Skip to content

A Study of Oral Insulin to Reduce Liver Fat Content in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

An Open-Label Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Potential of Oral Insulin to Reduce Liver Fat Content in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04616014
Enrollment
7
Registered
2020-11-04
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2022-09-15
Last updated
2024-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Brief summary

A Study to Assess the Safety and Potential of Oral Insulin to Reduce Liver Fat Content in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Detailed description

An Open-Label Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Potential of Oral Insulin to Reduce Liver Fat Content in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Interventions

16 mg, QD, two capsules, 8 mg each.

Sponsors

Oramed, Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open Label

Intervention model description

This is an open, multi-center study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female aged 18-70 years. * BMI ≥25. * Known type 2 DM according to American Diabetic Association (one of the three needed): Fasting Plasma Glucose ≥126 mg/dl or 2h postprandial (PG) following 75g OGTT ≥200 mg/dl or HbA1c \> 6.5%28 or on treatment with at least one and no more than three of the following oral anti-diabetic medications, metformin, sulfonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitors, oral GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide), SGLT-2 inhibitor, or Thiazolidinediones (TZDs). * Diagnosis of NAFLD by non-invasive determination of hepatic steatosis grade S1, defined as hepatic steatosis\>8%. by MRI- PDFF and CAP FibroScan ≥ 238 dB/m. * Liver enzyme abnormalities: ULN≤5 times. * Fibrosis score 21≤F≤3 as defined by FibroScan measurement (Liver stiffness measurement, LSM) of 6 ≤ LSM ≤ 12 kPa. * Signature of the written informed consent. * Negative urineserum pregnancy test at Screening study entry for women of childbearing potential (WCBP). * Females must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at screening, prior to the start of the run-in period, at initiation of active dosing and every 4 weeks till the end of the study. A negative urine and serum pregnancy test must be obtained prior to active dosing. Males and females of childbearing potential must use two methods of contraception, one of which must be a highly effective method from the time of screening to the last dosing study visit (22 weeks). Highly effective methods include: * combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception (oral, intravaginal or transdermal) associated with inhibition of ovulation * progestogen-only hormonal contraception (oral, injectable or implantable) associated with inhibition of ovulation * intrauterine device (IUD) * intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) * bilateral tubal occlusion * vasectomised partner (is the sole sexual partner of the WOCBP participating in the trial) * sexual abstinence Acceptable methods include: Double barrier methods of contraception include male condoms plus spermicide, diaphragm with spermicide plus male condom, cervical cap with spermicide plus male condom. If a subject is not usually sexually active but becomes active, he or his partner should use medically accepted forms of contraception. Sperm donations will not be allowed for the duration of the study and for 90 days after the last dose of the study drug. since last menstrual cycle with menopausal levels of FSH (FSH\>40), b) who are surgically menopausal (surgical sterility defined by tubal occlusion, bilateral oophorectomy, bilaterally or hysterectomy). Females of non-childbearing potential are defined as postmenopausal who a) had more than 24 months since last menstrual cycle with menopausal levels of FSH (FSH Level \> 40), b) who are surgically menopausal (surgical sterility defined by tubal occlusion, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy or hysterectomy). * For hypertensive patients, hypertension must be controlled by stable dose of anti-hypertensive medication for at least 2 months prior to screening (and the stable dose can be maintained throughout the study) with BP \< 150/\<95 mmHg * Patients previously treated with vitamin E (\>400IU/day), Polyunsaturated fatty acid (\>2g/day) or Ursodeoxycholic acid fish oil can be included if drugs are stopped at least 3 months prior to enrolment and up to the end of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with active (acute or chronic) liver disease other than NASH (e.g. viral hepatitis, genetic hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, alcohol liver disease, drug induced liver disease) at the time of enrolment. * ALT or AST \> 5 times ULN. * Abnormal synthetic liver function (serum albumin ≤3.5gm%, INR \>1.3). * Known alcohol and/or any other drug abuse or dependence in the last five years. * Weight \>120 Kg (264.6 lbs.). * Known history or presence of clinically significant, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, metabolic (other than diabetes mellitus), neurologic, pulmonary, endocrine, psychiatric, neoplastic disorder or nephrotic syndrome. * History or presence of any disease or condition known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of drugs including bile salt metabolites (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), previous intestinal (ileal or colonic) operation, chronic pancreatitis, celiac disease or previous vagotomy. * Weight loss of more than 5% within 6 months prior to enrolment. * History of bariatric surgery. * Uncontrolled blood pressure BP ≥150/≥95. * Non-type 2 DM (type 1, endocrinopathy, genetic syndromes etc.). * Patients with HIV. * Daily alcohol intake \>20 g/day (2 units/day) for women and \>30 g/day (3 units/day) for men. * Treatment with anti-diabetic medications other than at least one and no more than three of the following: metformin, sulfonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitors, oral GLP-1 receptor agons metformin and more than two of the following medications sulfonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitors, oral GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide), SGLT-2 inhibitors, or TZDs. * Fibrates and statins not provided on a stable dose in the last 6 months. * Patients who are treated with valproic acid, Tamoxifen, methotrexate, amiodarone. * Chronic treatment with antibiotics (e.g. Rifaximin). * Homeopathic and/or Alternative treatments. Any treatment must be stopped before the screening period. * Uncontrolled hypothyroidism defined as Thyroid Stimulating Hormone \>2X the upper limit of normal (ULN). Thyroid dysfunction controlled for at least 6 months prior to screening is permitted. * Patients with renal dysfunction: eGFR\< 40 ml/min. * Unexplained serum creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) \>3X the upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with a reason for CPK elevation may have the measurement repeated prior to enrolment; a CPK retest \> 3X ULN leads to exclusion. * Subjects meeting criteria for contraindication for MRI - including the following: * History of severe claustrophobia impacting ability to perform MRI during the study, even despite mild sedation/treatment with as anxiolytic. * Subjects with metal implants, devices, paramagnetic objects contained within the body and excessive or metal-containing tattoos. * Subjects unable to lie still within the environment of the MRI scanner or maintain a breath-hold for the required period to acquire images, even despite mild sedation/treatment with an anxiolytic. * Subject participated in a clinical research study involving a new chemical entity within 4 weeks of study entry. * Known allergy to soy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events.Week -6 through Week 12 inclusiveThe safety of Oral Insulin will be measured by the number of treatment-related adverse events according to CTCAE version 5.0 A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be appropriately analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Screening in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction (MR PDFF)Week -6 (screening) and Week 12The change in liver fat content measured by MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction from week -6 to week 12 MR PDFF is expressed as a fat percentage in the liver. Change in MR PDFF = MR PDFF (week 12) - MR PDFF( Screening) A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be appropriately analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.
Change From Screening in Liver Fibrosis (Elasticity)Week -6 (Screening) and Week 12Change from screening in Mean Transient Elasticity (Fibrosis) measured in kPA (kilo Pascal). A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be appropriately analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.
Change From Screening in Liver SteatosisWeek -6 and Week 12Change in liver steatosis as measured by FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) in units of dB/meter. Mean fibrosis score (severity scale of liver fibrosis) measured at screening (week -6) and week 12. Fibrosis Score CAP measures the steatosis (fatty change) in the liver. The CAP score is measured in decibels per meter (dB/m). It ranges from 100 to 400 dB/m, with higher values indicating more fatty change. A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be properly analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled from three medical centers in Belgium. Patient Screening start: 05 January 2021 Last Patient Last Visit: 01 July 2022

Pre-assignment details

Recruitment of this study was hampered due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ORMD-0801 QD
16 mg QD, daily, in the morning (two capsules of ORMD--801, 8 mg each ORMD-0801 QD: 16 mg, QD, two capsules, 8 mg each.
7
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicORMD-0801 QD
Age, Continuous59.1428 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5372
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Fibrosis Score7.3428 kPa
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0014
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events.

The safety of Oral Insulin will be measured by the number of treatment-related adverse events according to CTCAE version 5.0 A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be appropriately analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.

Time frame: Week -6 through Week 12 inclusive

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ORMD-0801 QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events.3 Participants
Secondary

Change From Screening in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction (MR PDFF)

The change in liver fat content measured by MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction from week -6 to week 12 MR PDFF is expressed as a fat percentage in the liver. Change in MR PDFF = MR PDFF (week 12) - MR PDFF( Screening) A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be appropriately analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.

Time frame: Week -6 (screening) and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction (MR PDFF)Mean Week 12 MR PDFF19.560 percentage of fatStandard Deviation 10.026
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction (MR PDFF)Mean Screening MR PDFF19.233 percentage of fatStandard Deviation 7.956
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction (MR PDFF)Change from Screening in MR PDFF0.3271 percentage of fatStandard Deviation 9.0502
Secondary

Change From Screening in Liver Fibrosis (Elasticity)

Change from screening in Mean Transient Elasticity (Fibrosis) measured in kPA (kilo Pascal). A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be appropriately analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.

Time frame: Week -6 (Screening) and Week 12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver Fibrosis (Elasticity)Week -6 Fibroscan Elasticity7.714 kiloPascals (kPa)Standard Deviation 1.721
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver Fibrosis (Elasticity)Week 12 Fibroscan Fibrosis (Elasticity)7.057 kiloPascals (kPa)Standard Deviation 1.651
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver Fibrosis (Elasticity)Mean Change between week -6 and week 12 Fibroscan Fibrosis (Elasticity)-0.6571 kiloPascals (kPa)Standard Deviation 1.7696
Secondary

Change From Screening in Liver Steatosis

Change in liver steatosis as measured by FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) in units of dB/meter. Mean fibrosis score (severity scale of liver fibrosis) measured at screening (week -6) and week 12. Fibrosis Score CAP measures the steatosis (fatty change) in the liver. The CAP score is measured in decibels per meter (dB/m). It ranges from 100 to 400 dB/m, with higher values indicating more fatty change. A biostatistician reviewed the study data and determined that it is of poor quality and cannot be properly analyzed. Conclusions about this study cannot be made based on the study data.

Time frame: Week -6 and Week 12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver SteatosisScreening Fibroscan CAP (Steatosis)317.714 dB/MStandard Deviation 38.604
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver SteatosisChange from Screening in Fibroscan CAP10.7129 dB/MStandard Deviation 36.5896
ORMD-0801 QDChange From Screening in Liver SteatosisWeek 12 Fibroscan CAP (steatosis)328.429 dB/MStandard Deviation 34.457

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026