatment on the 2-min walk test.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe 2-min walk test is a validated objective measure of physical functioning. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Change from baseline to after treatment on the 30 seconds sit to stand.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe 30 seconds sit to stand is a validated objective measure of physical functioning. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Change from baseline to after treatment on the grip strength.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe grip strength is a validated objective measure of physical functioning. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Change from baseline to after treatment on the NFPE.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe Nutrition Focused Physical Exam (NFPE) is a validated objective measure of physical functioning. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Change from baseline to after treatment on the MDADI.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of dysphasia and overall functioning. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Change from baseline to after treatment on the BIS.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe Bioelectic impedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a validated objective measure of physical functioning. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Difference between treatment and control group on sarcopenia measuresPost-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 monthsSarcopenia measures collected via computed tomography will be used to compare patients who completed the prehabilitation program and those who have not.
Change from baseline to after treatment on the FACT-H&N (Version 4).Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe FACT-H\&N (Version 4) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of overall functioning. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Impact of sarcopenia on functioningBaseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 monthsSarcopenia will be measured using bioimpedence spectroscopy technology (BIS), a validated noninvasive measure of volume of fluids in various parts of the body. Functional assessments (sit to stand, grip strength, and two-minute walk test) will be tested as possible predictors of sarcopenia.
Change from baseline to after treatment on the BHS-6.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe Behavioral Health Screening 6 (BHS-6) is a validated self-report measure of psychological health, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Change from baseline to after treatment on the C-SSRS.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a validated self-report measure of psychological health, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
Change from baseline to after treatment on the NCCN Distress Thermometer.Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-upThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer is a validated self-report measure of psychological health, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress. Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCheryl Hysjulien, PsyD

Sanford Health

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026