Skip to content

Postural Management for Hip Luxation in Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy

Postural Management to Prevent Hip Luxation in Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy Children: Comparing Two Approaches in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04603625
Acronym
CPluxprev2020
Enrollment
17
Registered
2020-10-27
Start date
2020-10-29
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

hip luxation

Brief summary

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common motor disability in childhood. Among these, hip luxation represents the most frequent and clinically relevant one, affecting 72% of non-ambulatory CP children. Reconstructive surgical treatment is debated in severe CP children, for whom it is crucial to identify an effective preventive approach. The aim of our study is to verify if keeping a sitting position centering femoral heads is more effective than usual postural management (sitting with the trunk aligned and hips abducted), in preventing hip luxation in quadriplegic CP children. It's a multicenter randomized controlled study (13 sites involved). A total of 102 quadriplegic CP children, aged 1-6 years-old, classified as Gross Motor Function Measure System 4 or 5, will be recruited and randomized to usual or experimental sitting, at least 5 hours a day, for 2 years. The primary outcome will be the degree of luxation, measured by means of the Migration Percentage (MP), on pelvic radiography, at 12 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes will include compliance and Health Related-Quality of Life, using validated tools, hip pain, device cost, MRI lesions, concurrent direct neuromotor treatment, use of standing devices and spasticity treatments (botulinum toxin, per os or intrathecal baclofen, selective dorsal rhizotomy). Experimental sitting is expected to reduce the MP change compared to usual care. It will be of interest to compare compliance, QoL and costs in either groups: aspects affecting the effectiveness. Furthermore to evaluate correlations between MP and spasticity treatments, MRI lesion type, and other clinical features.

Interventions

OTHERpostural management

postural management in sitting position

Sponsors

Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale IRCCS G. Gaslini di Genova
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
IRCCS Eugenio Medea
CollaboratorOTHER
IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi di Firenze
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Usl di Bologna
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda ULSS di Verona e Provincia
CollaboratorOTHER
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Physicians measuring Migration Percentage (Primary Outcome) will be blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cerebral palsy spastic or dyskinetic * GMFCS 4 or 5 * MP\<41% * Informed Consent acquired

Exclusion criteria

* muscle contracture overcoming defined passive Range Of Motion (ROM)limits * anterior hip luxation * previous reconstructive hip surgery * preventive surgery in previous 12 months * lumbar scoliosis \>20° Cobb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Migration PercentageDay 0, Month 12, Months 24measure of hip luxation on pelvic radiography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caregiver Priorities & Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD)Day 0, Month 12, Month 24Parents will fill in a questionnaire about Health Related Quality of Life referred to their child. Minimum value 0, maximum value 100, higher scores mean a better outcome.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (IT-QUEST)Month 12, Month 24Parents will fill in a questionnaire measuring their satisfaction about the assistive device ensuring the desired sitting position of their child. Minimum value 1, maximum value 5,higher scores mean a better outcome.
Incidence of painDay 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24Care givers will be interviewed about presence or absence of hip pain in the previous months during personal care and activities of daily living
Assistive devices costsDay 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24Costs paid by Health Institution for sitting systems used during the study
Percentage of patients attending Botulinum Toxin-A injectionsDay 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24Botulinum Toxin-A injections in muscles around the hip during the study will be recorded
Percentage of patients attending direct physical treatmentDay 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24Physiotherapy, other Neuromotor Therapy during the study
Percentage of patients using standing devices in abductionDay 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24It will be recorded if the patients will be using standing devices at least 5 hours/week, less than 5 h/week or never
Type of CP (Dyskinetic or spastic)Day 0Type of CP will be recorded to evaluate any association with MP change
Percentage of patients having Intrathecal Baclofen (ITB)Day 0It will be recorded if patients have ITB to evaluate any association with MP change
Percentage of patients taking Baclofen per osDay 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24Baclofen oral medication during the study will be recorded
Percentage of patients who underwent Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR)Day 0It will be recorded if patients underwent SDR in the past to evaluate any association with MP change
AgeDay 0Age will be recorded to evaluate any association with MP change
SexDay 0Sex will be recorded to evaluate any association with MP change
Type of lesion at MRIDay 0Type of lesion at MRI, according to Neonatal Neuroimaging Classification System (maldevelopments \| predominant white matter injury \| predominant grey matter injury \| miscellaneous \| Normal). Data will be registered based on previously acquired MRI, considering that the exam is mandatory for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. It will be recorded to evaluate any association with MP change

Countries

Italy

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRSILVIA FACCIOLI

Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 8, 2026