Skip to content

Volumetric Analysis of Resorption Types on CBCT

Three-dimensional Volumetric/ Linear Analysis and Axial Classification of Root Resorptions Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04617301
Enrollment
43
Registered
2020-11-05
Start date
2020-06-22
Completion date
2020-10-21
Last updated
2020-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endodontic Disease, Tooth Resorption

Keywords

cone beam computed tomography, endodontics, tooth Resorption

Brief summary

More accurate management of resorption can be achieved thanks to the three-dimensions volumetric and linear analysis, and the axial classification presented in this study.

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to investigate the volumetric and linear analysis, and to present the axial classification of root resorptions using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A total of 43 teeth of external cervical resorption (ECR) (n=27), external replacement resorption (ERR) (n=4) and internal root resorption (IRR) (n=12) were identified from 34 patients. The volume of resorption and total tooth, the widest lengths of these resorptions, and the amount of thinnest dentin thickness around them were measured and compared according to age and sex. Additionally, the eight regional axial classification was performed and the percentages in these regions were evaluated. Significance was set at p=0.05 for statistical analysis. More accurate management of resorption can be achieved thanks to the three-dimensions volumetric and linear analysis, and the axial classification presented in this study.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 71 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Cases of resorption that had CBCT images

Exclusion criteria

* those presenting pathologic lesions, congenital/developmental anomalies or teeth with root canal filling * those whose CBCT scans failed to present satisfactory quality. * Additionally, SR, TAP, and EIR cases were excluded because their true dimensions could not be completely determined before resorption.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volume of total tooth and resorbed areafor three months from the beginning of the studyThe total volume and the resorption volume were measured with used 3D semi-automatic segmentation program (ITK-SNAP 2.4)
Measurement widest mesio-distal length, bucco-lingual length and corono-apical length of the resorbed lesionfor three months from the beginning of the studyLinear measurement were measured with used Planmeca ProMax 3D Classic (Planmeca Promax 3D; Planmeca Oy; Helsinki, Finland)
Linear measurements for thinnest dentin (buccal, distal, mesial and lingual/ palatinal) and resorbed area (mesio-distal length and bucco-lingual length) were made on axial sectionsfor three months from the beginning of the studyLinear measurement were measured with used Planmeca ProMax 3D Classic (Planmeca Promax 3D; Planmeca Oy; Helsinki, Finland)
The corono-apical length was measured on sagittal sections where the tooth axis was perpendicular to the ground plane.for three months from the beginning of the studyLinear measurement were measured with used Planmeca ProMax 3D Classic (Planmeca Promax 3D; Planmeca Oy; Helsinki, Finland)
the axial section of the tooth was divided into eight parts and regional settlement classification was performedfor three months from the beginning of the studySegmentation were made with used Planmeca ProMax 3D Classic (Planmeca Promax 3D; Planmeca Oy; Helsinki, Finland)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026