Skip to content

Green Tea Mouthwash on the Oral Health Status in Oral Cancer Patients

Effectiveness of Green Tea Mouthwash on the Oral Health Status in Oral Cancer Patients: A Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial and a CONSORT-compliant Article

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04615780
Enrollment
61
Registered
2020-11-04
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2020-06-01
Last updated
2020-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Cancer

Brief summary

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of green tea mouthwash on the oral health status (OHS) in oral cancer patients undergoing anticancer treatment. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: mouthwash with green tea (intervention) group or tap water (control) group. The intervention group rinsed the mouth with 100 ml green tea solution for 60 seconds at least twice daily, and the control group rinsed the mouth with 100 ml tap water for 60 seconds at least twice daily. The primary outcome was OHS, which was evaluated according to the Oral Assessment Guide and measured at seven time points by the same researcher. Time 0 (T0) corresponded to baseline, and Time 1-6 (T1-T6) corresponded to monthly outpatient follow-ups until six months.

Interventions

OTHERmouthwash with green tea

All patients received instructions for using the Bass brushing method to brush their teeth with a soft small-headed toothbrush. The intervention group rinsed the mouth with 100 ml green tea solution for 60 seconds at least twice daily. For the preparation of the green tea mouthwash, green tea solution was made with 5 g (1 teaspoon) of green tea powder dissolved in 100 ml water to produce 5% green tea mouthwash, as described in a previous study (Eshghpour, et al., 2013). The green tea powder was ground from Camelia sinensis leaves and regularly provided by the researcher. The green tea solution is made for a single use and remade before rinsing each time. When patients return to the outpatient monthly, the researcher first confirms patients' compliance, then assists with solving difficulties and gives encouragement.

OTHERmouthwash with tap water group

All patients received instructions for using the Bass brushing method to brush their teeth with a soft small-headed toothbrush. The control group rinsed the mouth with 100 ml tap water for 60 seconds at least twice daily.

Sponsors

Chiayi Christian Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Because of the nature of the intervention, only the data analyst was blinded to the meaning of the group assignment code.

Intervention model description

Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: mouthwash with green tea (intervention) group or tap water (control) group. The intervention group rinsed the mouth with 100 ml green tea solution for 60 seconds at least twice daily, and the control group rinsed the mouth with 100 ml tap water for 60 seconds at least twice daily.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients who were \> 20 years * newly diagnosed with oral cancer by a physician * just received oral surgery and follow-up with or without chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* patients with mental illness * an acute and a severe illness status * no teeth in the whole mouth * the ability of mouth opening less than 1 cm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
oral health status (OHS)Time 0 (T0) corresponded to baselinePatients' oral health status (OHS) was assessed according to the Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) by the same researcher. The OAG consists of eight items: voice, swallow, lips, tongue, saliva, mucous membranes, gingiva and teeth or dentures. Each item is rated by a grading of 1 (normal) to 3 (severe). Sum scores between 8-24 points and a higher score indicate poorer OHS.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026