Skip to content

Etrasimod Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, 52 Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04607837
Acronym
GLADIATOR UC
Enrollment
234
Registered
2020-10-29
Start date
2021-04-12
Completion date
2024-06-19
Last updated
2025-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

Ulcerative colitis, Etrasimod, APD334, UC

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether oral etrasimod is a safe and effective treatment for moderately active ulcerative colitis in adult participants.

Interventions

DRUGEtrasimod

Etrasimod 2 mg tablet by mouth, once daily up to 52 weeks of treatment

DRUGPlacebo

Etrasimod matching placebo tablet by mouth, once daily up to 52 weeks of treatment

Sponsors

Arena is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) ≥ 3 months prior to screening * Active UC confirmed by endoscopy * Moderately active UC defined as a modified Mayo score of 4 to 6 and an endoscopic score ≥ 2 and rectal bleeding score ≥ 1 * Received a surveillance colonoscopy within 12 months before baseline

Exclusion criteria

* Severe extensive colitis * Diagnosis of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis or the presence or history of a fistula consistent with Crohn's disease * Diagnosis of microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, or infectious colitis * Hospitalization for exacerbation of UC requiring intravenous steroids within 12 weeks prior to or after screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) at Week 52 Using Modified Mayo Score (MMS)Week 52MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: endoscopic score(ES),rectal bleeding(RB),stool frequency(SF).Each component score ranges from 0 to 3(0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease.ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy,scores ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3(severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]).RB reported most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in 24-hour period,scores ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3(blood alone passes).SF reported number of stools in 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in same period,scores ranged from 0(normal number of stools) to 3(5 or more stools than normal).CR per FDA draft guidance defined as:SF=0 or 1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0,ES less than or equal to (\<=)1(excluding friability).Percentage of participants achieving CR at Week 52 was evaluated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 12 Using MMSWeek 12MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]). RB reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance was defined as: SF=0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1 (excluding friability). Percentage of participants achieving CR at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52Week 52Endoscopic improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability). ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 52Week 52Symptomatic remission was defined as SF =0 (or = 1 with a \>= 1 point decrease from baseline) and RB =0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving symptomatic remission at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 52Week 52Complete symptomatic remission was defined as participants with RB = 0 and SF = 0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving complete symptomatic remission at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 52Week 52Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability) with Geboes score \<2.0. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. The Geboes score grading system was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving mucosal improvement at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Both Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined] Using MMSWeeks 12 and 52 [Combined]MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); higher scores = more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). Clinical remission per FDA draft guidance: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB =0, and ES \<=1 (excluding friability). Percentage of participants who achieved clinical remission at both the time points Week 12 and Week 52 \[Combined\] are reported.
Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMSWeek 52MMS has following components:ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3(0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES:worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease)to 3(severe disease). RB:most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen)to 3(blood alone passes). SF:number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools)to 3(5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 12-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=12 weeks immediately prior to Week 52. The baseline was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.
Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMSWeek 52MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES: worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF: number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 12-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=12 weeks immediately prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMSWeek 52MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF; each ranged as 0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe; total MMS score 0-9; higher scores=more severe disease. ES:worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease)to 3(severe disease). RB:most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3(blood alone passes). SF:number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools)to 3(5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 4-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=4 weeks immediately prior to Week 52. The baseline was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.
Percentage of Participants With 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMSWeek 52MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES: worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF: number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 4-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=4 weeks immediately prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on the Geboes Grading System at Week 12Week 12Histologic response based on the Geboes grading system was defined as Geboes score \<=3.1. The Geboes score grading system is a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving histologic response based on the Geboes grading system at week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) at Week 12Week 12RHI is an evaluative index, derived from the Geboes score, that is designed to be reproducible and responsive to clinically meaningful change in disease activity over time. Histologic response based on RHI was defined as decrease in RHI of \>=7 points from baseline. Total RHI score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 33 (severe disease activity), higher score = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving histologic response based on RHI at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12 Using MMSWeek 12Clinical response was defined as a \>=2-point and \>=30 percentage (%) decrease from baseline in MMS, and a \>=1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore \<=1 and is as per FDA draft guidance. MMS was used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]). Percentage of participants achieving clinical response at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 52 Using MMSWeek 52Clinical response was defined as a \>=2-point and \>=30 % decrease from baseline in MMS, and a \>=1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore \<=1 and is as per FDA draft guidance. MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component scores ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]). Percentage of participants achieving clinical response at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12Week 12Endoscopic improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability). ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 12Week 12Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability) with Geboes score \<2.0. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. The Geboes score grading system was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving mucosal improvement at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 12Week 12Symptomatic remission was defined as SF =0 (or = 1 with a \>= 1 point decrease from baseline) and RB =0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving symptomatic remission at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 12Week 12Complete symptomatic remission was defined as participants with RB = 0 and SF = 0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving complete symptomatic remission at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Change From Baseline in Both ES and RB or in Both ES and SF at Week 12Baseline to Week 12ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. RB: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants with reduction from baseline in both ES and RB or in both ES and SF at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint. The baseline primary analysis set was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From first dose of study treatment up to 4 weeks post last dose of study treatment (up to 56 Weeks)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.
Number of Participants With AEs Based on SeverityFrom first dose of study treatment up to 4 weeks post last dose of study treatment (up to 56 Weeks)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Severity was classified using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5.0, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death related to AE. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data for any reporting group were reported.

Countries

Australia, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 234 participants with moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC) were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etrasimod
Participants with moderately active UC were randomized to receive Etrasimod 2 mg tablet orally QD for 52-Week.
154
Placebo
Participants with moderately active UC were randomized to receive placebo matched to Etrasimod tablet orally QD for 52-Week.
79
Total233

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event82
Overall StudyDisease worsening3636
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy20
Overall StudyOther10
Overall StudyParticipant terminated by sponsor10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject87

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalEtrasimod
Age, Continuous40.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
41.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.08
41.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants219 Participants146 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
67 Participants210 Participants143 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants103 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants130 Participants91 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1540 / 79
other
Total, other adverse events
100 / 15448 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 1541 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) at Week 52 Using Modified Mayo Score (MMS)

MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: endoscopic score(ES),rectal bleeding(RB),stool frequency(SF).Each component score ranges from 0 to 3(0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease.ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy,scores ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3(severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]).RB reported most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in 24-hour period,scores ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3(blood alone passes).SF reported number of stools in 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in same period,scores ranged from 0(normal number of stools) to 3(5 or more stools than normal).CR per FDA draft guidance defined as:SF=0 or 1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0,ES less than or equal to (\<=)1(excluding friability).Percentage of participants achieving CR at Week 52 was evaluated.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) at Week 52 Using Modified Mayo Score (MMS)26.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) at Week 52 Using Modified Mayo Score (MMS)18.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common risk difference using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the risk difference being 0.p-value: 0.252495% CI: [-5.24, 19.94]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS

MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF; each ranged as 0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe; total MMS score 0-9; higher scores=more severe disease. ES:worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease)to 3(severe disease). RB:most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3(blood alone passes). SF:number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools)to 3(5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 4-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=4 weeks immediately prior to Week 52. The baseline was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who received oral corticosteroids for UC at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS30.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS30.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.927295% CI: [-38.31, 34.9]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Change From Baseline in Both ES and RB or in Both ES and SF at Week 12

ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. RB: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants with reduction from baseline in both ES and RB or in both ES and SF at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint. The baseline primary analysis set was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Change From Baseline in Both ES and RB or in Both ES and SF at Week 1244.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Change From Baseline in Both ES and RB or in Both ES and SF at Week 1221.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights, where only participants with an assessment at Baseline and the corresponding visit are included. The 2-sided Nominal p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.001195% CI: [9.17, 36.49]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Both Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined] Using MMS

MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); higher scores = more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). Clinical remission per FDA draft guidance: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB =0, and ES \<=1 (excluding friability). Percentage of participants who achieved clinical remission at both the time points Week 12 and Week 52 \[Combined\] are reported.

Time frame: Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined]

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Both Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined] Using MMS16.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Both Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined] Using MMS5.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.010495% CI: [2.63, 19.75]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 12 Using MMS

MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]). RB reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance was defined as: SF=0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1 (excluding friability). Percentage of participants achieving CR at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 12 Using MMS28.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 12 Using MMS11.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.006895% CI: [4.31, 26.91]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12 Using MMS

Clinical response was defined as a \>=2-point and \>=30 percentage (%) decrease from baseline in MMS, and a \>=1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore \<=1 and is as per FDA draft guidance. MMS was used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]). Percentage of participants achieving clinical response at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS 4-6, baseline ES \>=2 and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12 Using MMS55.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12 Using MMS36.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.015195% CI: [3.61, 33.67]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 52 Using MMS

Clinical response was defined as a \>=2-point and \>=30 % decrease from baseline in MMS, and a \>=1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore \<=1 and is as per FDA draft guidance. MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component scores ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]). Percentage of participants achieving clinical response at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS 4-6, baseline ES \>=2 and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 52 Using MMS44.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 52 Using MMS38.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.441995% CI: [-9.22, 21.13]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 12

Complete symptomatic remission was defined as participants with RB = 0 and SF = 0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving complete symptomatic remission at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 1220.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 1220.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights, where only participants with an assessment at Baseline and the corresponding visit are included. The 2-sided Nominal p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.977495% CI: [-12.18, 12.53]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 52

Complete symptomatic remission was defined as participants with RB = 0 and SF = 0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving complete symptomatic remission at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 5220.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 5220.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights, where only participants with an assessment at Baseline and the corresponding visit are included. The 2-sided Nominal p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.914195% CI: [-11.76, 13.13]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12

Endoscopic improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability). ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 1244.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 1220.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.000795% CI: [9.78, 36.89]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52

Endoscopic improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability). ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 5232.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 5223.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.230295% CI: [-5.22, 21.71]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 12

Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability) with Geboes score \<2.0. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. The Geboes score grading system was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving mucosal improvement at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 1229.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 1213.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.012895% CI: [3.19, 26.79]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 52

Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement was defined as ES \<=1 (excluding friability) with Geboes score \<2.0. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), higher scores = more severity. The Geboes score grading system was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving mucosal improvement at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 5225.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 5215.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.108995% CI: [-2.13, 21.25]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) at Week 12

RHI is an evaluative index, derived from the Geboes score, that is designed to be reproducible and responsive to clinically meaningful change in disease activity over time. Histologic response based on RHI was defined as decrease in RHI of \>=7 points from baseline. Total RHI score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 33 (severe disease activity), higher score = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving histologic response based on RHI at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) at Week 1246.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) at Week 1235.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights, where only participants with an assessment at Baseline and the corresponding visit are included. The 2-sided Nominal p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.182395% CI: [-4.73, 24.87]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on the Geboes Grading System at Week 12

Histologic response based on the Geboes grading system was defined as Geboes score \<=3.1. The Geboes score grading system is a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving histologic response based on the Geboes grading system at week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on the Geboes Grading System at Week 1244.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on the Geboes Grading System at Week 1233.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights, where only participants with an assessment at Baseline and the corresponding visit are included. The 2-sided Nominal p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.151395% CI: [-3.95, 25.56]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 12

Symptomatic remission was defined as SF =0 (or = 1 with a \>= 1 point decrease from baseline) and RB =0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving symptomatic remission at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 1236.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 1225.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights, where only participants with an assessment at Baseline and the corresponding visit are included. The 2-sided Nominal p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.149295% CI: [-3.67, 24.14]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 52

Symptomatic remission was defined as SF =0 (or = 1 with a \>= 1 point decrease from baseline) and RB =0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving symptomatic remission at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 5237.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 5230.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights, where only participants with an assessment at Baseline and the corresponding visit are included. The 2-sided Nominal p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.333995% CI: [-7.32, 21.55]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS

MMS has following components:ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3(0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES:worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease)to 3(severe disease). RB:most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen)to 3(blood alone passes). SF:number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools)to 3(5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 12-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=12 weeks immediately prior to Week 52. The baseline was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who received oral corticosteroids for UC at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS16.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS16.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.920395% CI: [-22.06, 19.92]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS

MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES: worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF: number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 12-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=12 weeks immediately prior to Week 52.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS25.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS16.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.172695% CI: [-3.71, 20.68]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS

MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES: worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF: number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES \<=1(excluding friability). 4-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for \>=4 weeks immediately prior to Week 52.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Primary analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with baseline MMS \[total score range: 0 to 9, higher score = more severity\] 4-6, baseline ES greater than or equal to (\>=2) and baseline RB score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtrasimodPercentage of Participants With 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS25.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS16.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference (%) for etrasimod minus placebo was based on estimated common RD using the Mantel- Haenszel weights. The 2-sided p-value was used to test the hypothesis of the RD being 0.p-value: 0.172695% CI: [-3.71, 20.68]Mantel Haenszel
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 4 weeks post last dose of study treatment (up to 56 Weeks)

Population: Safety set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EtrasimodNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)101 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)49 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With AEs Based on Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Severity was classified using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5.0, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death related to AE. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data for any reporting group were reported.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 4 weeks post last dose of study treatment (up to 56 Weeks)

Population: Safety set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EtrasimodNumber of Participants With AEs Based on SeverityGrade 148 Participants
EtrasimodNumber of Participants With AEs Based on SeverityGrade 242 Participants
EtrasimodNumber of Participants With AEs Based on SeverityGrade 311 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Based on SeverityGrade 123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Based on SeverityGrade 224 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Based on SeverityGrade 32 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026