Skip to content

ECV - Epihunter Clinical Validation

ECV - Epihunter Clinical Validation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04615442
Acronym
ECV
Enrollment
102
Registered
2020-11-04
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Absence Epilepsy, Absence Seizures

Brief summary

The goal of this prospective study is to validate a wearable EEG seizure detection solution compared to video EEG. Subjects that undergo a clinical video EEG are asked to additionally wear a wearable EEG headband for up to 2 periods of 4h during the video EEG.

Interventions

DEVICEEpihunter

Subjects wear epihunter during routine video EEG

Sponsors

Filadelfia Epilepsy Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Institute of Neurology and Neuropsychology, Tbilisi, Georgia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Epihunter NV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects should have an indication of having absence seizures * Subjects should be admitted for video EEG monitoring as part of their clinical practice * Age \> 4 years

Exclusion criteria

* Head circumference should be compatible for wearable EEG device (40-70cm) * The subject should be able to understand instructions and refrain from removing the device from its head

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity for electrographic seizures of study device compared to video EEG9 monthsThe sensitivity for electrographic seizures by the study device compared to manually annotated electrographic seizures on non-video EEG is \> 0.90 (median sensitivity per patient)
Number of false alarms by study device per hour9 monthsThe number of false alarms by the study device \< 0.1 per hour (median false detection rate per recording)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility testing of automated behavioral testing triggered by automated detection3 monthsAssess if automated behavioral testing triggered by automated detection can be used to automatically assess awareness during an absence seizure. Successful if subjects DO NOT react to the testing during an unaware seizure, and DO react during an aware seizure.

Countries

Belgium, Denmark, Georgia, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026