Skip to content

Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation Effect in Chronic Piriformis Syndrome.

Effects of Thrust Joint Manipulation of Sacroiliac Joint in Chronic Piriformis Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04603703
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-10-27
Start date
2020-05-09
Completion date
2020-09-18
Last updated
2020-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Piriformis Syndrome

Keywords

High Velocity Low Amplitude Thrust, Piriformis Syndrome, Sacroiliac joint manipulation

Brief summary

The objective of the study was to determine the effects of sacroiliac joint thrust manipulation on pain, pain pressure threshold, piriformis length and straight leg raise, in chronic piriformis syndrome.

Detailed description

In 2017, a systematic review was conducted to measure the effectiveness of physical therapy approach for relieving the SIJ pain linked with PS. Participants were administered with conservative physical therapy, Kinesiology taping and sacroiliac joint manipulation in group A, group B and group C respectively. They have concluded that Sacroiliac joint manipulation was more effective as compare to the rest of the physiotherapy approach in lowering the SIJ pain associated with piriformis syndrome. In 2014, an experimental study was conducted to compare the effects of nerve mobilization technique with conventional physical therapy approach. Pre and post treatment data was taken from the respective participants. The results of this study concluded that there is a significant differences in the outcome measures of both groups and nerve MOBS were proven to be more effective in relieving the sciatic nerve radiating pain associated with inflamed piriformis muscle in PS. A study in July, 2012 was conducted to compare the effects of two possible physical therapy treatments in lowering the low back pain threshold associated with piriformis syndrome. These two techniques were METs and SCS. Their results concluded that both Muscle energy technique and Strain counter strain were proved to be equally effective in the management of functional disability and pain in low back associated with chronic PS. An RCT was conducted in 2011, to measure the effectiveness of two possible manipulation methods which can be applied in patients with chronic piriformis syndrome. According to this study, manipulating the of SIJ along with lumber manipulation is more effective as compare to the SIJ manipulation alone to regain the total piriformis length for patients with Chronic PS. Another study was conducted by Gopal Nambi and colleagues in Saudi Arabia. It was concluded that Program comprises of Post Isometric Relaxation is more effective as compare to conservative physical therapy in alleviating the pain, improving hip ROM and functional improvement in participants with PS.

Interventions

Ultrasound for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Moist hot pack for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Piriformis stretching for 7 sec hold/ 7 repititions/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Myofascial release of lumbosacral paraspinal muscles for 3 mins/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Gluteal muscles strengthening for 10 sec hold/ 5 reps/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Sciatic Neurodynamics with 10 oscillations/ 3 sets/(3 days/ week), HVLAT manipulation/ 1 rep/ 1set/ (3 days/ week), A total of 2 weeks (6 sessions, 3 sessions/ week) were given each consisting of 30 mins.

OTHERConventional Physical Therapy

Ultrasound for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Moist hot pack for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Piriformis stretching for 7 sec hold/ 7 repititions/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Myofascial release of lumbosacral paraspinal muscles for 3 mins/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Gluteal muscles strengthening for 10 sec hold/ 5 reps/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Sciatic Neurodynamics with 10 oscillations/ 3 sets/(3 days/ week), A total of 2 weeks (6 sessions, 3 sessions/ week) were given each consisting of 30 mins.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants did not know which treatment techniques are given in the specified groups.

Intervention model description

Both groups were treated simultaneously with their specified treatment techniques within given duration.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients having alteast 3 months chronic Piriformis syndrome * FAIR test positive * Unilateral or bilateral Piriformis Syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* Lumber Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc (PIVD) * Patients having hip osteoarthritis * Sacroiliatis (FABER test, Mennell's test, Sacral Thrust Test, Compression test, Distraction test, thigh thrust test) * Lumbosacral instability * Patients having any joint replacement in lumbosacral and hip regions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)6th DayChanges from baseline, Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a scale for pain starting from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure Pain Threshold6th DayChanges from baseline, pressure pain Threshold were taken with the help of Algometer.
Piriformis Length6th DayChanges from the baseline, Piriformis Length were taken with the help of Goniometer.
Straight Leg Raise6th DayChanges from baseline, Straight Leg Raise were taken with the help of Inclinometer.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026