Skip to content

Initiation of Acid Suppression Therapy Prospective Outcomes for Laryngomalacia

Initiation of Acid Suppression Therapy Prospective Outcomes for Laryngomalacia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04614974
Enrollment
65
Registered
2020-11-04
Start date
2020-11-18
Completion date
2024-05-17
Last updated
2025-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastro Esophageal Reflux, Laryngomalacia

Keywords

Laryngomalacia, Symptom improvement, Famotidine, Speech Language Therapy

Brief summary

Laryngomalacia (LM) is the most common cause of stridor in infants. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are often seen in the setting of LM; therefore, acid suppression therapy (AST) has been empirically used in the management of this disorder. The investigators recently performed a retrospective chart review assessing improvement of airway and dysphagia symptoms, weight gain, and need for surgery with AST. It was found that there was a similar improvement between LM severity groups and most patients received AST (96.6%). It is unclear if these improvements are due to AST or natural resolution of the disease. With heightened concerns of side effects related to AST in infants, particularly among those born prematurely, judicious use of these medications is needed. The investigators are now performing a prospective study looking at the outcome differences in patients with laryngomalacia who are evaluated by speech language therapy (SLP) alone versus those with SLP evaluation and acid suppression therapy (famotidine).

Detailed description

Purpose: To determine the outcome differences in patients 6 months and younger with laryngomalacia and dysphagia who are evaluated by speech language therapy (SLP) alone versus those with both SLP evaluation and acid suppression therapy (AST) (famotidine) Hypothesis: There will be no differences in outcomes between those that had SLP alone versus those that had both SLP and AST. Laryngomalacia (LM) is the most common cause of stridor in infants. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are often seen in the setting of LM; therefore, acid suppression therapy (AST) has been empirically used in the management of this disorder. However, there is no gold standard in treating mild and moderate LM patients and therefore this study will help establish guidelines for treatment. A medical chart review will be performed to assess airway and dysphagia symptom improvement from consult to the 3-month follow up appointment and then up to a year. The Pittsburgh Airway Symptom Score (PASS) questionnaire and the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) will be given to families at the consult and at the 3-month follow up appointment for caregiver assessment. The physician will then perform the standard procedures at the clinic appointment. The Flexible Laryngoscopy Findings sheet will be filled out in conjunction with the clinic procedures for objective data. The surveys will then be scored to determine true GERD (score \>=16) and severe laryngomalacia (LM) (RED questions on the PASS), which would further exclude these patients. There are 12 total questions on the I-GERQ-R. On the PASS, questions 1 & 2 are in the GREEN category and signifies mild LM, YELLOW signifies moderate LM, and RED is severe LM. On the PASS questionnaire, Yes to either #1 or #2 and nothing else is mild LM, yes to at least one #3-5 and none of #6-10 is moderate LM, and yes to any of the #6-10 indicates severe LM. There are 10 total questions on the PASS. Mild and moderate LM patients will be block randomized the day before the appointment to receive speech language therapy alone or speech language therapy with famotidine (Pepcid). Both treatments are standard of care in these patients. Speech language therapy (feeding therapy) is part of the normal clinic visit for LM patients. These patients will then be re-evaluated at their follow up appointment in 3 months (+/- 1 month). The families will take the PASS and I-GERQ-R surveys again to determine LM severity. Initially, primary outcome #2 was Dysphagia symptom score change from consult (baseline) to 3 month follow-up appointment. This is the same as the original secondary outcome measure #6 Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) score change from consult (baseline) to 3 month follow-up appointment (I-GERQ-R is the dysphagia symptom score used in this study). Therefore, these were consolidated to a single primary outcome measure Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) score change from consult (baseline) to 3 month follow-up appointment. This change was made after study and data collection completion, at the time of results reporting.

Interventions

DRUGFamotidine

Famotidine will be prescribed based on patients' weight. Caregivers will purchase this medication and dosage will be given to families in easy-to-understand language.

Speech Language Therapy (feeding therapy) will be provided by a speech language pathologist to assess feeding and swallowing.

Sponsors

Reema Padia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open Label

Intervention model description

Experimental, open-label randomized control trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Months to 6 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patients ages 0 to 6 months who do need meet the criteria at the initial appointment for supraglottoplasty * Seen in University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) Otolaryngology Department * Laryngomalacia without prolonged (\>20 seconds) cyanosis, apnea, nor failure to thrive.

Exclusion criteria

* Children over the age of 6 months old will be excluded from participation. * Premature infants (\<37 weeks gestation) * Patients with lung disease. * Laryngomalacia with prolonged (\>20 seconds) cyanosis, apnea, and failure to thrive * Sleep induced laryngomalacia * Patients with craniofacial abnormalities * Patients with a syndrome * Patients with additional airway abnormalities, seen before or at consult * Patients with symptoms that necessitate surgery * Patients with a prior cardiac surgery * Patients with AST prescribed prior to the initial otolaryngology consult.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Airway Symptom Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up Appointment3 monthsScore change from pre to post surveys on the Pittsburgh Airway Symptom Score (PASS) questionnaire. The PASS is on a scale from 0-10 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. This outcome will be assessed at the consult and the 3 month follow-up appointment.
Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up Appointment3 monthsScore change from pre to post survey on the I-GERQ-R. There are 12 questions on the surveys on a scale of 0-42. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. Those with a score of \>=16 on this survey at the initial consult are excluded from the study, indicating true gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This outcome will be assessed at the consult and the 3 month follow-up appointment.
Change in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart Review1 yearChange in prevalence of airway symptoms from consult up to 1 year assessed via electronic medical chart review. Notes from the Department of Otolaryngology will be reviewed which include reported symptoms from caregivers and symptoms seen upon exam. Airway symptoms included periods of apnea, chest wall retractions, cyanosis, stridor, noisy breathing, and increased respiratory rate.
Change in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart1 yearChange in prevalence of dysphagia symptoms from consult up to 1 year assessed via electronic medical chart review. Notes from the Department of Otolaryngology will be reviewed which include reported symptoms from caregivers and symptoms seen upon exam. Dysphagia symptoms included choking, coughing, gagging with feeds and/or emesis after feeds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weight (kg/Month) From Consult up to 1 Year1 yearWeight change in kilograms per month assessed from medical chart review from consult up to 1 year
Number of Participants With the Need for Supraglottoplasty Surgery (Escalation of Treatment) up to 1 Year1 yearThe need for escalation of treatment with supraglottoplasty surgery will be assessed through medical chart review up to 1 year.
Number of Participants With the Need for Acid Suppression Therapy Medication (Famotidine) From Speech Language Therapy Alone Group From the Day After the Consult up to 1 Year1 yearThe speech language therapy alone group will be assessed for the need for a prescription for acid suppression therapy (famotidine) from the day after the consult up to 1 year.
Number of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the ConsultAt initial consultAll patients will be scoped with a flexible laryngoscopy at the initial consult and the type of laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) will be noted. Participants are reported for each type of laryngomalacia noted at the initial consent. Participants can have more than one type of laryngomalacia. Type 1 is characterized by anterior/medial collapse of supra-arytenoid mucosa. Type 2 is characterized by short aryepiglottic folds. Type 3 is characterized by posterior collapse of epiglottis. None are considered better/worse outcomes.
Number of Participants With the Need for a Different Acid Suppression Therapy Medication (Other Than Famotidine) From the Day After the Consult up to the 3 Month Follow up Appointment3 monthsBoth groups will be assessed for the need for a different acid suppression therapy medication (other than famotidine) from the day after the consult up to the 3 month follow up appointment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Only infant patients were considered enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Speech Language Therapy Alone
Patients in this group will receive a routine swallowing evaluation by a speech language pathologist. Patient caregivers will fill out the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) and the Pittsburgh Airway Symptom Score (PASS) the day of the appointment and at the 3-month follow up appointment.
34
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression Therapy
Patients in this group will receive a routine swallowing evaluation by a speech language pathologist and famotidine (acid suppression therapy). Patient caregivers will fill out the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) and the Pittsburgh Airway Symptom Score (PASS) the day of the appointment and at the 3-month follow up appointment.
31
Total65

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1411

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSpeech Language Therapy AloneSpeech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous2.3 Months2.3 Months2.3 Months
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants29 Participants60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants24 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants14 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants17 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 340 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 348 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 343 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Airway Symptom Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up Appointment

Score change from pre to post surveys on the Pittsburgh Airway Symptom Score (PASS) questionnaire. The PASS is on a scale from 0-10 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. This outcome will be assessed at the consult and the 3 month follow-up appointment.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Follow-up PASS was completed by 20/34 (59%) in the speech language therapy alone group and 20/31 (65%) of the speech language therapy and acid suppression therapy group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Speech Language Therapy AloneAirway Symptom Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentBaseline3 score on a scale
Speech Language Therapy AloneAirway Symptom Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentChange from baseline to 3 months-2 score on a scale
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyAirway Symptom Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentBaseline3 score on a scale
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyAirway Symptom Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentChange from baseline to 3 months-1 score on a scale
p-value: 0.3Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart Review

Change in prevalence of airway symptoms from consult up to 1 year assessed via electronic medical chart review. Notes from the Department of Otolaryngology will be reviewed which include reported symptoms from caregivers and symptoms seen upon exam. Airway symptoms included periods of apnea, chest wall retractions, cyanosis, stridor, noisy breathing, and increased respiratory rate.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: 15 participants in the speech language therapy alone group and 21 participants in the speech language therapy and acid suppression therapy group had a follow-up otolaryngology clinic visit within 1 year of initial consult.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom present at consult and follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom absent at consult and follow-up12 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom absent at consult and follow-up14 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom present at consult and follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom absent at consult and follow-up15 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom absent at consult and follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up5 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom present at consult and follow-up8 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom present at consult and follow-up11 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom absent at consult and follow-up15 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom absent at consult and follow-up20 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom absent at consult and follow-up4 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up7 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewApneaSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom absent at consult and follow-up19 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom present at consult and follow-up9 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewStridorSymptom present at consult and follow-up10 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewChest Wall RetractionsSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom absent at consult and follow-up21 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewIncreased respiratory rateSymptom absent at consult and follow-up21 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewNoisy BreathingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up10 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Airway Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart ReviewCyanosisSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Comparison: Noisy breathing pre/postp-value: 0.5McNemar
Comparison: Noisy breathing pre/postp-value: 0.01McNemar
Comparison: Stridor pre/postp-value: 0.2McNemar
Comparison: Stridor pre/postp-value: 0.02McNemar
Comparison: Chest wall retractions pre/postp-value: 0.5McNemar
Comparison: Chest wall retractions pre/postp-value: 1McNemar
Comparison: Apnea pre/postp-value: 1McNemar
Primary

Change in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical Chart

Change in prevalence of dysphagia symptoms from consult up to 1 year assessed via electronic medical chart review. Notes from the Department of Otolaryngology will be reviewed which include reported symptoms from caregivers and symptoms seen upon exam. Dysphagia symptoms included choking, coughing, gagging with feeds and/or emesis after feeds.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: 15 participants in the speech language therapy alone group and 21 participants in the speech language therapy and acid suppression therapy group had a follow-up otolaryngology clinic visit within 1 year of initial consult.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom absent at consult and follow-up3 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up5 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom present at consult and follow-up5 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up9 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up5 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom present at consult and follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up7 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up7 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom present at consult and follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up13 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom present at consult and follow-up0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom absent at consult and follow-up7 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up9 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up7 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up17 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up1 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up5 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartEmesisSymptom present at consult and follow-up6 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom absent at consult and follow-up11 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up5 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up3 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartGaggingSymptom present at consult, absent at follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom absent at consult, present at follow-up3 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartCoughingSymptom present at consult and follow-up2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyChange in Prevalence of Dysphagia Symptoms From Consult up to 1 Year Assessed Via Electronic Medical ChartChokingSymptom present at consult and follow-up4 Participants
Comparison: Emesis pre/postp-value: 0.5McNemar
Comparison: Emesis pre/postp-value: 0.07McNemar
Comparison: Choking pre/postp-value: 0.06McNemar
Comparison: Choking pre/postp-value: 1McNemar
Comparison: Coughing pre/postp-value: 0.02McNemar
Comparison: Coughing pre/postp-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Gagging pre/postp-value: 1McNemar
Primary

Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up Appointment

Score change from pre to post survey on the I-GERQ-R. There are 12 questions on the surveys on a scale of 0-42. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. Those with a score of \>=16 on this survey at the initial consult are excluded from the study, indicating true gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This outcome will be assessed at the consult and the 3 month follow-up appointment.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Follow-up I-GERQ-R was completed by 20/34 (59%) in the speech language therapy alone group and 20/31 (65%) of the speech language therapy and acid suppression therapy group. However, 1 participant in the speech language therapy alone group only completed questions 1-6 of the I-GERQ-R and therefore was not included in analysis of total I-GERQ-R scores.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Speech Language Therapy AloneInfant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentBaseline12 score on scale
Speech Language Therapy AloneInfant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentChange from baseline to 3 months-4 score on scale
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyInfant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentBaseline10 score on scale
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyInfant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) Score Change From Consult (Baseline) to 3 Month Follow-up AppointmentChange from baseline to 3 months-3 score on scale
p-value: 0.8Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Number of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the Consult

All patients will be scoped with a flexible laryngoscopy at the initial consult and the type of laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) will be noted. Participants are reported for each type of laryngomalacia noted at the initial consent. Participants can have more than one type of laryngomalacia. Type 1 is characterized by anterior/medial collapse of supra-arytenoid mucosa. Type 2 is characterized by short aryepiglottic folds. Type 3 is characterized by posterior collapse of epiglottis. None are considered better/worse outcomes.

Time frame: At initial consult

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Speech Language Therapy AloneNumber of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the ConsultType 1-Anterior/medial collapse of supra-arytenoid mucosa29 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneNumber of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the ConsultType 2-Short AE folds24 Participants
Speech Language Therapy AloneNumber of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the ConsultType 3- Posterior collapse of epiglottis4 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyNumber of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the ConsultType 1-Anterior/medial collapse of supra-arytenoid mucosa27 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyNumber of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the ConsultType 2-Short AE folds19 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyNumber of Participants With Each Type of Laryngomalacia (Types 1-3) Found on the Flexible Laryngoscopy Procedure at the ConsultType 3- Posterior collapse of epiglottis4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Need for Acid Suppression Therapy Medication (Famotidine) From Speech Language Therapy Alone Group From the Day After the Consult up to 1 Year

The speech language therapy alone group will be assessed for the need for a prescription for acid suppression therapy (famotidine) from the day after the consult up to 1 year.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Speech Language Therapy AloneNumber of Participants With the Need for Acid Suppression Therapy Medication (Famotidine) From Speech Language Therapy Alone Group From the Day After the Consult up to 1 Year6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Need for a Different Acid Suppression Therapy Medication (Other Than Famotidine) From the Day After the Consult up to the 3 Month Follow up Appointment

Both groups will be assessed for the need for a different acid suppression therapy medication (other than famotidine) from the day after the consult up to the 3 month follow up appointment.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Speech Language Therapy AloneNumber of Participants With the Need for a Different Acid Suppression Therapy Medication (Other Than Famotidine) From the Day After the Consult up to the 3 Month Follow up Appointment0 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyNumber of Participants With the Need for a Different Acid Suppression Therapy Medication (Other Than Famotidine) From the Day After the Consult up to the 3 Month Follow up Appointment2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Need for Supraglottoplasty Surgery (Escalation of Treatment) up to 1 Year

The need for escalation of treatment with supraglottoplasty surgery will be assessed through medical chart review up to 1 year.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Speech Language Therapy AloneNumber of Participants With the Need for Supraglottoplasty Surgery (Escalation of Treatment) up to 1 Year2 Participants
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyNumber of Participants With the Need for Supraglottoplasty Surgery (Escalation of Treatment) up to 1 Year1 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Weight (kg/Month) From Consult up to 1 Year

Weight change in kilograms per month assessed from medical chart review from consult up to 1 year

Time frame: 1 year

Population: 20 patients in the speech language therapy alone group and 27 patients in the speech therapy and acid suppression therapy group had weights available in the electronic medical record from at least 1 follow-up appointment with any specialty within 1 year.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Speech Language Therapy AloneWeight (kg/Month) From Consult up to 1 Year0.62 kg/month
Speech Language Therapy and Acid Suppression TherapyWeight (kg/Month) From Consult up to 1 Year0.56 kg/month
p-value: 0.3Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026