Skip to content

Diagnostic of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection by Lung Ultrasonography in General Practice

Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection by Lung Ultrasonography in General Practice : a Prospective, Interventional and Multicentric Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04602234
Acronym
AmbuLUS
Enrollment
151
Registered
2020-10-26
Start date
2019-12-30
Completion date
2020-03-18
Last updated
2020-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Resp Tract Infection, Ultrasound Therapy; Complications

Keywords

Lung ultrasonography, Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, General Practice

Brief summary

Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) is a frequent motive of consultation in General Practice. Cost, irradiation and availability of traditional imagery make it difficult to perform in every patient with suspected LRTI. The objective is to evaluate the performance of LUS realized by family physicians into the usual LRTI diagnostic pathway. This study is a prospective, interventional, multi-centric and open study conducted in 3 different centers by 15 General Practitioners (GP) in France. Patient complaining of dyspnea or cough were recruited from December 2019 to March 2020. GP received a training course by LUS expert before the study. The primary outcome measure was diagnosis modification after LUS. Secondary measures were therapeutic modification after LUS, decision of imagery prescription after LUS, decision of hospitalization or not after LUS, medical evolution and result of imagery initially prescribed by GP.

Detailed description

After an initial medical report, GP's concluded to an initial diagnosis and make initial prescription and finally decided or not to perform a standardized eight-points LUS. GP were free to perform or not LUS. If GP decided to perform LUS, GP were allowed to change their diagnosis and prescriptions (LUS group). However, therapeutic changes after LUS could not downgrade patient care.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLung ultrasonography

Investigators performed lung ultrasonography on patients

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Among the 151 patients included, 111 LUS were performed (LUS group)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 3 months * Dyspnea or cough complaint

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 3 months * Rejection to participate to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnosis modification3 monthsDiagnosis modification after lung ultrasonography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Therapeutic modification3 monthsTherapeutic modification after lung ultrasonography
Imagery prescription3 monthsDecision of imagery prescription after lung ultrasonography
Decision of hospitalization3 monthsDecision of an hospitalization or not after lung ultrasonography
Medical evolution3 monthsMedical evolution at 7 days (improvement, persistence, worsening and hospitalization)
Imagery result3 monthsResult of imagery initially prescribed by general practitioners (Chest CT-Scan or X-Ray)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026