Skip to content

Building Adaptive Coping and Knowledge to Improve Daily Life

Building Adaptive Coping and Knowledge to Improve Daily Life (Back2Life): A Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial for Youth With Chronic Sickle Cell Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04602728
Acronym
Back2Life
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-10-26
Start date
2021-01-27
Completion date
2024-05-18
Last updated
2025-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

Pediatrics, Cognitive behavioral therapy, Behavioral intervention

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out how teenagers with chronic pain and sickle cell disease respond to a new training program called Back2Life and get their feedback about how to modify the program to best fit their needs. The Back2Life training program focuses on teaching pain coping skills (also known as cognitive-behavioral therapy). The program teaches skills and strategies that may help teens improve chronic pain management and get back into their everyday activities.

Detailed description

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder of the hemoglobin in which the course of acute pain from vaso-occlusion and its sequelae vary widely across genotypes and individual patients. SCD pain often begins during childhood and can progress to chronic pain for approximately 23% of children and adolescents. Youth with chronic SCD pain, that is pain that is present on most days per month and persists for at least 6 months, report high levels of functional disability, elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms, and reduced quality of life relative to youth with SCD without chronic pain. The complex, multifactorial nature of chronic SCD pain can also contribute to increased healthcare utilization for pain. The most effective management and treatment of chronic SCD pain likely requires individualized, multimodal, multidisciplinary treatments that go beyond pharmacological management alone. A range of evidence-based non-pharmacological treatments, such as behavioral health, complementary, and integrative health approaches, are recommended for chronic pain management and are gaining greater awareness and integration into comprehensive chronic pain care. Behavioral health treatment, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pain, focuses on improved daily functioning and coping through several core treatment components such as psychoeducation about how the body processes pain, relaxation skills training, and cognitive strategies. Youth with chronic SCD pain need an evidence-based, culturally informed, adaptive treatment. Behavioral treatments that are tailored to patient and family needs are beneficial when patients may require different levels of care. Adaptive designs are more effective in improving health outcomes, satisfaction with treatment, and reducing healthcare use than standard protocols where patients receive a fixed one size fits all treatment that is not personalized to their needs; adaptive designs are also recommended for tailoring evidence-based interventions with culturally diverse populations. Adaptive treatments can integrate evidence-based strategies to address common co-morbid problems associated with chronic pain, such as elevated anxiety or depressive symptoms or sleep disturbance. Teaching parents problem-solving skills can reduce caregiver stress among families managing chronic pain and illness. This study utilizes an adaptive behavioral treatment to target psychosocial risk factors for youth with chronic SCD pain as a first step towards developing a stepped care model for SCD pain. The proposed treatment, called Back2Life, is innovative because it is culturally informed by families' and patients' feedback regarding their treatment preferences and targets psychological co-morbidities that are often excluded in clinical trials. The overarching hypothesis driving the proposed intervention is that disrupting the complex interacting psychosocial factors that can exacerbate chronic SCD pain will prevent and/or reduce poor health outcomes in children and adolescents with SCD. Reductions in inflammatory biomarkers are examined as an exploratory hypothesis and participants can consent to an optional blood draw for this portion of the study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBack2Life

The Back2Life intervention uses an adaptive treatment approach with module-based treatment sessions selected on the basis of baseline assessment (rather than a fixed treatment approach) to allow flexibility in tailoring treatment components to meet individual family needs. All youth participants will receive the standard 6-session pain coping skills training program, consisting of learning ways to cope with and manage chronic sickle cell pain. The standard program includes topics that were identified by young people with chronic sickle cell pain and their parents as important skills for all youth with chronic pain and sickle cell disease. In addition to the standard 6-session program, youth participants may receive an additional 1 to 4 sessions that may help with specific problems and/or co-morbidities related to pain. At least one parent or guardian is required to attend the sessions with their child.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Youth and parent/caregiver dyads will participate in the same intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for Youth: * diagnosed with SCD (any genotype) * report chronic pain * speak and read English * have not initiated new disease modifying-treatments (e.g, hydroxyurea, Endari, voxelotor, crizanlizumab, chronic transfusions) or significantly increased dosages of any disease-modifying treatments in the past 3 months Inclusion Criteria for Parents or Caregivers: * speak and read English

Exclusion criteria

for Youth: * have comorbid medical conditions typically associated with pain but unrelated to SCD (e.g., rheumatologic disorders or inflammatory bowel disease) * are receiving chronic transfusion indicated for central nervous system risks and/or complications, previous overt strokes, or significant cognitive or developmental limitations, as per their healthcare provider or parent, that would impair completion of self-report measures or engagement in treatment sessions * received ≥ 3 sessions of outpatient psychological therapy for pain management in the 6 months prior to screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Dyads Completing the StudyMonth 6Treatment feasibility was assessed by the number of participant dyads who complete the study.
Number of Dyads Completing Study Assignments Within Six MonthsMonth 6Treatment feasibility was assessed by the number of dyads completing the 6-Month study assignment.
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The PROMIS Pediatric Short Form for Pain Interference, Self- and Parent-Proxy Report, is an 8-item self-report measure assessing functional interference due to pain in the past 7 days. Total scores are standardized to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate increased hindrance of life activities due to pain.
Sickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth (SCPBI-Y) ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The Sickle Cell Pain Burden Interview for Youth, Self-Report is a 7-item, validated measure of pain burden in 7-21 year olds. Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = none and 4 = every. The patient self-reports the amount of days in the past month where pain occurred or pain impacted daily life. Total scores range from 0 to 28 and higher scores indicate a greater pain burden.
PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report is an 8-item measure completed by parents that assesses pain behaviors displayed by their child in the past 7 days. Total scores are standardized to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate increased behaviors due to pain.
Child Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6Child Self-Efficacy Scale, Self- and Parent-Proxy Report is a well-established, 7-item measure of self-efficacy for functioning despite pain for 8-19 year olds. Respondents report how sure about their (or their child's) ability to perform certain daily tasks when they have pain, on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = very sure and 5 = very unsure. Total scores range from 7 to 35 and lower scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Number of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention InterviewImmediately Post-TreatmentTreatment feasibility was assessed via a qualitative interview where participants were asked open ended questions. Participants were asked if they thought the Back2Life program helpful, if delivering the program through telemedicine was reasonable, and if the program was a reasonable approach for chronic pain management of sickle cell disease.
Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) ScoreImmediately Post-TreatmentThe Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form was completed at the end of treatment. It includes 9 items adapted to be specific to pediatric pain. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate increased acceptability with the study treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interleukin -1β (IL-1β) ConcentrationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IL-1β is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IL-1β increases in response to inflammation, pain, and autoimmune diseases.
IInterleukin 6 (IL-6) ConcentrationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IL-6 is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IL-6 is increased during injury or illness.
Interleukin 8 (IL-8) ConcentrationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IL-8 is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IL-8 is produced during the presence of inflammation.
Hospital Admissions Per Participant12 months prior to Baseline, 12 months post-treatmentHealthcare utilization was extracted from the medical record to document the mean number of hospital admissions for pain per participant during the 12 months preceding the intervention and the 12-month period post-treatment.
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ConcentrationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker CRP is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. CRP increases in response to bodily inflammation.
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) ConcentrationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker BDNF is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. BDNF expression is reduced when high bodily inflammation is present.
Interferon Gamma (IFN-y) ConcentrationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IFN-y is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IFN-y is involved with regulating immune and inflammatory responses. IFN-y concentration is elevated during illness.
Tumor Necrosis Factor - Alpha (TNF-α) ConcentrationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker TNF-α is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that regulates the inflammatory response and it is elevated during illness or injury.
Days Per Week of Opioid UseBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6Daily use of opioid pain medication was determined based on participant completion of daily diaries for 1-week at each assessment visit. Participants recorded opioid use daily (presence/absence).
Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The Pediatric Inventory for Parents is a 42-item parent-reported measure of caregiver stress related to child chronic illness. Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 5 = extremely. Total scores range from 42 to 210 and higher scores indicate greater caregiver stress.
Emergency Department Visits Per Participant12 months prior to Baseline, 12 months post-treatmentHealthcare utilization was extracted from the medical record to document the mean number of emergency department (ED) visits for pain per participant during the 12 months preceding the intervention period and the 12-month period post-treatment.
Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) is a 28-item patient-reported describing the occurrence and frequency of various behavioral sleep characteristics over the past month. Responses are given on a 6-point Likert scale where 1 = always and 6 = never. Total scores are calculated as the mean score from each time and range from 1 to 6 where higher scores indicate better sleep quality.
PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms questionnaire, Self- and Parent-Proxy Report is an 8-item measure designed for youth to assess self-reported symptoms of depression. Total scores are standardized to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate increased depression.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Child and Parent Report, is a 13-item well-validated self-report and parent-report measure of worried thoughts about pain. Items are answered on a 5-point scale where 0 = not true at all and 4 = very true. Total scores range from 0 to 52 and higher scores indicate increased catastrophic thinking.
Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreBaseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6The Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire, Adolescent and Parent Report is a 30-item measure designed to evaluate parent and adolescent perceptions of readiness to adopt a self-management approach to pain. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Average scores are obtained for categories of Pre-contemplation (believing pain management is solely the responsibility of medical professionals), Contemplation (considering using self-management for pain), Action (starts taking ownership of pain control and self-management of pain), and Maintenance (continuous development and self-management of chronic pain); the category with the highest score indicates where the youth participant is in terms of stages of change related to pain management. For this outcome measure, the average scores for the Action scale are reported. Total scores for the Action scale range from 1 to 5 and higher scores indicate increased readiness to self-manage pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory Children's Center, and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Hughes Spalding in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Participant enrollment began January 27, 2021. Data collection for the 6 Month time point ended August 23, 2023 and data collection for the 12 Month time point was complete on May 18, 2024.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Back2Life Program for Youth
Youth with chronic SCD pain receiving an adaptive cognitive behavioral treatment program for pain coping skills.
20
Back2Life for Parents or Caregivers
Parents or caregivers of youth with chronic SCD pain receiving an adaptive cognitive behavioral treatment program for pain coping skills.
20
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBack2Life Program for YouthTotalBack2Life for Parents or Caregivers
Age, Continuous15.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
26.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants33 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants35 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants40 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants28 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants12 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Child Self-Efficacy Scale Score

Child Self-Efficacy Scale, Self- and Parent-Proxy Report is a well-established, 7-item measure of self-efficacy for functioning despite pain for 8-19 year olds. Respondents report how sure about their (or their child's) ability to perform certain daily tasks when they have pain, on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = very sure and 5 = very unsure. Total scores range from 7 to 35 and lower scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreBaseline23.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Back2Life Program for YouthChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment20.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Back2Life Program for YouthChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreMonth 318.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Back2Life Program for YouthChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreMonth 617.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreMonth 621.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreBaseline24.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreMonth 324.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversChild Self-Efficacy Scale ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment24.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Primary

Number of Dyads Completing Study Assignments Within Six Months

Treatment feasibility was assessed by the number of dyads completing the 6-Month study assignment.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes youth and caregivers dyad participants who completed the Back2Life program.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Back2Life Program for YouthNumber of Dyads Completing Study Assignments Within Six Months16 dyads
Primary

Number of Dyads Completing the Study

Treatment feasibility was assessed by the number of participant dyads who complete the study.

Time frame: Month 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Back2Life Program for YouthNumber of Dyads Completing the Study16 dyads
Primary

Number of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention Interview

Treatment feasibility was assessed via a qualitative interview where participants were asked open ended questions. Participants were asked if they thought the Back2Life program helpful, if delivering the program through telemedicine was reasonable, and if the program was a reasonable approach for chronic pain management of sickle cell disease.

Time frame: Immediately Post-Treatment

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the Back2Life program.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Back2Life Program for YouthNumber of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention InterviewReported program was helpful15 Participants
Back2Life Program for YouthNumber of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention InterviewReported a positive experience with telehealth delivery16 Participants
Back2Life Program for YouthNumber of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention InterviewReported the program was relevant to sickle cell disease16 Participants
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversNumber of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention InterviewReported program was helpful16 Participants
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversNumber of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention InterviewReported a positive experience with telehealth delivery16 Participants
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversNumber of Participants With Positive Experiences During Participant Evaluation of the Intervention InterviewReported the program was relevant to sickle cell disease16 Participants
Primary

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference Score

The PROMIS Pediatric Short Form for Pain Interference, Self- and Parent-Proxy Report, is an 8-item self-report measure assessing functional interference due to pain in the past 7 days. Total scores are standardized to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate increased hindrance of life activities due to pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreBaseline61.5 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.8
Back2Life Program for YouthPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment58.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.5
Back2Life Program for YouthPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreMonth 350.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.6
Back2Life Program for YouthPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreMonth 650.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 14.1
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreMonth 657.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.9
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreBaseline62.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.1
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreMonth 353.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.9
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Pain Interference ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment59.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.2
Primary

PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report Score

The PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report is an 8-item measure completed by parents that assesses pain behaviors displayed by their child in the past 7 days. Total scores are standardized to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate increased behaviors due to pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes parent or caregiver participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report ScoreBaseline52.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 20.6
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment52.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 20.6
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report ScoreMonth 346.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 22
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Pain Behaviors, Parent-Proxy Report ScoreMonth 650.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 25.9
Primary

Sickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth (SCPBI-Y) Score

The Sickle Cell Pain Burden Interview for Youth, Self-Report is a 7-item, validated measure of pain burden in 7-21 year olds. Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = none and 4 = every. The patient self-reports the amount of days in the past month where pain occurred or pain impacted daily life. Total scores range from 0 to 28 and higher scores indicate a greater pain burden.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes youth participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthSickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth (SCPBI-Y) ScoreBaseline13.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Back2Life Program for YouthSickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth (SCPBI-Y) ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Back2Life Program for YouthSickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth (SCPBI-Y) ScoreMonth 39.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Back2Life Program for YouthSickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth (SCPBI-Y) ScoreMonth 67.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Primary

Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) Score

The Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form was completed at the end of treatment. It includes 9 items adapted to be specific to pediatric pain. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate increased acceptability with the study treatment.

Time frame: Immediately Post-Treatment

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the Back2Life program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthTreatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) Score32.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversTreatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF) Score31.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) Score

The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) is a 28-item patient-reported describing the occurrence and frequency of various behavioral sleep characteristics over the past month. Responses are given on a 6-point Likert scale where 1 = always and 6 = never. Total scores are calculated as the mean score from each time and range from 1 to 6 where higher scores indicate better sleep quality.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthAdolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) ScoreBaseline2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Back2Life Program for YouthAdolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Back2Life Program for YouthAdolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) ScoreMonth 32.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Back2Life Program for YouthAdolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) ScoreMonth 63.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Concentration

Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker BDNF is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. BDNF expression is reduced when high bodily inflammation is present.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes youth participants who provided an analyzable blood sample for the indicated time point. Collection of biomarkers was an optional study activity for participants, requiring separate consent. A total of 4 participants contributed at least one sample during the course of the study. Not all collected samples could be analyzed due to laboratory issues, such as insufficient sample volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) ConcentrationBaseline4052.33 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1445.3
Back2Life Program for YouthBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) ConcentrationMonth 33823.00 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Back2Life Program for YouthBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) ConcentrationMonth 64867.50 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1853.33
Secondary

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration

Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker CRP is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. CRP increases in response to bodily inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes youth participants who provided an analyzable blood sample for the indicated time point. Collection of biomarkers was an optional study activity for participants, requiring separate consent. A total of 4 participants contributed at least one sample during the course of the study. Not all collected samples could be analyzed due to laboratory issues, such as insufficient sample volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthC-Reactive Protein (CRP) ConcentrationBaseline1710.74 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 746.33
Back2Life Program for YouthC-Reactive Protein (CRP) ConcentrationMonth 34795.63 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 0
Back2Life Program for YouthC-Reactive Protein (CRP) ConcentrationMonth 65206.06 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 3271.69
Secondary

Days Per Week of Opioid Use

Daily use of opioid pain medication was determined based on participant completion of daily diaries for 1-week at each assessment visit. Participants recorded opioid use daily (presence/absence).

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes youth participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthDays Per Week of Opioid UseBaseline3.9 days/weekStandard Deviation 2.1
Back2Life Program for YouthDays Per Week of Opioid UseImmediately Post-Treatment1.5 days/weekStandard Deviation 1.4
Back2Life Program for YouthDays Per Week of Opioid UseMonth 31.8 days/weekStandard Deviation 0.75
Back2Life Program for YouthDays Per Week of Opioid UseMonth 61.2 days/weekStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Emergency Department Visits Per Participant

Healthcare utilization was extracted from the medical record to document the mean number of emergency department (ED) visits for pain per participant during the 12 months preceding the intervention period and the 12-month period post-treatment.

Time frame: 12 months prior to Baseline, 12 months post-treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthEmergency Department Visits Per Participant12 Months Pre-Treatment0.86 visits per participantStandard Deviation 1.06
Back2Life Program for YouthEmergency Department Visits Per Participant12 Months Post-Treatment0.9 visits per participantStandard Deviation 1.07
Secondary

Hospital Admissions Per Participant

Healthcare utilization was extracted from the medical record to document the mean number of hospital admissions for pain per participant during the 12 months preceding the intervention and the 12-month period post-treatment.

Time frame: 12 months prior to Baseline, 12 months post-treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthHospital Admissions Per Participant12 Months Pre-Treatment1.19 admissions per participantStandard Deviation 1.29
Back2Life Program for YouthHospital Admissions Per Participant12 Months Post-Treatment1.25 admissions per participantStandard Deviation 1.29
Secondary

IInterleukin 6 (IL-6) Concentration

Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IL-6 is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IL-6 is increased during injury or illness.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes youth participants who provided an analyzable blood sample for the indicated time point. Collection of biomarkers was an optional study activity for participants, requiring separate consent. A total of 4 participants contributed at least one sample during the course of the study. Not all collected samples could be analyzed due to laboratory issues, such as insufficient sample volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthIInterleukin 6 (IL-6) ConcentrationMonth 61.91 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.8
Back2Life Program for YouthIInterleukin 6 (IL-6) ConcentrationBaseline1.88 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.31
Back2Life Program for YouthIInterleukin 6 (IL-6) ConcentrationMonth 32.24 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Interferon Gamma (IFN-y) Concentration

Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IFN-y is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IFN-y is involved with regulating immune and inflammatory responses. IFN-y concentration is elevated during illness.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes youth participants who provided an analyzable blood sample for the indicated time point. Collection of biomarkers was an optional study activity for participants, requiring separate consent. A total of 4 participants contributed at least one sample during the course of the study. Not all collected samples could be analyzed due to laboratory issues, such as insufficient sample volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthInterferon Gamma (IFN-y) ConcentrationBaseline19.26 pg/mLStandard Deviation 17.99
Back2Life Program for YouthInterferon Gamma (IFN-y) ConcentrationMonth 320 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Back2Life Program for YouthInterferon Gamma (IFN-y) ConcentrationMonth 619.70 pg/mLStandard Deviation 10.04
Secondary

Interleukin -1β (IL-1β) Concentration

Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IL-1β is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IL-1β increases in response to inflammation, pain, and autoimmune diseases.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes youth participants who provided an analyzable blood sample for the indicated time point. Collection of biomarkers was an optional study activity for participants, requiring separate consent. A total of 4 participants contributed at least one sample during the course of the study. Not all collected samples could be analyzed due to laboratory issues, such as insufficient sample volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthInterleukin -1β (IL-1β) ConcentrationBaseline1.25 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 1.21
Back2Life Program for YouthInterleukin -1β (IL-1β) ConcentrationMonth 31.15 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0
Back2Life Program for YouthInterleukin -1β (IL-1β) ConcentrationMonth 60.95 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.88
Secondary

Interleukin 8 (IL-8) Concentration

Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker IL-8 is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. IL-8 is produced during the presence of inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes youth participants who provided an analyzable blood sample for the indicated time point. Collection of biomarkers was an optional study activity for participants, requiring separate consent. A total of 4 participants contributed at least one sample during the course of the study. Not all collected samples could be analyzed due to laboratory issues, such as insufficient sample volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthInterleukin 8 (IL-8) ConcentrationBaseline10.28 pg/mLStandard Deviation 8.26
Back2Life Program for YouthInterleukin 8 (IL-8) ConcentrationMonth 327.70 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Back2Life Program for YouthInterleukin 8 (IL-8) ConcentrationMonth 614.28 pg/mLStandard Deviation 14.32
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Scale Score

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Child and Parent Report, is a 13-item well-validated self-report and parent-report measure of worried thoughts about pain. Items are answered on a 5-point scale where 0 = not true at all and 4 = very true. Total scores range from 0 to 52 and higher scores indicate increased catastrophic thinking.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreBaseline27.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment24.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreMonth 318.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreMonth 615.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreMonth 634.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreBaseline33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreMonth 325.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment35.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Secondary

Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale Score

The Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire, Adolescent and Parent Report is a 30-item measure designed to evaluate parent and adolescent perceptions of readiness to adopt a self-management approach to pain. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Average scores are obtained for categories of Pre-contemplation (believing pain management is solely the responsibility of medical professionals), Contemplation (considering using self-management for pain), Action (starts taking ownership of pain control and self-management of pain), and Maintenance (continuous development and self-management of chronic pain); the category with the highest score indicates where the youth participant is in terms of stages of change related to pain management. For this outcome measure, the average scores for the Action scale are reported. Total scores for the Action scale range from 1 to 5 and higher scores indicate increased readiness to self-manage pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreBaseline3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreMonth 34.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Back2Life Program for YouthPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreMonth 64.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreMonth 63.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreBaseline3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreMonth 33.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Action Scale ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Secondary

Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) Score

The Pediatric Inventory for Parents is a 42-item parent-reported measure of caregiver stress related to child chronic illness. Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 5 = extremely. Total scores range from 42 to 210 and higher scores indicate greater caregiver stress.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthPediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) ScoreBaseline104.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.3
Back2Life Program for YouthPediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment91.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.7
Back2Life Program for YouthPediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) ScoreMonth 372.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.8
Back2Life Program for YouthPediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) ScoreMonth 671.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
Secondary

PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms Score

The PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms questionnaire, Self- and Parent-Proxy Report is an 8-item measure designed for youth to assess self-reported symptoms of depression. Total scores are standardized to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate increased depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post-Treatment, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The analysis population includes participants remaining in the study at the indicated time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreBaseline71.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.3
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment68.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreMonth 365.5 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.9
Back2Life Program for YouthPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreMonth 665.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.5
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreMonth 647.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.3
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreBaseline55.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.9
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreMonth 348.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12
Back2Life for Parents or CaregiversPROMIS Pediatric Short Form Depressive Symptoms ScoreImmediately Post-Treatment52.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 16.2
Secondary

Tumor Necrosis Factor - Alpha (TNF-α) Concentration

Plasma concentration of the inflammatory biomarker TNF-α is assessed among youth participants who opted for blood sample collection. TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that regulates the inflammatory response and it is elevated during illness or injury.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes youth participants who provided an analyzable blood sample for the indicated time point. Collection of biomarkers was an optional study activity for participants, requiring separate consent. A total of 4 participants contributed at least one sample during the course of the study. Not all collected samples could be analyzed due to laboratory issues, such as insufficient sample volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Back2Life Program for YouthTumor Necrosis Factor - Alpha (TNF-α) ConcentrationBaseline2.05 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.38
Back2Life Program for YouthTumor Necrosis Factor - Alpha (TNF-α) ConcentrationMonth 32.57 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Back2Life Program for YouthTumor Necrosis Factor - Alpha (TNF-α) ConcentrationMonth 62.04 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.93

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026