Ankle Fractures
Conditions
Keywords
ankle fractures, surgical treatment, conservative treatment, weight-bearing
Brief summary
Weight-bearing radiographs will be used to evaluate the stability of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures. Patients with stable fractures will be randomised to operative or non-operative treatment.
Detailed description
Suprasyndesmotic fractures (Weber type C) are historically treated operatively because of the assumption that the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is ruptured, leading to joint instability (Lauge-Hansen 1950, Boden 1989). However, the medial deltoid ligament may function as the main stabiliser of the ankle joint by preventing external rotation of the talus and therefore maintains the dynamic congruity (Michelson 2007). Due to the stabilising effect of the deltoid ligament, an increasing number of transsyndesmotic fractures (Weber type B) are treated non-operatively with excellent results and without the burden of complications that accompany surgery (Gougoulias 2017, Mittal 2017, Bauer 1985). The aims of the present study are to test the stability of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures on weight-bearing radiographs and to evaluate the effect of non-operative versus operative treatment of stable suprasyndesmotic fractures. The patients will have a weight-bearing (at least 50% of body weight) standing radiograph for the evaluation of the stability of the fracture. Patients with a congruent ankle mortise (i.e., stable fracture) on weight-bearing radiographs will be randomised to either operative (ORIF, reference treatment) or non-operative treatment (cast). Patients in both groups are allowed full weight-bearing. Patients with an incongruent ankle mortise (i.e., unstable fracture) will be treated operatively according to current clinical practice and included in a parallel observational cohort study. Patients who are unwilling to participate in the intervention study are also invited to participate in the observational cohort study.
Interventions
PROCEDURESurgical treatment
Surgical treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures
DEVICEAnkle orthosis
Non-surgical treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures
Sponsors
Oslo University Hospital
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Data will be plotted into a database by an independent blinded data manager.
Intervention model description
Randomised controlled multicentre trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* patients who present with a closed, isolated fibular fracture classified as suprasyndesmotic (Weber C) with a medial clear space of less than 7 mm in mortise view on primary radiographs. * presentation less than 14 days after the injury.
Exclusion criteria
* previous fractures or ligamentous injury to the injured ankle. * pathological fracture. * diabetic neuropathy or other neuropathies. * drug abuse. * inability to consent and/or comply. * inability to understand Norwegian language. * inability to walk unaided prior to the fracture. * patients with a concomitant tibial fracture requiring surgical treatment are excluded, but patients with undisplaced concomitant tibial fractures can be included. * patients from outside the catchment area of the recruiting hospitals. However, they can be included if they are willing to undergo follow-up visits at one of the recruiting hospitals.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) | The main statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be based on the two-year follow-up. | The primary outcome measure is the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), which is a condition-specific, patient-reported measure of ankle-fracture symptoms. OMAS ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes and fewer symptoms. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) | The main statistical analysis of the outcome will be based on the two-year follow-up. | Ankle-related symptoms are, in addition to the OMAS questionnaire, measured by the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ). The MOxFQ is a 16-item questionnaire consisting of three subscales: walking/standing (w/s) problems (seven items), pain (p) (five items), and issues related to social interaction (si) (four items). Patients score each question on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 4 representing the worst stage. Raw scores are converted to a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 100, with 100 denoting the most severe symptoms. |
| EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) | The main statistical analysis of the outcome will be based on the two-year follow-up. | Quality of life is measured by the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D). EQ-5D is a validated generic health-related quality-of-life instrument. It consists of two parts: EQ-5D descriptive part and EQ-5D visual analogue scale. The descriptive part in-cludes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxie-ty/depression), each with three possible answers (no problems, some problems, and major problems). EQ-5D VAS is a visual analogue scale of self-related overall health, ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). |
| Ankle pain | The main statistical analysis of the outcome will be based on the two-year follow-up. | Ankle pain is measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), which is an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). |
| Range of motion | The main statistical analysis of the outcome will be based on the two-year follow-up. | Range of motion of both ankles will be assessed by a physiotherapist or surgeon (who are not directly involved in the study) using a goniometer to measure active loaded dorsiflexion. |
| Adverse events | The main statistical analysis of the outcome will be based on the two-year follow-up. | Adverse events, including deep vein thrombosis, nerve injury, wound infection and other complications occurring during the 24 months of follow-up are registered. Reoperations and crossover from non-operative to operative treatment are also registered. |
| Radiographic results | The main statistical analysis of the outcome will be based on the two-year follow-up. | Radiographic results (fracture healing, joint congruency, syndesmotic reduction and post-traumatic arthritis) is assessed by plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT). Post-traumatic arthritis is graded on radiographs according to van Dijk et.al. |
Countries
Norway
Outcome results
None listed