Skip to content

Comparative Study of MCCE With/Without Tether vs Conventional Upper Endoscopy in Patients With Upper Abdominal Symptoms

A Prospective Single Blinded, Pilot Study, Comparing a Magnetically Controlled Capsule With or Without a Tether (MCC or MCC-T) With Conventional Upper Endoscopy for the Diagnosis of Patients With Upper Abdominal Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04605302
Enrollment
27
Registered
2020-10-28
Start date
2021-02-10
Completion date
2023-03-30
Last updated
2023-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms

Brief summary

A prospective single blinded, tandem study, comparing a magnetically controlled capsule with or without a tether (MCC or MCC-T) with conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of patients with upper abdominal symptoms.

Detailed description

In the US patients commonly undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for upper abdominal symptoms to try to resolve whether they have gastroesophageal reflux disease or functional dyspepsia, if they are older than the age of 60 with symptoms, or have alarm symptoms such as unexplained weight loss, persistent nausea and vomiting or if they have symptoms that are refractory to acid suppression therapy. Given the increasing burden of digestive disease in the US, the use of EGD is increasing in volume nationwide. EGD usually requires either conscious sedation or monitored anesthesia sedation, which has put an additional cost burden on the healthcare system. Since MCC or MCC-T does not require sedation, it offers an attractive option for both patients and clinicians alike. The aim of this study is to compare in the same patient the accuracy of the MCC and MCC-T and EGD in patients presenting with upper abdominal symptoms.

Interventions

DEVICEMCC/MCC-T

Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCC), with or without tether, is used to visualize the upper gastrointestinal tract

Diagnostic endoscopic procedure that visualizes the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract down to the duodenum

Sponsors

AnX Robotica Corp.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Patient blinded to MCC results. EGD assessor blinded to MCC results.

Intervention model description

Tandem study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is able to provide informed consent 2. Patient has appropriate indications for EGD including symptoms of, but not limited to upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, heartburn, iron deficiency anemia, weight loss, bloating, belching, nausea, vomiting and atypical chest pain.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient with dysphagia. 2. Patient with previous intestinal surgery. 3. Patient with Crohn's disease or other potential obstructive conditions, unless there is a recent CTE, MRE or patency capsule performed to exclude an obstructive lesion that may retain the capsule. 4. Female patient who is pregnant. 5. Patient with implanted medical device that would be potentially affected by magnets or radiofrequency emissions (e.g., pacemakers, implanted cardiac defibrillators).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of lesions2 daysNumber of lesions found by MCC/MCC-T versus EGD
Number of adverse events2 daysOccurrence and severity of adverse event related to MCC/MCC-T procedure versus EGD procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction score2 daysPatient acceptance of MCC/MCC-T versus EGD (scale of 1 to 10 when 1 is the lowest and 10 is the highest score)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026