FindTrial
Sign In

Median and Paramedian Anesthesia in Cesarean Section

Assessment of Different Routes Median and Paramedian Anesthesia in Cesarean Section

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04617249
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-11-05
Start date
2020-11-05
Completion date
2021-05-15
Last updated
2020-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Brief summary

The number of cesarean sections worldwide has markedly been increasing since 1985.Intrathecal anesthesia is preferred by most anesthesiologists over general anesthesia

Detailed description

Complications with spinal anesthesia are not common which makes it difficult to detect its incidence and one of the most serious complications is nerve injury.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmedian anesthesia

giving median anesthesia

PROCEDUREparamedian anesthesia

giving paramedian anesthesia

Sponsors

Aljazeera Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

anesthesia with median route versus paramedian route

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-42 years * Scheduled for elective cesarean section * ASA II

Exclusion criteria

* -Age \<18 years or \>42 years * ASA \>II * Emergency cesarean section

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the number of women who will have less pain3 daysthe number of women who will have less pain post procedure

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMahmoud Alalfy
mahmoudalalfy@ymail.com01002611058

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026