Skip to content

Cannabidiol and CES1 Interactions in Healthy Subjects

An Assessment of the Drug Interaction Potential Between Oral Cannabidiol (Epidiolex®) and the CES1 Substrate Methylphenidate in Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04603391
Enrollment
14
Registered
2020-10-26
Start date
2021-02-25
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2024-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Drug Interaction

Brief summary

The proposed study will assess the drug interaction potential between oral cannabidiol (Epidiolex®) and the carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) substrate methylphenidate (Ritalin®) in 12 healthy research subjects

Detailed description

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a widely utilized nonpsychoactive cannabinoid available as an OTC supplement, a component of medical cannabis, and a prescriptive treatment of childhood epilepsies. In vitro studies suggest CBD may inhibit a number of drug-metabolizing enzymes, including carboxylesterase 1 (CES1). The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of CBD on the disposition of the CES1 substrate methylphenidate (MPH). This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study involving 12 healthy subjects. Each subject ingested 750 mg of CBD solution, or alternatively, a placebo solution twice daily for a 3-day run-in period followed by an additional CBD dose (or placebo) and a single 10 mg dose of MPH and completed serial blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis. MPH and CBD concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

Interventions

DRUGdl-Methylphenidate plus Cannabidiol

Subjects will be administered one 10 mg tablet of dl-methylphenidate (Ritalin®) plus 7.5 mL Epidiolex® solution

DRUGdl-Methylphenidate plus Cannabidiol Placebo solution

Subjects will be administered one 10 mg tablet of dl-methylphenidate (Ritalin®) plus 7.5 mL of Epidiolex® placebo solution

Sponsors

Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

An open-label, randomized crossover design is proposed wherein healthy volunteer subjects (n=12) would receive a single dose of immediate-release dl-methylphenidate (Ritalin®) concomitantly with orally administered CBD (Epidiolex®) solution or an equal volume of Epidiolex® placebo solution (i.e vehicle with no CBD) which have been dosed to plasma steady-state conditions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Signed Informed Consent * Age: 21-45 years * Gender: males and females (50:50) * Race or ethnicity: no restrictions * Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 to 28 kg/m2 (inclusive) * Satisfactory completion of the screening medical history, physical exam, and laboratory evaluations. * Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment and avoid pregnancy during study participation. * With the exception of oral contraceptives, subjects must not be taking prescription or OTC medication for the duration of study participation * Subjects must have no ongoing use of any botanical/nutritional supplement, vitamin, or energy drink for the duration of study participation

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of a known allergy, hypersensitivity, or adverse reaction to CBD or cannabis, or sesame seed oil * The presence of a known allergy, hypersensitivity, or adverse reaction to methylphenidate or dexmethylphenidate (Focalin®) * A history (within the past year) or presence of clinically significant cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, immunological, hematological, endocrine, or neurologic disease will render subjects ineligible for the study. * The presence of any surgical or medical condition (active or chronic) that may interfere with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion including; 1. Gastric bezoar 2. Swallowing disorders 3. Strictures 4. Fistulas 5. GI obstruction 6. Severe dsyphasgia 7. Crohn's disease 8. Diverticulitis 9. A positive urine pregnancy test. 10. A positive Urine Drug Screen 11. Any concomitant prescription medication, OTC medication, herbal or other dietary supplement or vitamins during the study period. All subjects must be medication-free from 7 Days before initiation of the first active study day, through the duration of the study. This exclusion the use of vitamins, herbal preparations and OTC supplements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences in the Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of the Peak Concentration (Cmax) Will be Compared Between the Two Exposure Conditions; i.e. Methylphenidate + CBD vs Methylphenidate + Placebo.8 hoursPlasma methylphenidate (MPH) concentrations for both arms were determined by using a liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. Peak concentration (Cmax) was reported as observed for each subject. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) of the Cmax for MPH were compared between the two exposure conditions, i.e., MPH with CBD versus MPH with placebo. In brief, if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of GMR for Cmax between the CBD group and placebo group extend beyond the FDA's established bioequivalent limits of 0.8-1.25, the result was interpreted to represent a DDI. In our case, a GMR greater than 1.25 would be indicative of a DDI, since CBD would impair CES1's ability to efficiently metabolize MPH, thus a higher ratio of Cmax's of MPH in our CBD group relative to our placebo group.
Differences in the Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of the Area Under the Time Curve 0-infinity (AUCinf) for Methylphenidate Will be Compared Between the Two Exposure Conditions; i.e. Methylphenidate + CBD vs Methylphenidate + Placebo.0-8 hours (determined), 8 hours-infinity (extrapolated)All methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was estimated by linear least-squares regression of the terminal portion of the plasma concentration (on natural logarithmic scale)-time curve. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of methylphenidate AUC 0-8h were calculated according to the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC8-inf was extrapolated by using the last observed concentration of MPH (Clast) and dividing it by λz. AUC0-8 was added to AUC8-inf to get AUCinf. The GMR of the AUCinf for MPH were compared between the two exposure conditions, i.e., MPH with CBD versus MPH with placebo. In brief, if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of GMR for Cmax between the CBD group and placebo group was beyond the FDA's established bioequivalent limits of 0.8-1.25, the result was interpreted to represent a DDI. A GMR greater than 1.25 would be indicative of a DDI.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Time Curve 0-8hours (AUC0-8h) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions; Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.8 hoursAll methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of methylphenidate AUC 0-8h was calculated according to the linear trapezoidal rule.
Peak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.8 hoursPlasma methylphenidate (MPH) concentrations for both arms were determined by using a liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. Peak concentration (Cmax) was reported as observed for each subject (highest observed plasma concentration of methylphenidate).
Half Life Determination (t1/2) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.8 hoursAll methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was estimated by linear least-squares regression of the terminal portion of the plasma concentration (on natural logarithmic scale)-time curve. The elimination half-live (t1/2) was then calculated using the formula t1/2 = 0.693/λz.
Area Under the Time Curve 0-infinity (AUCinf) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.0-8 hours (determined), 8 hours-infinity (extrapolated)All methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was estimated by linear least-squares regression of the terminal portion of the plasma concentration (on natural logarithmic scale)-time curve. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of methylphenidate AUC 0-8h were calculated according to the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC8-inf was extrapolated by using the last observed concentration of MPH (Clast) and dividing it by λz. AUC0-8 was added to AUC8-inf to get AUCinf.
Time to Peak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.8 hoursPlasma methylphenidate (MPH) concentrations for both arms were determined by using a liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The time to peak plasma methylphenidate concentrations (Tmax) was reported as observed for each subject.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After enrollment, subjects were assigned a screening visit date at the Clinical Research Center to obtain a medical history, physical, and routine lab tests including a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, urinalysis, and urine drug screen.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Subjects for Both Sequences
Sequence 1: Subjects received a three day run in of 7.5 mL of Epidiolex® solution \[100 mg/ml\]). On day four, all subjects returned to the clinical research center to receive one oral dose of 7.5 mL of Epidiolex® solution \[100 mg/ml\]) and one 10 mg tablet of dl-methylphenidate (Ritalin®) orally in a fed state (a 30 minute standardized breakfast). After a minimum washout period of five days, subjects received a three day run in of 7.5 ml of Epidiolex® placebo solution orally twice daily. On day four, all subjects returned to the clinical research center to receive one oral dose of 7.5 mL of Epidiolex® placebo solution and one 10 mg tablet of dl-methylphenidate (Ritalin®) orally in a fed state (a 30 minute standardized breakfast). Sequence 2: Subjects received a three day run in of 7.5 ml of Epidiolex® placebo solution orally twice daily. On day four, all subjects returned to the clinical research center to receive one oral dose of 7.5 mL of Epidiolex® placebo solution and one 10 mg tablet of dl-methylphenidate (Ritalin®) orally in a fed state (a 30 minute standardized breakfast). After a minimum washout period of five days, Subjects received a three day run in of 7.5 mL of Epidiolex® solution \[100 mg/ml\]). On day four, all subjects returned to the clinical research center to receive one oral dose of Epidiolex® solution \[100 mg/ml\]) and one 10 mg tablet of dl-methylphenidate (Ritalin®) orally in a fed state (a 30 minute standardized breakfast).
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Intervention (4 Days)Adverse Event10
First Intervention (4 Days)Lost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Subjects for Both Sequences
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants
Age, Continuous26.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.54
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 140 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Differences in the Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of the Area Under the Time Curve 0-infinity (AUCinf) for Methylphenidate Will be Compared Between the Two Exposure Conditions; i.e. Methylphenidate + CBD vs Methylphenidate + Placebo.

All methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was estimated by linear least-squares regression of the terminal portion of the plasma concentration (on natural logarithmic scale)-time curve. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of methylphenidate AUC 0-8h were calculated according to the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC8-inf was extrapolated by using the last observed concentration of MPH (Clast) and dividing it by λz. AUC0-8 was added to AUC8-inf to get AUCinf. The GMR of the AUCinf for MPH were compared between the two exposure conditions, i.e., MPH with CBD versus MPH with placebo. In brief, if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of GMR for Cmax between the CBD group and placebo group was beyond the FDA's established bioequivalent limits of 0.8-1.25, the result was interpreted to represent a DDI. A GMR greater than 1.25 would be indicative of a DDI.

Time frame: 0-8 hours (determined), 8 hours-infinity (extrapolated)

Population: Each subject served as their own control, so since all 12 subjects that completed the study went through both arms, we were able to analyze the both arms for each subject. Hence, 12 subjects gave us 24 arms (2 arms/subject). The AUCinf for each subject in the methylphenidate and CBD arm was directly compared to their methylphenidate and placebo arm, allowing us to determine the ratio of change in the presence of CBD.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
All ParticipantsDifferences in the Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of the Area Under the Time Curve 0-infinity (AUCinf) for Methylphenidate Will be Compared Between the Two Exposure Conditions; i.e. Methylphenidate + CBD vs Methylphenidate + Placebo.1.09 Ratio
Primary

Differences in the Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of the Peak Concentration (Cmax) Will be Compared Between the Two Exposure Conditions; i.e. Methylphenidate + CBD vs Methylphenidate + Placebo.

Plasma methylphenidate (MPH) concentrations for both arms were determined by using a liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. Peak concentration (Cmax) was reported as observed for each subject. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) of the Cmax for MPH were compared between the two exposure conditions, i.e., MPH with CBD versus MPH with placebo. In brief, if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of GMR for Cmax between the CBD group and placebo group extend beyond the FDA's established bioequivalent limits of 0.8-1.25, the result was interpreted to represent a DDI. In our case, a GMR greater than 1.25 would be indicative of a DDI, since CBD would impair CES1's ability to efficiently metabolize MPH, thus a higher ratio of Cmax's of MPH in our CBD group relative to our placebo group.

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: Each subject served as their own control, so since all 12 subjects that completed the study went through both arms, we were able to analyze the both arms for each subject. Hence, 12 subjects gave us 24 arms (2 arms/subject). The Cmax for each subject in the methylphenidate and CBD arm was directly compared to their methylphenidate and placebo arm, allowing us to determine the ratio of change in the presence of CBD.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
All ParticipantsDifferences in the Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of the Peak Concentration (Cmax) Will be Compared Between the Two Exposure Conditions; i.e. Methylphenidate + CBD vs Methylphenidate + Placebo.1.08 Ratio
Other Pre-specified

Area Under the Time Curve 0-8hours (AUC0-8h) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions; Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.

All methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of methylphenidate AUC 0-8h was calculated according to the linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: Each subject served as their own control, so since all 12 subjects that completed the study went through both arms, we were able to analyze the both arms for each subject. Hence, 12 subjects gave us 24 arms (2 arms/subject).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsArea Under the Time Curve 0-8hours (AUC0-8h) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions; Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.55.7 ng/mL*h
Methylphenidate and Placebo Arm OnlyArea Under the Time Curve 0-8hours (AUC0-8h) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions; Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.49.6 ng/mL*h
Other Pre-specified

Area Under the Time Curve 0-infinity (AUCinf) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.

All methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was estimated by linear least-squares regression of the terminal portion of the plasma concentration (on natural logarithmic scale)-time curve. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of methylphenidate AUC 0-8h were calculated according to the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC8-inf was extrapolated by using the last observed concentration of MPH (Clast) and dividing it by λz. AUC0-8 was added to AUC8-inf to get AUCinf.

Time frame: 0-8 hours (determined), 8 hours-infinity (extrapolated)

Population: Each subject served as their own control, so since all 12 subjects that completed the study went through both arms, we were able to analyze the both arms for each subject. Hence, 12 subjects gave us 24 arms (2 arms/subject).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsArea Under the Time Curve 0-infinity (AUCinf) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.70.7 ng/mL*h
Methylphenidate and Placebo Arm OnlyArea Under the Time Curve 0-infinity (AUCinf) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.63.6 ng/mL*h
Other Pre-specified

Half Life Determination (t1/2) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.

All methylphenidate plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was estimated by linear least-squares regression of the terminal portion of the plasma concentration (on natural logarithmic scale)-time curve. The elimination half-live (t1/2) was then calculated using the formula t1/2 = 0.693/λz.

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: Each subject served as their own control, so since all 12 subjects that completed the study went through both arms, we were able to analyze the both arms for each subject. Hence, 12 subjects gave us 24 arms (2 arms/subject).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsHalf Life Determination (t1/2) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.3.17 hours (h)
Methylphenidate and Placebo Arm OnlyHalf Life Determination (t1/2) for Methylphenidate for the Two Exposure Conditions for Methylphenidate and CBD and Methylphenidate and Placebo.3.12 hours (h)
Other Pre-specified

Peak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.

Plasma methylphenidate (MPH) concentrations for both arms were determined by using a liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. Peak concentration (Cmax) was reported as observed for each subject (highest observed plasma concentration of methylphenidate).

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: Each subject served as their own control, so since all 12 subjects that completed the study went through both arms, we were able to analyze the both arms for each subject. Hence, 12 subjects gave us 24 arms (2 arms/subject). The Cmax for each subject in the methylphenidate and CBD arm and the methylphenidate and placebo arm was directly reported/analyzed below.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsPeak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.13.5 ng/mL
Methylphenidate and Placebo Arm OnlyPeak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.12.2 ng/mL
Other Pre-specified

Time to Peak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.

Plasma methylphenidate (MPH) concentrations for both arms were determined by using a liquid-liquid extraction method and LC-MS/MS analysis. The time to peak plasma methylphenidate concentrations (Tmax) was reported as observed for each subject.

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: Each subject served as their own control, so since all 12 subjects that completed the study went through both arms, we were able to analyze the both arms for each subject. Hence, 12 subjects gave us 24 arms (2 arms/subject). The Tmax for each subject in the methylphenidate and CBD arm and the methylphenidate and placebo arm was directly reported/analyzed below.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsTime to Peak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.1.25 hours (h)
Methylphenidate and Placebo Arm OnlyTime to Peak Methylphenidate Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Methylphenidate and CBD Arms and Methylphenidate and Placebo Arms.1.75 hours (h)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026