Skip to content

Self-Management Intervention: Considering Needs & Preferences of Dementia Caregivers (Caregiver Career Study)

Self-Management Interventions: Considering Needs & Preferences of Dementia Caregivers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04603482
Enrollment
328
Registered
2020-10-26
Start date
2021-01-08
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease, Bereavement, Carer Stress Syndrome, Dementia, Stress

Keywords

Caregiver, Biofeedback, Resourcefulness, Self-Management

Brief summary

How do varying levels of participation in selecting self-management interventions (ranging from no input into the selection to selection based on need or preference) affect health risks and physical and mental health over time in family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's and other dementia disorders? Caregivers will be randomized to 1) information on diversional activities (attention control); 2) self-management intervention based on need (SM-need); or 3) self-management intervention of their preference (SM-preference).

Detailed description

The study has two aims: The primary aim (A1) is to examine differences across the three groups (attention control, SM-need, and SM-preference) on caregiver health (health risks and mental and physical health) over time. The investigators hypothesize that the caregivers who receive a self-management intervention based on need (SM-need) or preference (SM-preference) will have better health outcomes than those in the attention control. Secondary aims are to: A2) explore whether caregiver baseline need or preference for intervention (i.e. choice) is associated with: a) care recipient's symptoms; b) caregiver reactions; and c) caregiving involvement, and A3) build caregiver profiles from demographic/ contextual factors that are associated with their needs and preferences for the self-management interventions. All caregivers will complete assessment measures and measures of health risks, and physical and mental health at baseline (T1), about 6 months (T2), and about 12 months (T3). Caregivers will be randomly assigned to one of three groups. The attention control group will receive information on diversional activities. The SM-need group will receive a self-management intervention for biofeedback training or resourcefulness training, as determined by baseline cut scores. Caregivers in the SM-preference group will choose one of the two self-management interventions according to their personal preference. Both self-management interventions (biofeedback training, resourcefulness training) and the diversional activities, are delivered over four weeks (between T1 and T2). Caregivers may use the intervention whenever and as often as they wish (i.e. self-tailoring) for the remainder of the study period. These resourcefulness training includes teaching self-help (stress-management, problem-solving) and help-seeking skills, respectively. Biofeedback training consists of the use of a hand-held device that shows the participant their changes in heart rate based on changes in their breathing pattern (as they relax); caregivers who need or prefer the biofeedback will be given a device to use for 28 days. All study participants receiving the intervention will also be asked to keep a journal to record their experience with the intervention.

Interventions

Resourcefulness training is a cognitive behavioral intervention that consists of teaching and reinforcing personal (self-help) and social (help-seeking) strategies to overcome adversity.

BEHAVIORALBiofeedback

Biofeedback training combines teaching slow, deep, paced breathing with real-time tracking to increase an individual's heart rate variability and ultimately improve self-regulation.

BEHAVIORALAttention Control

Participants randomly assigned to this intervention will receive suggested Diversional Activities, presented in an audiovisual format.

Sponsors

Case Western Reserve University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants were aware of which intervention they were receiving (Resourcefulness Training, HRV-focused BioFeedback, Attention Control: Diversonal Activities, but were not aware of which arm they had been randomly assigned to, or whether their intervention was an active or placebo comparator. The PI and Outcomes Assessor were blinded as to the identity of individual participants, and, during data collection, which participants had been assigned to which arm/intervention. In order to complete study aims, variables indicating arm and intervention assignment were included in the final data file.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 years old * Have a living family member or a recently deceased family member diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease or another dementia * Identify self as a primary caregiver * In-home Caregivers: must be currently providing a minimum of 4 hours per day of supervision/direct care, and have entered that role within the past twelve months; Care Partners whose family member moved into a nursing or assisted living facility within the past twelve months, and must report visiting their care recipient at least once per week; Caretakers (i.e. bereaved) whose family member is deceased within the past twelve months, and are persons with direct oversight of the deceased person's belongings, estate, finances, etc. * Be capable of performing informed consent and participating in study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Does not have a family member with Alzheimer's disease or another dementia * Has not cared for a living family member with dementia within the last 12 months, or the family member has been deceased for more than 12 months * Has knowledge of another family member in the same household enrolled in the study * Currently pregnant * Has a pacemaker * Lives outside of the study area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleFrom T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)14 items; 3-point scale; Scores range 9-27; higher score indicates greater perceived stress
Change in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistFrom T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)10 items; dichotomous list; Scores range 0-10; higher score indicates more negative emotions.
Change in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesFrom T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)8 items; 6-point scale; Scores range 0-40; higher score indicates higher depressive cognition
Change in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)Change in self-assessment of general physical health, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10 Global Health). Ten items are rated on a five-point scale, scores range from 0-20, and a higher score indicates better health and health-related quality of life.
Change in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)Change in self-assessment of general mental health, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10 Global Health). Ten items are rated on a five-point scale, scores range from 0-20, and a higher score indicates better health and health-related quality of life.
Change in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleFrom T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)Measure of Caregiving Health Risks: 9 items; 3-point scale, Scores range 9-27; higher score indicates greater risk

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Family carers of elders with dementia will be recruited using various strategies (community support organizations, publicly posted flyers, online ads) in NE Ohio. Eligible participants were adults over the age of 18, who were carers of a family member (over the age of 65) with a medical diagnosis of dementia, and had transitioned to a new phase of caring in the previous 6 months.

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled participants may be excluded if they elect not to participate after enrolling.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Need
Participants in this arm were, at enrollment, caregivers (in the home), care partners (with a care facility), or caretakers (bereaved) of persons with dementia. Those in this randomly assigned group were given a choice to participate in one of two self-management interventions (either biofeedback or resourcefulness training).
105
Preference
Participants in this arm were, at enrollment, caregivers (in the home), care partners (with a care facility), or caretakers (bereaved) of persons with dementia. Those in this randomly assigned group were given a choice to participate in one of two self-management interventions (either biofeedback or resourcefulness training).
100
Attention Control
Participants in this arm were, at enrollment, caregivers (in the home), care partners (with a care facility), or caretakers (bereaved) of persons with dementia. Those in this randomly assigned group participated in diversional activities.
103
Total308

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up151515

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeedPreferenceAttention ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
11 Participants10 Participants9 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
38 Participants38 Participants39 Participants115 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
56 Participants52 Participants55 Participants163 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
105 Participants97 Participants101 Participants303 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants12 Participants16 Participants48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
82 Participants84 Participants85 Participants251 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
105 participants100 participants103 participants308 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
91 Participants87 Participants88 Participants266 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants13 Participants15 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1050 / 1000 / 103
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1050 / 1000 / 103
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1050 / 1000 / 103

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

Change in self-assessment of general mental health, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10 Global Health). Ten items are rated on a five-point scale, scores range from 0-20, and a higher score indicates better health and health-related quality of life.

Time frame: From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)

Population: All participants who completed the T3 questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeedChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T3 (1 year post baseline)13.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
NeedChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T2 (6 months post baseline)12.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.05
NeedChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)Baseline12.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.29
PreferenceChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T2 (6 months post baseline)12.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
PreferenceChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)Baseline11.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
PreferenceChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T3 (1 year post baseline)12.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)Baseline12.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T3 (1 year post baseline)12.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver Global Health - Mental Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T2 (6 months post baseline)13.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Primary

Change in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions Scales

8 items; 6-point scale; Scores range 0-40; higher score indicates higher depressive cognition

Time frame: From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)

Population: The overall analyzed participants included all who completed the T3 questionnaire across the three arms. 15 participants in each arm discontinued their participation between baseline (T1) and T3. Thus, this number equals 308 (who completed baseline measures) minus 45 (who dropped out over time) which equals 263 at T3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeedChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesT2 (6 months post baseline)10.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.29
NeedChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesBaseline8.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
NeedChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesT3 (1 year post baseline)8.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesT2 (6 months post baseline)7.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesBaseline10.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.93
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesT3 (1 year post baseline)8.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesBaseline8.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.09
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesT3 (1 year post baseline)8.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.96
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Depressive Cognitions ScalesT2 (6 months post baseline)7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.62
Primary

Change in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior Scale

Measure of Caregiving Health Risks: 9 items; 3-point scale, Scores range 9-27; higher score indicates greater risk

Time frame: From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)

Population: The overall analyzed participants included all who completed the T3 questionnaire across the three arms. 15 participants in each arm discontinued their participation between baseline (T1) and T3. Thus, this number equals 308 (who completed baseline measures) minus 45 (who dropped out over time) which equals 263 at T3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeedChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleBaseline15.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
NeedChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleT2 (6 months post baseline)15.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
NeedChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleT3 (1 year post baseline)15.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleBaseline16.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.77
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleT2 (6 months post baseline)15.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleT3 (1 year post baseline)15.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.52
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleBaseline16.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.62
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleT2 (6 months post baseline)15.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Health Risk Behavior ScaleT3 (1 year post baseline)15.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.34
Primary

Change in Caregiver's Negative Emotions Checklist

10 items; dichotomous list; Scores range 0-10; higher score indicates more negative emotions.

Time frame: From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)

Population: The overall analyzed participants included all who completed the T3 questionnaire across the three arms. 15 participants in each arm discontinued their participation between baseline (T1) and T3. Thus, this number equals 308 (who completed baseline measures) minus 45 (who dropped out over time) which equals 263 at T3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeedChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistT2 (6 months post baseline)5.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
NeedChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistBaseline6.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
NeedChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistT3 (1 year post baseline)5.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistT2 (6 months post baseline)5.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistBaseline7.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistT3 (1 year post baseline)6.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistBaseline6.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.85
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistT3 (1 year post baseline)6.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Negative Emotions ChecklistT2 (6 months post baseline)5.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
Primary

Change in Caregiver's Perceived Stress Scale

14 items; 3-point scale; Scores range 9-27; higher score indicates greater perceived stress

Time frame: From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)

Population: The overall analyzed participants included all who completed the T3 questionnaire across the three arms. 15 participants in each arm discontinued their participation between baseline (T1) and T3. Thus, this number equals 308 (who completed baseline measures) minus 45 (who dropped out over time) which equals 263 at T3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeedChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleBaseline19.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.97
NeedChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleT3 (1 year post baseline)16.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.55
NeedChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleT2 (6 months post baseline)19.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleBaseline21.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.37
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleT3 (1 year post baseline)18.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.41
PreferenceChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleT2 (6 months post baseline)17.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.97
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleT2 (6 months post baseline)16.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.34
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleT3 (1 year post baseline)17.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.54
Attention ControlChange in Caregiver's Perceived Stress ScaleBaseline19.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48
Primary

Change in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

Change in self-assessment of general physical health, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10 Global Health). Ten items are rated on a five-point scale, scores range from 0-20, and a higher score indicates better health and health-related quality of life.

Time frame: From T1 (baseline) to T2 (6 months) through T3 (one year)

Population: The overall analyzed participants included all who completed the T3 questionnaire across the three arms. 15 participants in each arm discontinued their participation between baseline (T1) and T3. Thus, this number equals 308 (who completed baseline measures) minus 45 (who dropped out over time) which equals 263 at T3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeedChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T2 (6 months post baseline)14.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.94
NeedChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)Baseline14.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
NeedChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T3 (1 year post baseline)14.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
PreferenceChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T2 (6 months post baseline)14.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
PreferenceChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)Baseline14.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
PreferenceChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T3 (1 year post baseline)14.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Attention ControlChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)Baseline14.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Attention ControlChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T3 (1 year post baseline)14.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Attention ControlChange in Global Health - Physical Health: PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)T2 (6 months post baseline)14.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026