Skip to content

Symptom Screening Linked to Care Pathways

Symptom Screening Linked to Care Pathways for Children With Cancer: a Cluster Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04614662
Enrollment
445
Registered
2020-11-04
Start date
2021-08-02
Completion date
2023-10-25
Last updated
2025-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Cancer, Quality of Life

Keywords

Pediatric Oncology, Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial, Symptom Screening, Quality of Life

Brief summary

Most children with cancer survive because they are given intensive treatments, but unfortunately, these treatments are associated with distressing symptoms. To address this problem, we developed the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) so that children receiving cancer treatments can communicate their bothersome symptoms, and Supportive care Prioritization, Assessment and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a web-based application that links identified symptoms to supportive care guidelines for symptom management. To establish that these tools improve the lives of children newly diagnosed with cancer, we will conduct a trial that randomizes 20 pediatric cancer institutions and measures the impact of three times weekly symptom screening, symptom feedback to healthcare providers and the development of care pathways for symptom management to improve total symptom burden, fatigue and quality of life.

Detailed description

Aims 1 and 2: Among children with newly diagnosed cancer, to determine if symptom screening and feedback to healthcare providers at least three times weekly and locally-adapted symptom management care pathways, when compared to usual care: Aim 1. Improves overall self-reported symptom scores (total SSPedi score), fatigue (PROMIS-Fatigue) and cancer-specific QoL (PedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer Module) over 8 weeks Hypothesis: Symptom screening and care pathways will improve symptoms, fatigue and QoL Aim 2. Improves symptom documentation, increases provision of interventions for symptoms, and reduces emergency department visits and unplanned clinic visits and hospitalizations over 8 weeks Hypotheses: Symptom screening and care pathways will increase symptom documentation and provision of interventions for symptoms, and will reduce healthcare utilization. Aim 3: As an exploratory aim, we will evaluate key elements of the intervention related to the external validity and generalizability of the intervention effects using the RE-AIM framework. Overall Strategy This is a cluster randomized trial including 20 pediatric oncology sites. The coordinating center is The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada. Sites will be randomized to either systematic symptom screening via SPARK with provision of symptom reports to healthcare providers containing links to care pathways for symptom management (intervention) or usual care (control). Research Methods Eligibility: We will include children with cancer who: (1) are 8-18 years of age at enrollment (SSPedi is validated in this age range); (2) are English or Spanish-speaking (all PROs are validated in these languages in this age range); (3) have any newly diagnosed cancer; (4) have a plan for any chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery; and (5) enroll within 28 days after treatment initiation. Exclusion criteria will be cognitive disability (attending lower than second grade or equivalent) or visual impairment (cannot see SPARK even with corrective lens). Procedures: In this cluster randomized trial, we will randomize sites to either intervention or control groups. At both intervention and control sites, we will enroll participants within 28 days after treatment initiation. Eligible participants will be identified by site personnel and the study will be explained to them by trained research team members. Participant capacity to consent will be assessed by the clinical or research team according to institutional standards. After the study has been explained and sufficient time has been provided to ensure all questions have been answered, informed consent and assent will be obtained from participants and guardians as appropriate. For those who decline to contribute PROs, they will be given the option to only participate in a retrospective chart review to evaluate symptom documentation, intervention provision and healthcare utilization. Careful tracking of all newly diagnosed patients by site research personnel will occur to determine how many patients are approached and consented, and where possible, reasons for declining participation. For all enrolled participants who will be contributing PROs (excluding those only involved in the retrospective chart review), a personal SPARK account will be created to allow SSPedi to be completed and symptom results to be recorded. At the 10 intervention sites, site-specific symptom management care pathways will be adapted from template care pathways for each of the 15 symptoms included in SSPedi. Enrolled participants will be prompted by text or email to complete symptom screening three times weekly via SPARK with corresponding feedback sent to their healthcare providers. Symptom reports will contain links to care pathways for symptom management. Active intervention will last for eight weeks starting from the date of enrollment. At the 10 control sites, participants will complete SSPedi to obtain the primary outcome at weeks 0, 4 and 8 but the scores will not be revealed to providers and will not be linked to care pathways. Usual care will be provided to participants at control sites and thus, there will be no study-requested routine, systematic symptom screening, symptom feedback to providers, or linkage to care pathways. If sites already routinely perform systematic symptom screening or use care pathways for symptom management, these may be continued but their use will be recorded. At both intervention and control sites, demographic information including age, sex, race, ethnicity, diagnosis, cancer stage, family socioeconomic information and treatment plan will be collected at enrollment. The following PROs will be obtained by trained research staff at baseline, week 4 and week 8 for all participants: SSPedi, PROMIS Fatigue and the PedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer Module (Aim 1). We will contact participants ahead of time to coordinate the week 4 and 8 PROs so that they can be completed in person during hospitalizations or clinic visits. If unable to arrange completion of these PROs in person, we will use their contact information to complete the questionnaires by email, text or over the phone. Data from health records (Aim 2) will be abstracted for all enrolled participants. Relapse and cancer treatment received information will be collected at the end of the study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSPARK Symptom Screening Linked to Feedback to Providers

Symptom screening three times weekly via SPARK, feedback of symptoms to healthcare providers and development of care pathways for symptom management.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cluster Randomized Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 8-18 years of age at enrollment * English or Spanish-speaking * Any newly diagnosed cancer * Have a plan for any chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery * Enroll within 28 days after treatment initiation

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive disability (attending minimum second grade or equivalent) * Visual impairment (cannot see SPARK even with corrective lens)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) Total ScoreWeek 8SSPedi measures the degree to which 15 symptoms bothered the participant yesterday or today. Each symptom is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all bothered) to 4 (extremely bothered). The total score ranges from 0 to 60 where higher numbers indicate more bothersome symptoms. The total SSPedi score is reliable, valid and responsive to change in children with cancer 8-18 years of age.(1)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Clinic Visits and Hospitalizations8 weeksNumber of visits to the emergency room and unplanned clinic visits and hospitalizations will be summed over the 8 week on-study period.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Bank v2.0 - FatigueWeek 8Fatigue will be measured using PROMIS. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population. The minimum raw score for this measure is 10 and the maximum raw score is 50. The recall period is the last 7 days and a higher score equals more fatigue. It is reliable and valid in children 8-18 years of age with cancer. This was administered using CAT (Computer Adaptive Test) scoring through REDCap. With a CAT, participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank. As additional items are administered, the potential for error is reduced and confidence in the respondent's score increases. T score conversion table 'PROMIS - Fatigue 10a Pediatric' was used.
PedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModuleWeek 8This is a cancer-specific measure of quality of life. It assesses pain and hurt, nausea, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, worry, cognitive problems, perceived physical appearance and communication. The self-report 7-day recall version will be used. The minimum value on the scale is 0 and maximum value is 100. PedsQL uses reverse scoring thus a higher score indicates a better outcome. Each question uses a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 for raw scores, and 0 to 100 for scaled scores. The breakdown of items per domain is as follows: Pain and Hurt: 2 items, Nausea: 5 items, Procedural Anxiety, Treatment Anxiety, Worry, Perceived Physical Appearance and Communication: 3 items each, Cognitive Problems: 4 items. Scaled items from each subscale are averaged to create a final score, where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Documentation of SymptomsWeek 8This outcome will be obtained with a one day window before and after the week 8 patient-reported outcome assessment. The number below represents participants with instances of symptom documentation. Documentation means there was some notation in the medical record of that symptom.
Provision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Week 8The number of interventions for each symptom at each reporting period will be recorded and categorized as any intervention provided vs. no intervention provided. Interventions included in the local care pathway will be noted. This outcome will be obtained with a one day window after the week 8 patient-reported outcome assessment. Any intervention regardless of attribution was abstracted from a list of potential, previously-defined interventions for specific symptoms. For example a child life specialist visit was considered an intervention for sadness, anxiety and anger, regardless of visit reason. Interventions for symptoms are recorded regardless of whether a symptom was documented in the chart, for example, acetaminophen was considered an intervention for pain, even if there was no documentation of pain reported. The numbers listed below represent the count of participants with any interventions provided, regardless of documentation for the symptom being recorded.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Participants enrolled at intervention sites will be prompted to complete symptom screening three times weekly via SPARK with corresponding feedback and links to symptom management care pathways sent to their healthcare providers. Symptom screening using SPARK can be performed at any time and as often as desired, but screening will be prompted three times weekly for eight weeks. Each day the participant completes symptom screening and has at least one severely bothersome symptom, the primary healthcare team will receive an email summarizing the symptom report and highlighting symptoms that are a lot or extremely bothersome. Upon study activation, we will work with each of the 10 intervention sites to develop site-specific, adapted care pathways that consider relevant work flows, institutional culture and available resources. SPARK Symptom Screening Linked to Feedback to Providers: Symptom screening three times weekly via SPARK, feedback of symptoms to healthcare providers and development of care pathways for symptom management.
221
Control
At control sites, usual care will be provided, which may or may not include symptom screening, access to CPGs or care pathways. Participants will complete SSPedi to obtain the primary outcome at weeks 0, 4 and 8 but the scores will not be revealed to providers and will not be linked to care pathways.
224
Total445

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionTotalControl
Age, Customized
11-14
77 Participants162 Participants85 Participants
Age, Customized
15-18
111 Participants213 Participants102 Participants
Age, Customized
8-10
33 Participants70 Participants37 Participants
Baseline total SSPedi Score11.8 sum of the 15 SSPedi items' scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
12.7 sum of the 15 SSPedi items' scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
13.5 sum of the 15 SSPedi items' scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
85 Participants148 Participants63 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
123 Participants262 Participants139 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants35 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
13 Participants20 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants27 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
22 Participants34 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
14 Participants15 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
44 Participants85 Participants41 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
113 Participants258 Participants145 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants183 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
133 Participants262 Participants129 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2210 / 224
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2210 / 224
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2210 / 224

Outcome results

Primary

Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) Total Score

SSPedi measures the degree to which 15 symptoms bothered the participant yesterday or today. Each symptom is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all bothered) to 4 (extremely bothered). The total score ranges from 0 to 60 where higher numbers indicate more bothersome symptoms. The total SSPedi score is reliable, valid and responsive to change in children with cancer 8-18 years of age.(1)

Time frame: Week 8

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSymptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) Total Score7.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
ControlSymptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) Total Score11.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Secondary

Documentation of Symptoms

This outcome will be obtained with a one day window before and after the week 8 patient-reported outcome assessment. The number below represents participants with instances of symptom documentation. Documentation means there was some notation in the medical record of that symptom.

Time frame: Week 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsProblems with thinking or remembering things2 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsHurt or pain46 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsChanges in how your body or face look8 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsTingly or numb hands or feet15 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling scared or worried40 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsThrowing up or feeling like you may throwup62 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling tired61 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling more or less hungry than you usually do37 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling dissapointed or sad28 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsChanges in taste2 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsMouth sores8 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsConstipation15 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling cranky or angry9 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsDiarrhea3 Participants
InterventionDocumentation of SymptomsHeadache19 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsDiarrhea6 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling dissapointed or sad16 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling scared or worried26 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsProblems with thinking or remembering things3 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsChanges in how your body or face look5 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling tired43 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsMouth sores8 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsHeadache15 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsHurt or pain57 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsTingly or numb hands or feet15 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsThrowing up or feeling like you may throwup58 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling more or less hungry than you usually do22 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsChanges in taste7 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsConstipation20 Participants
ControlDocumentation of SymptomsFeeling cranky or angry7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Clinic Visits and Hospitalizations

Number of visits to the emergency room and unplanned clinic visits and hospitalizations will be summed over the 8 week on-study period.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionNumber of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Clinic Visits and Hospitalizations1.82 Unplanned Health Care EncountersStandard Deviation 2.34
ControlNumber of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Clinic Visits and Hospitalizations1.12 Unplanned Health Care EncountersStandard Deviation 1.62
Secondary

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Bank v2.0 - Fatigue

Fatigue will be measured using PROMIS. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population. The minimum raw score for this measure is 10 and the maximum raw score is 50. The recall period is the last 7 days and a higher score equals more fatigue. It is reliable and valid in children 8-18 years of age with cancer. This was administered using CAT (Computer Adaptive Test) scoring through REDCap. With a CAT, participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank. As additional items are administered, the potential for error is reduced and confidence in the respondent's score increases. T score conversion table 'PROMIS - Fatigue 10a Pediatric' was used.

Time frame: Week 8

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Bank v2.0 - Fatigue54.6 T scoreStandard Deviation 12.1
ControlPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Bank v2.0 - Fatigue53.9 T scoreStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

PedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer Module

This is a cancer-specific measure of quality of life. It assesses pain and hurt, nausea, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, worry, cognitive problems, perceived physical appearance and communication. The self-report 7-day recall version will be used. The minimum value on the scale is 0 and maximum value is 100. PedsQL uses reverse scoring thus a higher score indicates a better outcome. Each question uses a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 for raw scores, and 0 to 100 for scaled scores. The breakdown of items per domain is as follows: Pain and Hurt: 2 items, Nausea: 5 items, Procedural Anxiety, Treatment Anxiety, Worry, Perceived Physical Appearance and Communication: 3 items each, Cognitive Problems: 4 items. Scaled items from each subscale are averaged to create a final score, where a higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Week 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Pain and hurt68.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Nausea69.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Procedural anxiety62.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.1
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Treatment anxiety76.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Worry62.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Cognitive problems69.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Perceived physical appearance73.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
InterventionPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Communication73.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Communication77.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Pain and hurt69.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Worry64.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Nausea73.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Perceived physical appearance74.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Procedural anxiety66.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.3
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Cognitive problems70.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
ControlPedsQL 3.0 Acute Cancer ModulePedsQL 3.0 domain score: Treatment anxiety77.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Secondary

Provision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)

The number of interventions for each symptom at each reporting period will be recorded and categorized as any intervention provided vs. no intervention provided. Interventions included in the local care pathway will be noted. This outcome will be obtained with a one day window after the week 8 patient-reported outcome assessment. Any intervention regardless of attribution was abstracted from a list of potential, previously-defined interventions for specific symptoms. For example a child life specialist visit was considered an intervention for sadness, anxiety and anger, regardless of visit reason. Interventions for symptoms are recorded regardless of whether a symptom was documented in the chart, for example, acetaminophen was considered an intervention for pain, even if there was no documentation of pain reported. The numbers listed below represent the count of participants with any interventions provided, regardless of documentation for the symptom being recorded.

Time frame: Week 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Headache35 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling dissapointed or sad52 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Hurt or pain68 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Changes in how your body or face look0 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Tingly or numb hands or feet17 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Throwing up or feeling like you may throw up119 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling cranky or angry48 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling more or less hungry than you usually do18 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling tired12 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Changes in taste2 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling scared or worried54 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Constipation59 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Mouth sores28 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Diarrhea0 Participants
InterventionProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Problems with thinking or remembering things5 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Diarrhea1 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling dissapointed or sad82 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling scared or worried96 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling cranky or angry67 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Problems with thinking or remembering things5 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Changes in how your body or face look1 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling tired15 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Mouth sores23 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Headache42 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Hurt or pain70 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Throwing up or feeling like you may throw up134 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Feeling more or less hungry than you usually do20 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Changes in taste0 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Constipation57 Participants
ControlProvision of Interventions for Symptoms (Independent of Symptom Documentation)Tingly or numb hands or feet25 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026